Creating Apprenticeship Simulations for Teaching Enterprise Modelling – Principles and Lessons Learned

References

• Bergin, R. A., & Fors, U. (2003). Interactive simulated patient - An advanced tool for student activated learning in medicine and healthcare. Computers & Education, 40, 361–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bider, I., & Henkel, M. (2018, April). Using the structure of tacit knowing for acquiring an holistic view on IS field. IADIS International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 19–26). Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Bider, I., Henkel, M., Kowalski, S., & Perjons, E. (2015a). Simulating apprenticeship using multimedia in higher education: A case from the information systems field. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12, 137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bider, I., Henkel, M., Kowalski, S., & Perjons, E. (2015b, May). Teaching enterprise modeling based on multi-media simulation: A pragmatic approach. International Conference on E-Technologies, Montréal, Canada (pp. 239–254). Switzerland:Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, M., & Bider, I. (2019, April). Principles for design of simulated cases in teaching enterprise modelling. World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, Galicia, Spain (pp. 173–183). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, M., Bider, I., Perjons, E., Mårtensson, F., & Zainali, M. (2017, November). Reusing cases for teaching enterprise modelling - Feasibility study and reality check. Symposium on Conceptual Modeling Education (SCME’17), International conference on conceptual modelling (ER’17) (pp. 4–14). Valencia, Spain, CEUR.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, K. A., Trent, M. N., Jackson, J. R., Marquis, J. M., Barrett-Williams, S., Gurvitch, R., & Metzler, M. W. (2016). The effect of content delivery media on student engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Effective Teaching, 16, 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jesukiewicz, P. (2009). Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) (4th ed.). Orlando, USA: Content Aggregation Model, Advanced Distributed Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Johannesson, P., & Perjons, E. (2014). An introduction to design science. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, J., & Kendall, E. (2013). Systems analysis and design (9th ed.). New Jersey, USA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K., Goold, A., & Blain, J. (2004). Students’ pedagogical preferences in the delivery of IT capstone courses. Proceedings of Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference (pp. 431–442). Santa Rosa, Calif: Informing Science Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McCune, V., & Hounsell, D. (2005). The development of students’ ways of thinking and practicing in three final-year biology courses. Higher Education, 49, 255–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish, P. E. (2004). The trouble with learning objects. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 49–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. S. (1969). Knowing and being. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, J. S., Dodero, J. M., & Sanchez-Alonso, S. (2011). A preliminary analysis of software engineering metrics-based criteria for the evaluation of learning objects reusability. In J. L. Antonakos (Ed.), Data structure and software engineering: Challenges and improvements (pp. 53–66). New York, USA: Apple Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Artacho, M. (2004). Modeling educational content: The cognitive approach of the PALO language. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7, 124–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedrakyan, G., Snoeck, M., & Poelmans, S. (2014). Assessing the effectiveness of feedback enabled simulation in teaching conceptual modeling. Computers & Education, 78, 367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tono, L. (2011). Learning objects: Implications for instructional designers. International Journal of Instructional Media, 38, 253–260.
   Google Scholar