References
- Avcı, Ü. (2020). Examining the role of sentence openers, role assignment scaffolds and self-determination in collaborative knowledge building. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09672-5
- Baker, J., Andriessen, M., & Schwarz, B. (2019). Collaborative argumentation-based learning. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), Routledge international handbook on dialogic education (pp. 76–88). Routledge.
- Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, -C.-C. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799–843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584
- Cho, K.-L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505022
- Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Open Universiteit Nederland.
- Ertmer, P., & Koehler, A. A. (2015). Facilitated versus non-facilitated online case discussions: Comparing differences in problem space coverage. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(2), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9094-5
- Felton, M., Crowell, A., & Liu, T. (2015a). Arguing to agree: Mitigating my-side bias through consensus-seeking dialogue. Written Communication, 32(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088315590788
- Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., Villarroel, C., & Gilabert, S. (2015b). Arguing collaboratively: Argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12078
- Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: North American edition. SAGE.
- Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504515
- Ge, X., Planas, L., & Er, N. (2010). A cognitive support system to scaffold students’ problem-based learning in a web-based learning environment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1093
- Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431. https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
- Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772
- Hew, K. F., Cheung, W. S., & Ng, C. S. L. (2010). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Science, 38(6), 571–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9087-0
- Ju, H., & Choi, I. (2017). The role of argumentation in hypothetico-deductive reasoning during problem-based learning in medical education: A conceptual framework. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1638
- Law, V., Ge, X., & Huang, K. (2020). Understanding learners’ challenges and scaffolding their ill-structured problem solving in a technology-supported self-regulated learning environment. In Bishop M.J., Boling E., Elen J., Svihla V. (Ed.),In Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (pp. 321–343). Springer.
- Lazonder, A., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
- Lin, F., & Chan, C. K. K. (2018). Examining the role of computer-supported knowledge-building discourse in epistemic and conceptual understanding. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12261
- Lobczowski, N. G. (2020). Bridging gaps and moving forward: Building a new model for socioemotional formation and regulation. Educational Psychologist, 55(2), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1670064
- Loyens, S., & Rikers, R. (2011). Instruction based on inquiry. In R. Mayer & R. Rikers (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 361–381). Routledge Press.
- Lucas, M., Gunawardena, C., & Moreira, A. (2014). Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050
- Ng, C. S. L., & Tan, C. (2006). Investigating Singapore pre-service teachers’ ill-structured problem-solving processes in an asynchronous online environment: Implications for reflective thinking. New Horizons in Education, 54, 1–15.
- Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2019). The effects of online peer feedback and epistemic beliefs on students’ argumentation-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1431143
- Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2017). Promoting argumentation competence: Extending from first- to second-order scaffolding through adaptive fading. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z
- Oh, S., & Jonassen, D. H. (2007). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00206.x
- Radkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020). Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 5–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09316-4
- Ringler, I., Schubert, C., Deem, J., Flores, J., Friestad-Tate, J., & Lockwood, R. (2015). Improving the asynchronous online learning environment using discussion boards. I-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.1.3432
- Shan, G., & Gerstenberger, S. (2017). Fisher’s exact approach for post hoc analysis of a chi-squared test. PloS One, 12(12), e0188709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188709
- Tawfik, A. A., Law, V., Ge, X., Xing, W., & Kim, K. (2018). The effect of sustained vs. faded scaffolding on students’ argumentation in ill-structured problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.035
- Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., & Weinberger, A. (2015). Scripts, individual preparation and group awareness support in the service of learning in Facebook: How does CSCL compare to social networking sites? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.067
- Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., & Weinberger, A. (2017). Fisher’s exact approach for post hoc analysis of a chi-squared test. PLOS ONE, 52, 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188709
- Tsovaltzi, D., Rummel, N., McLaren, B. M., Pinkwart, N., Scheuer, O., Harrer, A., & Braun, I. (2010). Extending a virtual chemistry laboratory with a collaboration script to promote conceptual learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1–2), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2010.031262
- Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2019). The effects of an online learning environment with worked examples and peer feedback on students’ argumentative essay writing and domain-specific knowledge acquisition in the field of biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1472132
- Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7
- Wang, H.-C., Rosé, C. P., & Chang, C.-Y. (2011). Agent-based dynamic support for learning from collaborative brainstorming in scientific inquiry. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9124-x
- Wang, M., Wu, B., Kinshuk, C. N.-S., & Spector, J. M. (2013). Connecting problem-solving and knowledge-construction processes in a visualization-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 68, 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.004
- Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2014). Where is the evidence? A meta-analysis on the role of argumentation for the acquisition of domain-specific knowledge in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 75, 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.016
- Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4
- Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003
- Wolfe, C. R., & Britt, M. A. (2008). The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation. Thinking & Reasoning, 14(1), 1–27.
- Ge, X., & Land, S. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504836