References
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
- Blayney, P., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2015). Using cognitive load theory to tailor instruction to levels of accounting students’ expertise. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 199–210. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.4.199
- Booth, J. L., Cooper, L. A., Donovan, M. S., Huyghe, A., Koedinger, K. R., & Par e-Blagoev, E. J. (2015). Design-based research within the constraints of practice: AlgebraByExample. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (Jespar), 20(1–2), 79–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.986674
- Borracci, G., Gauthier, E., Jennings, J., Sale, K., & Muldner, K. (2020). The effect of assistance on learning and affect in an algebra tutor. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 2032–2052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118822103
- Chen, O., & Kalyuga, S. (2020). Cognitive load theory, spacing effect, and working memory resources depletion: Implications for instructional design. In S. Hai-Jew (Ed.), Form, function, and style in instructional design: Emerging research and opportunities (pp. 1–26). IGI Global. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9833-6.ch001
- Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2016). When instructional guidance is needed. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 33(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2016.16
- Chen, O., Retnowati, E., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Effects of worked examples on step performance in solving complex problems. Educational Psychology, 39(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1515891
- Chen, O., Woolcott, G., & Sweller, J. (2017). Using cognitive load theory to structure computer‐based learning including MOOCs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(4), 293–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12188
- Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: Identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.920752
- Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2004). Designing instructional examples to reduce intrinsic cognitive load: Molar versus modular presentation of solution procedures. Instructional Science, 32(1–2), 33–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021809.10236.71
- Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12235
- Jennings, J., & Muldner, K. (2020). Assistance that fades in improves learning better than assistance that fades out. Instructional Science, 48(4), 371-394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09520-7
- Johnson, B., & Slayter, E. (2012). Impact of structure of early practice on student performance in transaction analysis. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50092
- Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 509–539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
- Kalyuga, S., & Singh, A. M. (2016). Rethinking the boundaries of cognitive load theory in complex learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 831–852. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9352-0
- Klepsch, M., & Seufert, T. (2020). Understanding instructional design effects by differentiated measurement of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Instructional Science, 48(1), 45–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09502-9
- Lange, C., & Costley, J. (2019). How sequencing and fading affects the relationship between intrinsic and germane cognitive loads. Distance Education, 40(2), 243–261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600366
- Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2019). Cognitive load theory, resource depletion and the delayed testing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 457–478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09476-2
- Lee, H. S., Betts, S., & Anderson, J. R. (2015). Not taking the easy road: When similarity hurts learning. Memory & Cognition, 43(6), 939–952. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0509-3
- Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1058–1072. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1
- Lu, J., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2020). Altering element interactivity and variability in example‐practice sequences to enhance learning to write Chinese characters. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(4), 837–843. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3668
- Malicka, A. (2018). The role of task sequencing in fluency, accuracy, and complexity: Investigating the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 642–665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1362168818813668
- Miller-Cotto, D., & Auxter, A. E. (2019).). Testing the ecological validity of faded worked examples in algebra. Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1646411
- Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
- Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2017). Can collaborative learning improve the effectiveness of worked examples in learning mathematics? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 666–679. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000167
- Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., Oppezzo, M. A., & Chin, D. B. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 759–775. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0025140
- Sentz, J., Stefaniak, J., Baaki, J., & Eckhoff, A. (2019). How do instructional designers manage learners’ cognitive load? An examination of awareness and application of strategies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 199–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09640-5
- Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
- Tawfik, A. A., Law, V., Ge, X., Xing, W., & Kim, K. (2018). The effect of sustained vs. faded scaffolding on students’ argumentation in ill-structured problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 436–449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.035
- Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: Design principles and strategies. Medical Education, 44(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x