References
- Apostolova‐Mihaylova, M., Cooper, W., Hoyt, G., & Marshall, E. C. (2015). Heterogeneous gender effects under loss aversion in the economics classroom: A field experiment. Southern Economic Journal, 81, 980–994.
- Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable ssessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–167.
- Boud, D. & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/1347976.pdf
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.
- Creswell, J. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. London: Sage.
- DCU. (2013). Assessment and feedback in teaching and learning policy. Dublin: Author.
- Elkington, S. (2016). The case for transforming assessment in Higher Education. Scotland: Higher Education Academy.
- Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2009). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. Oxon: Routledge.
- Fryer, R. G., Jr, Levitt, S. D., List, J., & Sadoff, S. (2012). Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: A field experiment (No. w18237). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Hossain, T., & List, J. A. (2012). The behavioralist visits the factory: Increasing productivity using simple framing manipulations. Management Science, 58, 2151–2167.
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292.
- Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., Neckermann, S., & Sadoff, S. (2016). The behavioralist goes to school: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve educational performance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8, 183–219.
- Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 525–536.
- McEvoy, D. M. (2016). Loss aversion and student achievement. Economics Bulletin, 36, 1762–1770.
- National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. (2016). Students as partners. Dublin: National Forum. Retrieved from https://www.teachingandlearning.ie/publication/students-as-partners/.
- National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. (2017). Profile of assessment practices in Irish Higher Education. Dublin: National Forum. Retrieved from https://www.teachingandlearning.ie/publication/profile-of-assessment-practices-in-irish-higher-education/
- Newton, P. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education, 14, 149–170.
- Pope, D. G., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2011). Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. American Economic Review, 101, 129–157.
- Razi, S. (2015, April–June). Development of a rubric to assess academic writing incorporating. Sage Open, pp. 1–13.
- Teaching Enhancement Unit, DCU. (2018). Academic integrity principles. TEU Integrity Project. Retrieved from https://teuintegrityproject.wordpress.com/principles/
- Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276.
- Wang, X. H., & Yang, B. (2003). Why competition may discourage students from learning? A behavioral economic analysis. Education Economics, 11, 117–128.
- Wride, M. (2017). Guide to peer-assessment. Dublin: Trinity College. Retrieved from https://www.tcd.ie/CAPSL/assets/pdf/Academic%20Practice%20Resources/Guide%20to%20Student%20Peer%20Assessment.pdf