The ideal research degree supervisor ‘can play any role’: Rethinking institutional orientation and induction for commencing doctoral students

References

• ACGR (Australian Council for Graduate Research). (2018). ACGR guidelines for quality graduate research supervision. https://www.acgr.edu.au/good-practice/best-practice/
   Google Scholar
• Azure, J. (2016). Students’ perspective of effective supervision of graduate programmes in Ghana. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-2-4
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B., Williams, E., & Archer, S. (2010). Characteristics that matter most: Doctoral students’ perceptions of positive and negative advisor attributes. NACADA Journal, 30(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.12930/0271-9517-30.1.34
   Google Scholar
• Baydarova, I., Collins, H. E., & Ait Saadi, I. (2021). Alignment of doctoral student and supervisor expectations in Malaysia. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.28945/4682
   Google Scholar
• Cardilini, A., Risely, A., & Richardson, M. (2022). Supervising the PhD: Identifying common mismatches in expectations between candidate and supervisor to improve research training outcomes. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(3), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1874887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. (2020). The ideal supervisor from the candidate’s perspective: What qualities do students actually want? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(9), 1220–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1669772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2014). Navigating change: A typology of student transition in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 734–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.721351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruzdev, I., Terentev, E., & Dzhafarova, Z. (2020). Superhero or hands-off supervisor? An empirical categorization of PhD supervision styles and student satisfaction in Russian universities. Higher Education, 79(5), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00437-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A., Shaw, K., Scevak, J., Bourke, S., Cantwell, R., & Budd, J. (2014). PhD candidate expectations: Exploring mismatch with experience. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 329–346. https://doi.org/10.28945/2078
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2019). Doctoral supervisory quality from the perspective of senior academic managers. Australian Universities Review, 61(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.222528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, S., & Ismail, I. (2010). PhD students’ experiences of thesis supervision in Malaysia: Managing relationships in the midst of institutional change. The Qualitative Report, 15(4), 802–822. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol15/iss4/3
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C., & Wealer, C. (2021). Intentions, concepts and conceptions of research supervision: A consideration of three disciplines. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1900815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2018). How can we develop supervisors for the modern doctorate? Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 878–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Bongaardt, R. (eds.). (2021). The future of doctoral research: Challenges and opportunities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., Dennis, C., & Campbell, P. (2007). Nature’s guide for mentors. Nature, 447(7146), 791–797. https://doi.org/10.1038/447791a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2005). Early warning signs in postgraduate research education: A different approach to ensuring timely completions. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251042000337963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, A. (2013). The quest for the PhD:A better metaphor for doctoral education. International Journal for Researcher Development, 4(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRD-05-2013-0008
   Google Scholar
• Moxham, L., Dwyer, T., & Reid-Searl, K. (2013). Articulating expectations for PhD candidature upon commencement: Ensuring supervisor/student ‘best fit’. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(4), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.812030
   Google Scholar
• Oxford University. (2020). https://www.ox.ac.uk/admissions/graduate/courses/interdisciplinary-bioscience
   Google Scholar
• Peseta, T., Kligyte, G., Bell, A., Hardiman, B., Leadbeatter, D., Pizzica, J., Saliba, G., Salisbury, F., Thomson, K., & Yucel, R. (2021). Borders, paths and orientations: Assembling the higher education research field as doctoral students and supervisors. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(3), 422–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1885022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QAA (Quality Assurance Agency). (2004). Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. In Section 1: Postgraduate research programmes. QAA.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. L. (2005). Group Differences in graduate students’ concepts of the ideal mentor. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-6289-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzburg, I. I. R. (2010). European universities’ achievements since 2005 in implementing the Salzburg Principles. European Universities Association Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Kiley, M., & Holley, K. (2020). The making of doctoral supervisors: International case studies of practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tobbell, J., & O’Donnell, V. (2013). Transition to postgraduate study: Postgraduate ecological systems and identity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2012.749215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobbell, J., O’Donnell, V., & Zammit, M. (2010). Exploring transition to postgraduate study: Shifting identities in interaction with communities, practice and participation. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902836360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UniSA. 2022. (University of South Australia). The transformed PhD. https://www.unisa.edu.au/research/degrees/tphd/
   Google Scholar
• Wei, J., Carter, S., & Laurs, D. (2019). Handling the loss of innocence: First-time exchange of writing and feedback in doctoral supervision. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(1), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1541074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., Golde, C. M., & McCormick, A. C. (2007). More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701424983
   Google Scholar