1,688
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The changing landscape of doctoral education: A framework for analysis and introduction to the special issue

ORCID Icon

References

  • Allen, M., Smyth, E., & Walhstrom, M. (2002). Responding to the field and to the academy: Ontario’s evolving PhD. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360220144114
  • Andres, L., Bengtsen, S., Castana, L., Crossouard, B., Keefer, J., & Pyhalto, K. (2015). Drivers and interpretations of doctoral education today: National comparisons. Frontline Learning Research, 3(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i3.177
  • Archbald, D. (2011). The emergence of the non-traditional doctorate: A historical overview. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 129(129), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.396
  • Ash, M. (2006). Bachelor of what, master of whom? The Humboldt myth and historical transformations of higher education in German-speaking Europe and the US. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00258.x
  • Baker, S. (2019. January, 13). New blood: Which nations’ academics are the most youthful? Times Higher Education, 20–21.
  • Banks, M., & Bhandari, R. (2012). Global student mobility. In D. Deardoff, H. De Wit, J. Heyl, & T. Adams (Eds.), Sage handbook of international higher education (pp. 379–397). Sage.
  • Barry, K., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Sirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates: Study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(3), 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979
  • Benjamin, S., Williams, J., & Maher, M. (2017). Focusing the lens to share the story: Using photographs and interviews to explore doctoral students’ sense of well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 197–217. https://doi.org/10.28945/3862
  • Bienkowska, D., & Klofsten, M. (2012). Creating entrepreneurial networks: Academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education. Higher Education, 64(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9488-x
  • Bitusikova, A. (2010a). Doctoral education in Europe: Trends and perspectives. Communications in Agriculture and Applied Biological Sciences, 75(1), 23–28.
  • Bitusikova, A. (2010b). Master and doctoral education in Europe.: Key challenges for quality assurance. In Quality assurance in postgraduate education. European Association for Quality Assurance.
  • Blackmore, K., & Nesbitt, K. (2008, January 1) Identifying risks for cross-disciplinary higher degree research students. Tenth Australian Computing Education Conference (ACE2008) Wollongong Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, Wollongong (Vol. 78, pp. 43–52).
  • Blaume, S., & Amsterdamsaka, O. (1987). Postgraduate Education in the 1980s. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Boden, D., Borrego, L., & Newswander, L. (2011). Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education. Higher Education, 62(6), 741–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9415-1
  • Bohrer, J. (2010). Quality assurance at doctoral level: The case of England, UK. In Quality assurance in postgraduate education. European Association for Quality Assurance.
  • Bourke, S., Hattie, J., & Anderson, L. (2004). Predicting examiner recommendations on PhD theses. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.04.012
  • Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstein, N. L. (1992). In Pursuit of the PhD. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400862474
  • Byrne, J., Jorgensen, T., & Loukkola, T. (2013). Quality assurance in doctoral education – results of the ARDE project. European University Association. http://www.eua.be/publications/eua-reports-and-studies.aspx.
  • Campbell, S. P., Fuller, A. K., & Patrick, D. A. G. (2005). Looking beyond research in doctoral education. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(3), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0153:LBRIDE]2.0.CO;2
  • Connelly, J. (2000). The Sovietisation of East German, Czech and Polish higher education 1945-56;. University of North Carolina Press.
  • Cumerma, A. (2018. February, 1). Smart people problems: We need to talk about PhD mental health. Times Higher Education, 32.
  • Cuthbert, D., & Molla, T. (2014). PhD crisis discourse: A critical approach to the framing of the problem and some Australian ‘solutions’. Higher Education, 69(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9760-y
  • Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). Education: The PhD factory. Nature, 472(7343), 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1038/472276a
  • Dahan, A. (2007). Supervision and schizophrenia: The professional identity of PhD supervisors and the mission of student professionalism. European Journal of Education, 42(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00310.x
  • Dann, S. (2008). Applying services marketing principles to postgraduate supervision. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880810906481
  • Denicolo, P., Duke, D., & Reeves, J. (2020). Delivering inspiring doctoral assessment. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526483119
  • De Weert, E. (2004). The Netherlands. In J. Sadak, (Ed.), Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the US: Status and prospects (pp. 77–97). UNESCO. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/doctoral-education-in-the-netherlands-between-uniformity-and-dive
  • Dowling, R., Gorman Murray, A., Power, E., & Luzia, K. (2012). Critical reflections on doctoral research and supervision in human geography: The ‘PhD by publication. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2011.638368
  • Elgar, R. J., & Klein, R. M. (2004). What you don’t know: Graduate Deans’ knowledge of doctoral completion rates. Higher Education Policy, 17(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300059
  • Elliot, D., Bengstsen, S., Guccione, K., & Kobayashi, S. (2020). The hidden curriculum in doctoral education. Palgrave-Macmillan E-book. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41497-9
  • Gardner, S., Jansujwicz, J., Hutchins, K., Cline, B., & Levesque, V. (2012). Interdisciplinary doctoral student socialization. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 377–394. https://doi.org/10.28945/1743
  • Gardner, S., Jansujwicz, J., Hutchins, K., Cline, B., & Levesque, V. (2014). Socialization to interdisciplinarity: Faculty and student perspectives. Higher Education, 67(3), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9648-2
  • Golde, C. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0039
  • Gonzalez-Ocampo, G., & Badia, M. (2019). Research on doctoral supervision; what we have learnt in the past ten years. In T. Machin, M. Clara, & P. Danaher (Eds.), Traversing the doctorate: Reflections and strategies from students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 117–142). e-Book, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Grant, B. (2005). Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500082483
  • Grennan, S. (2015). Arts practice and research: Locating alterity and expertise. Journal of Art and Design Education, 34(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.1776
  • Group of Eight. (2013). The changing PhD: Discussion paper. https://www.acgr.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/the-changing-phd_final-G08.pdf
  • Guerin, C., & Green, I. (2013). ‘They’re the bosses’: Feedback in team supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2013.831039
  • Guerin, C., Green, I., & Bastalich, W. (2011). Big love: Managing a team of research supervisors. In V. Kumar & A. Lee (Eds.), Doctoral education in international context: Connecting local, regional and global perspectives (pp. 138–153). Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
  • Guthrie, S., Lichten, C., van Belle, J., Ball, S., Knosck, A., & Hofman, J. (2017). Understanding mental health in the research environment. Rand. https://www.rand.org/randeurope/research/projects/researcher-mental-health.html, https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2022
  • Hakkarainen, K., Hytonen, K., Makkonen, J., & Lehtinen, E. (2016). Extending collective practices of doctoral education from natural to educational sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914910
  • Halliday, D., & Kiley, M. (2016) What are the characteristics of an effective interdisciplinary research environment. In D. Halliday & G. Clark (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2ndInternational Conference on developments in doctoral education and training, 2015, March 15, University of Oxford (pp. 10–17). UK Council for Graduate Education.
  • Halse, C., & Mowbray, S. (2011). The impact of the doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
  • Hammond, J., Ryland, K., Tennant, M., & Boud, D. (2010). Building research supervision and training across Australian Universities. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/327672
  • Hasgall, A., Saenen, B., & Borrell-Damian, L. (2019). Doctoral education in Europe today: Approaches and institutional structures. European Universities Association Council for Doctoral Education. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/809:doctoral-education-in-europe-today- approaches-and-institutional-structures.html
  • Huang, F. (2017). From the former Soviet patterns towards the US model: Changes in Chinese doctoral education. Centre for global higher education working Paper Number 12. University College London Institute of Education. http://www.researchcghe.org/publications/from-the-former-soviet-patterns-towards-the-us-model-changes-in-chinese-doctoral-education/
  • Jackson, D. (2013). Completing a PhD by publication: A review of Australian policy and implications for practice. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.692666
  • Jakopovic, I., & Borosic, I. (2010). Quality assurance of doctoral study programmes in Croatia. In A. Bitusikova, J. Bohere, I. Borosic, N. Costes, K. Edinsel, K. Hollander, G. Jacabsson, I. F. Jakopovic, M. L. Kearney, F. Muder, J. Negyesi, & M. Pietzonka, (Eds.), Quality assurance in postgraduate education (pp. 58–63). European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. https://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/ENQA-workshop- report- 12.pdf:
  • Johnson, L., Alison, L., & Green, B. (2000). The PhD and the autonomous self; gender, rationality, and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696141
  • Joyner, R. (2003). The selection of external examiners for research degrees. Quality in Higher Education, 11(2), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880310471551
  • Kearney, M.-L. (2010). Forces sharing postgraduate education: Academic credentials in a global context. In A. Bitusikova, J. Bohrer, I. Boroši´c, N. Costes, K. Edinsel, K. Holländer, G. Jacobsson, I. F. Jakopovi´c, M.-L. Kearney, F. Mulder, J. Négyesi, & M. Pietzonka, (Eds.), Quality assurance in postgraduate education (pp. 9–17). European Association for Quality Assurance. https://www.enqa.eu/wp- content/uploads/ENQA-workshop-report-12.pdf
  • Kehm, B. M. (2004). Developing doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe: Good practice and issues of concern – a comparative analysis. In J. Sadak (Ed.), Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the US: Status and prospects (pp. 279–298). UNESCO.
  • Kiley, M. (2009). ‘You don’t want a smart Alec’: Selecting examiners to assess doctoral dissertations. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 889–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802713112
  • Kiley, M. (2011). Government policy and research degree higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 33(6), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2011.621189
  • Kiley, M. (2014). Coursework in Australian doctoral education: What’s happening, why and future directions?. Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching, Australian National University.
  • Kivisto, J., Pekkola, E., & Siekken, T. (2017). Latest reforms in Finnish doctoral education in light of recent European developments. European Journal of Higher Education, 7(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1290881
  • Kolmos, A., Kofoed, B., & Du, X. (2008). PhD students’ work conditions and study environment in university- and industry-based PhD programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790802588383
  • Kot, F., & Hendel, D. (2011). Emergence and growth of professional doctorates in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia: A comparative analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.516356
  • Kovacevic, M., Bitusikova, A., & Dagen, T. (2022). Emergence of current European thinking and policies on doctoral education. European Journal of Education, 57(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/101111/ejed.12515
  • Kumar, S., Kumar, V., & Taylor, S. (2019). A guide to online supervision. UK Council for Graduate Education. https://ukcge.ac.uk/assets/resources/A-Guide-to-Online-Supervision-Kumar-Kumar-Taylor-UK-Council-for-Graduate-Education.pdf
  • Lee, A. (2022). Successful research supervision (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelear, A., Van der Hayden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy, 46(4), 868–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
  • Maher, M., Ford, E., & Thompson, C. (2004). Degree progress of women doctoral students: Factors that constrain, facilitate, and differentiate. The Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2004.0003
  • Manathunga, C. (2012). Supervisors watching supervisors: The deconstructive possibilities and tensions of team supervision. Australian Universities Review, 54(1), 29–37.
  • Manathunga, C. L. P, & Lant, P., Mellick, G. (2006). Imagining an interdisciplinary doctoral pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680954
  • Manathunga, C., Pitt, R., & Critchley, C. (2009). Graduate attribute development and employment outcomes: Tracking PhD graduates. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955945
  • Maor, D., Ensor, J., & Fraser, B. (2015). Doctoral supervision in virtual spaces: A review of research of web-based tools to develop collaborative supervision. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(1), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1121206
  • Marais, G., Shankland, R., Haag, P., Fiault, R., & Juniper, B. (2017). A positive psychology study and intervention on the well-being of French PhD students in biology. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 109–138. https://doi.org/10.28945/3948
  • McCulloch, A., & Thomas, L. (2012). Widening participation to doctoral education and research degrees: A research agenda for an emerging policy area. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.662630
  • McGloin, R., & Wynne, C. (2015). Structural changes in doctoral education in the UK: A Review of graduate schools and the development of doctoral colleges. UK Council for Graduate Education.
  • Mendoza, P. (2007). Academic capitalism and doctoral student socialization: A case study. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2007.0004
  • Metcalfe, J., Wilson, S., & Levecque, K. (2018). Exploring wellbeing and mental health and associated support services for postgraduate researchers. Vitae, Careers Research and Advisory Centre Ltd. https://re.ukri.org/documents/2018/mental-health-report/
  • Mogueron, P. (2005). Doctoral and postdoctoral education in science and engineering: Europe in the international competition. European Journal of Education, 40(4), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2005.00234.x
  • Negyesi, J. (2010). Accreditation of doctoral schools in hungary. In A. Bitusikova, J. Bohrer, I. Boroši´c, N. Costes, K. Edinsel, K. Holländer, G. Jacobsson, I. F. Jakopovi´c, M.-L. Kearney, F. Mulder, J. Négyesi, & M. Pietzonka (Eds.), Quality assurance in postgraduate education (pp. 50–63). European Association for Quality Assurance.
  • Nerad, M. (2020). Doctoral education worldwide: Three decades of change. In M. Yudkevich, P. Altbach, & H. de Wit (Eds.), Trends and issues in doctoral education: A global perspective (pp. 33–52). Sage.
  • Neumann, R., & Tan, K. (2011). From PhD to initial employment: The doctorate in a knowledge economy. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594596
  • Niven, P., & Grant, C. (2012). PhDs by publications: An easy way out? Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.640086
  • Nybom, T. (2003). The humboldt legacy: Reflections on the past, present and future of the European University. Higher Education Policy, 16(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300013
  • OECD. (2019) Education at a Glance. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2019_f8d7880d-en
  • Offerman, M. (2011). Profile of the non-traditional doctoral degree student. New Directions in Adult and Continuing Education, 2011(129), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.397
  • Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., Ravelli, L., & Nicholson, S. (2011). Doctoral writing is the visual and performing arts: Two ends of a continuum. Studies in Higher Education, 37(8), 989–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.562285
  • Park, C. (2007). Redefining the doctorate. Higher Education Academy. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/435/1/RedefiningTheDoctorate.pdf
  • Pederson, H. (2014). New doctoral graduates in the knowledge economy: Trends and key issues. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 36(6), 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.957891
  • Petersen, E. (2012). Re-signifying subjectivity? A narrative exploration of ‘non-traditional’ doctoral students’ lived experience of subject formation through two Australian cases. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 823–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.745337
  • Pietzonka, M. (2010). Quality assurance of doctoral education in Germany –experiences, standards and challenges. In A. Bitusikova, J. Bohere, I. Borosic, N. Costes, K. Edinsel, K. Hollander, G. Jacabsson, I. F. Jakopovic, M. L. Kearney, F. Muder, J. Negyesi, & M. Pietzonka (Eds.), Quality assurance in postgraduate education (pp. 46–49). https://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/ENQA-workshop-report-12.pdf
  • Powell, S., & Green, H. (2007). The doctorate world wide. Society for Research Into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  • Sarrico, C. (2022). The expansion of doctoral education and the changing nature and purpose of the doctorate. Higher Education, 84(6), 1299–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00946-1
  • Sense, A. (2016). Work-based research degrees: Systematic cultivation through a University-industry network space. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966665
  • Shakni, I., Inouye, K., & McAlpine, L. (2021). PhD holders entering non-academic workplaces: Organisational culture shock. Studies in Higher Education, 47(6), 1271–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1876650
  • Shin, J. C., Kehm, B., & Jones, G. (2018). The increasing importance, growth and evolution of doctoral education. In J. C. Shin, B. Kehm, & G. Jones (Eds.), Doctoral education for the knowledge society (pp. 1–12). E-book, Springer.
  • Siggaard Jensen, H. (2007). Doctoral education in Denmark. In S. Powell & H. Green (Eds.), The doctorate worldwide (pp. 19–28). Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  • Simpson, R. (1983). How the PhD came to Britain. Society for Research into Higher Education.
  • Simpson, R. (2009). The development of the PhD degree in Britain, 1917-1959, and since. The Edmund Mellon Press.
  • Smolentseva, A., Huisman, J., Froumin, I., Huisman, J., Smolentseva, A., & Froumin, I. (2018). 25 years of transformations of higher education systems in post-Soviet countries. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.palgrave.com/gb/book/9783319529790, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52980-6
  • Taylor, J. (2008). Quality and standards: The challenge of the professional doctorate. Higher Education in Europe, 33(1), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720802228191
  • Taylor, S. (2012). Changes in doctoral education: Implications for supervisors in developing early career researchers. International Journal of Researcher Development, 3(2), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511311316973
  • Taylor, S. (2014). Towards a framework for the professional development of doctoral supervisors. SDF Digest: A Practitioner Journal for HE Staff Development, 2, 74–87.
  • Taylor, S. (2021). Towards describing the doctoral education landscape. UK Council for Graduate Education. http://www.ukcge.ac.uk/article/towards-global-doctoral-landscape-475.aspx
  • Taylor, S., Kiley, M., & Humphrey, R. (2018). A handbook for doctoral supervisors. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315559650
  • Thornley, C. (2017). Not by degrees: Improving students’ mental health in the UK’s universities. Institute for Public Policy Research. https://www.ippr.org/publications/not-by-degrees
  • Thule, T. (2009). Doctoral students on the university–industry interface: A review of the literature. Higher Education, 58(5), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9214-0
  • Trafford, V., & Lesham, S. (2008). Stepping stones to achieving your doctorate. Open University Press.
  • Ulhoi, J. (2005). Postgraduate education in Europe: An intersection of conflicting paradigms and goals. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(4), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540510599662
  • UNESCO. (2019). Higher Education Statistics. http://uis.unesco.org/en/topic/higher-education
  • Watson, P. (2010). The German genius. Simon and Schuster.
  • Watts, J. (2010). Team supervision of the doctorate: Managing roles, relationships and contradictions. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), 335–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003740908
  • Winfield, G. (1987). The social science PhD: The ESRC enquiry into submission rates. Economic and Social Research Council.
  • Zhao, F. (2003). Transforming quality in research supervision: A knowledge-management approach. Quality in Higher Education, 9(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320308149
  • Zusman, A. (2013, July 6). What’s driving the new professional doctorates? University World News: Issue 279, http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20130704133923315&