References
- Boero, P. (1999). Argumentation and mathematical proof: A complex, productive, unavoidable relationship in mathematics and mathematics education. Preuve: International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof, July/August 1999. Mathematics Education. http://www.lettredelapreuve.it/OldPreuve/Newsletter/990708Theme/990708ThemeUK.html
- De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2008). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups by introducing roles: Do students act in line with assigned roles? Small Group Research, 39(6), 770–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408323227
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
- Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Open University Nederland.
- Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C., & Heo, H. (2020). A meta-analysis of scaffolding effects in online learning in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4638
- Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124(6), 689–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082
- Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748005
- Hanna, G., & Knipping, C. (2020). Proof in mathematics education, 1980–2020: An overview. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics,30(SP1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2020.08.sp.1.1
- Heinze, A., Reiss, K., & Rudolph, F. (2005). Mathematics achievement and interest in mathematics from a differential perspective. ZDM the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37(3), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-005-0011-7
- King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning—Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 13–37). Springer.
- Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
- Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. (2014). Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement. Learning and Instruction, 32, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.003
- Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43(6), 332–360. https://doi.org/10.1159/000022695
- O’Donnell, A. M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120–141). Cambridge University Press.
- Pease, A., Smaill, A., Colton, S., & Lee, J. (2009). Bridging the gap between argumentation theory and the philosophy of mathematics. Foundation of Science, 14(1–2), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-008-9150-y
- Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
- Prenzel, M., Eitel, F., Holzbach, R., Schoenheinz, R.-J., & Schweiberer, L. (1993). Lernmotivation im studentischen Unterricht in der Chirurgie. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 7(2–3), 125–137.
- Radkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020). Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 5–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09316-4
- Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., Tempelaar, D., Lygo-Baker, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2012). The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL. Computers & Education, 59(3), 893–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.010
- Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge University Press.
- Sommerhoff, D., Kollar, I., & Ufer, S. (2021). Supporting mathematical argumentation and proof skills: Comparing the effectiveness of a sequential and a concurrent instructional approach to support resource-based cognitive skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(572165), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572165
- Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2012). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5
- Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaborations? In L. B. Resnick, C. Pontecorvo, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences) (Vol. 160, pp. 361–384). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03362–3_16
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
- Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation the pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Reiss, K., & Fischer, F. (2016). Developing argumentation skills in mathematics through computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of transactivity. Instructional Science, 44(5), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9380-2
- Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7
- Wise, A. F., & Schwarz, B. B. (2017). Visions of CSCL: Eight provocations for the future of the field. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 423–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9267-5