The changing landscape of doctoral education: A framework for analysis and introduction to the special issue

References

• Allen, M., Smyth, E., & Walhstrom, M. (2002). Responding to the field and to the academy: Ontario’s evolving PhD. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360220144114
   Google Scholar
• Andres, L., Bengtsen, S., Castana, L., Crossouard, B., Keefer, J., & Pyhalto, K. (2015). Drivers and interpretations of doctoral education today: National comparisons. Frontline Learning Research, 3(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i3.177
   Google Scholar
• Archbald, D. (2011). The emergence of the non-traditional doctorate: A historical overview. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 129(129), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.396
   Google Scholar
• Ash, M. (2006). Bachelor of what, master of whom? The Humboldt myth and historical transformations of higher education in German-speaking Europe and the US. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00258.x
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. (2019. January, 13). New blood: Which nations’ academics are the most youthful? Times Higher Education, 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, M., & Bhandari, R. (2012). Global student mobility. In D. Deardoff, H. De Wit, J. Heyl, & T. Adams (Eds.), Sage handbook of international higher education (pp. 379–397). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, K., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Sirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates: Study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(3), 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, S., Williams, J., & Maher, M. (2017). Focusing the lens to share the story: Using photographs and interviews to explore doctoral students’ sense of well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 197–217. https://doi.org/10.28945/3862
   Google Scholar
• Bienkowska, D., & Klofsten, M. (2012). Creating entrepreneurial networks: Academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education. Higher Education, 64(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9488-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitusikova, A. (2010a). Doctoral education in Europe: Trends and perspectives. Communications in Agriculture and Applied Biological Sciences, 75(1), 23–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bitusikova, A. (2010b). Master and doctoral education in Europe.: Key challenges for quality assurance. In Quality assurance in postgraduate education. European Association for Quality Assurance.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, K., & Nesbitt, K. (2008, January 1) Identifying risks for cross-disciplinary higher degree research students. Tenth Australian Computing Education Conference (ACE2008) Wollongong Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, Wollongong (Vol. 78, pp. 43–52).
   Google Scholar
• Blaume, S., & Amsterdamsaka, O. (1987). Postgraduate Education in the 1980s. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, D., Borrego, L., & Newswander, L. (2011). Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education. Higher Education, 62(6), 741–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9415-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohrer, J. (2010). Quality assurance at doctoral level: The case of England, UK. In Quality assurance in postgraduate education. European Association for Quality Assurance.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, S., Hattie, J., & Anderson, L. (2004). Predicting examiner recommendations on PhD theses. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.04.012
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstein, N. L. (1992). In Pursuit of the PhD. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400862474
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., Jorgensen, T., & Loukkola, T. (2013). Quality assurance in doctoral education – results of the ARDE project. European University Association. http://www.eua.be/publications/eua-reports-and-studies.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. P., Fuller, A. K., & Patrick, D. A. G. (2005). Looking beyond research in doctoral education. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(3), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0153:LBRIDE]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, J. (2000). The Sovietisation of East German, Czech and Polish higher education 1945-56;. University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cumerma, A. (2018. February, 1). Smart people problems: We need to talk about PhD mental health. Times Higher Education, 32.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, D., & Molla, T. (2014). PhD crisis discourse: A critical approach to the framing of the problem and some Australian ‘solutions’. Higher Education, 69(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9760-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). Education: The PhD factory. Nature, 472(7343), 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1038/472276a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahan, A. (2007). Supervision and schizophrenia: The professional identity of PhD supervisors and the mission of student professionalism. European Journal of Education, 42(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00310.x
   Google Scholar
• Dann, S. (2008). Applying services marketing principles to postgraduate supervision. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880810906481
   Google Scholar
• Denicolo, P., Duke, D., & Reeves, J. (2020). Delivering inspiring doctoral assessment. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526483119
   Google Scholar
• De Weert, E. (2004). The Netherlands. In J. Sadak, (Ed.), Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the US: Status and prospects (pp. 77–97). UNESCO. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/doctoral-education-in-the-netherlands-between-uniformity-and-dive
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, R., Gorman Murray, A., Power, E., & Luzia, K. (2012). Critical reflections on doctoral research and supervision in human geography: The ‘PhD by publication. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2011.638368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgar, R. J., & Klein, R. M. (2004). What you don’t know: Graduate Deans’ knowledge of doctoral completion rates. Higher Education Policy, 17(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300059
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, D., Bengstsen, S., Guccione, K., & Kobayashi, S. (2020). The hidden curriculum in doctoral education. Palgrave-Macmillan E-book. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41497-9
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S., Jansujwicz, J., Hutchins, K., Cline, B., & Levesque, V. (2012). Interdisciplinary doctoral student socialization. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 377–394. https://doi.org/10.28945/1743
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S., Jansujwicz, J., Hutchins, K., Cline, B., & Levesque, V. (2014). Socialization to interdisciplinarity: Faculty and student perspectives. Higher Education, 67(3), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9648-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golde, C. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Ocampo, G., & Badia, M. (2019). Research on doctoral supervision; what we have learnt in the past ten years. In T. Machin, M. Clara, & P. Danaher (Eds.), Traversing the doctorate: Reflections and strategies from students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 117–142). e-Book, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. (2005). Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500082483
   Google Scholar
• Grennan, S. (2015). Arts practice and research: Locating alterity and expertise. Journal of Art and Design Education, 34(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.1776
   Google Scholar
• Group of Eight. (2013). The changing PhD: Discussion paper. https://www.acgr.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/the-changing-phd_final-G08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., & Green, I. (2013). ‘They’re the bosses’: Feedback in team supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2013.831039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., Green, I., & Bastalich, W. (2011). Big love: Managing a team of research supervisors. In V. Kumar & A. Lee (Eds.), Doctoral education in international context: Connecting local, regional and global perspectives (pp. 138–153). Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S., Lichten, C., van Belle, J., Ball, S., Knosck, A., & Hofman, J. (2017). Understanding mental health in the research environment. Rand. https://www.rand.org/randeurope/research/projects/researcher-mental-health.html, https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2022
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., Hytonen, K., Makkonen, J., & Lehtinen, E. (2016). Extending collective practices of doctoral education from natural to educational sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, D., & Kiley, M. (2016) What are the characteristics of an effective interdisciplinary research environment. In D. Halliday & G. Clark (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2ndInternational Conference on developments in doctoral education and training, 2015, March 15, University of Oxford (pp. 10–17). UK Council for Graduate Education.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, C., & Mowbray, S. (2011). The impact of the doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J., Ryland, K., Tennant, M., & Boud, D. (2010). Building research supervision and training across Australian Universities. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/327672
   Google Scholar
• Hasgall, A., Saenen, B., & Borrell-Damian, L. (2019). Doctoral education in Europe today: Approaches and institutional structures. European Universities Association Council for Doctoral Education. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/809:doctoral-education-in-europe-today- approaches-and-institutional-structures.html
   Google Scholar
• Huang, F. (2017). From the former Soviet patterns towards the US model: Changes in Chinese doctoral education. Centre for global higher education working Paper Number 12. University College London Institute of Education. http://www.researchcghe.org/publications/from-the-former-soviet-patterns-towards-the-us-model-changes-in-chinese-doctoral-education/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. (2013). Completing a PhD by publication: A review of Australian policy and implications for practice. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.692666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakopovic, I., & Borosic, I. (2010). Quality assurance of doctoral study programmes in Croatia. In A. Bitusikova, J. Bohere, I. Borosic, N. Costes, K. Edinsel, K. Hollander, G. Jacabsson, I. F. Jakopovic, M. L. Kearney, F. Muder, J. Negyesi, & M. Pietzonka, (Eds.), Quality assurance in postgraduate education (pp. 58–63). European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. https://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/ENQA-workshop- report- 12.pdf:
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Alison, L., & Green, B. (2000). The PhD and the autonomous self; gender, rationality, and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyner, R. (2003). The selection of external examiners for research degrees. Quality in Higher Education, 11(2), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880310471551
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M.-L. (2010). Forces sharing postgraduate education: Academic credentials in a global context. In A. Bitusikova, J. Bohrer, I. Boroši´c, N. Costes, K. Edinsel, K. Holländer, G. Jacobsson, I. F. Jakopovi´c, M.-L. Kearney, F. Mulder, J. Négyesi, & M. Pietzonka, (Eds.), Quality assurance in postgraduate education (pp. 9–17). European Association for Quality Assurance. https://www.enqa.eu/wp- content/uploads/ENQA-workshop-report-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. M. (2004). Developing doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe: Good practice and issues of concern – a comparative analysis. In J. Sadak (Ed.), Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the US: Status and prospects (pp. 279–298). UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2009). ‘You don’t want a smart Alec’: Selecting examiners to assess doctoral dissertations. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 889–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802713112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2011). Government policy and research degree higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 33(6), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2011.621189
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2014). Coursework in Australian doctoral education: What’s happening, why and future directions?. Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Kivisto, J., Pekkola, E., & Siekken, T. (2017). Latest reforms in Finnish doctoral education in light of recent European developments. European Journal of Higher Education, 7(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1290881
   Google Scholar
• Kolmos, A., Kofoed, B., & Du, X. (2008). PhD students’ work conditions and study environment in university- and industry-based PhD programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790802588383
   Google Scholar
• Kot, F., & Hendel, D. (2011). Emergence and growth of professional doctorates in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia: A comparative analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.516356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacevic, M., Bitusikova, A., & Dagen, T. (2022). Emergence of current European thinking and policies on doctoral education. European Journal of Education, 57(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/101111/ejed.12515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Kumar, V., & Taylor, S. (2019). A guide to online supervision. UK Council for Graduate Education. https://ukcge.ac.uk/assets/resources/A-Guide-to-Online-Supervision-Kumar-Kumar-Taylor-UK-Council-for-Graduate-Education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2022). Successful research supervision (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelear, A., Van der Hayden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy, 46(4), 868–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, M., Ford, E., & Thompson, C. (2004). Degree progress of women doctoral students: Factors that constrain, facilitate, and differentiate. The Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2004.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2012). Supervisors watching supervisors: The deconstructive possibilities and tensions of team supervision. Australian Universities Review, 54(1), 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. L. P, & Lant, P., Mellick, G. (2006). Imagining an interdisciplinary doctoral pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., Pitt, R., & Critchley, C. (2009). Graduate attribute development and employment outcomes: Tracking PhD graduates. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor, D., Ensor, J., & Fraser, B. (2015). Doctoral supervision in virtual spaces: A review of research of web-based tools to develop collaborative supervision. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(1), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1121206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, G., Shankland, R., Haag, P., Fiault, R., & Juniper, B. (2017). A positive psychology study and intervention on the well-being of French PhD students in biology. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 109–138. https://doi.org/10.28945/3948
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, A., & Thomas, L. (2012). Widening participation to doctoral education and research degrees: A research agenda for an emerging policy area. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.662630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGloin, R., & Wynne, C. (2015). Structural changes in doctoral education in the UK: A Review of graduate schools and the development of doctoral colleges. UK Council for Graduate Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, P. (2007). Academic capitalism and doctoral student socialization: A case study. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2007.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., Wilson, S., & Levecque, K. (2018). Exploring wellbeing and mental health and associated support services for postgraduate researchers. Vitae, Careers Research and Advisory Centre Ltd. https://re.ukri.org/documents/2018/mental-health-report/
   Google Scholar
• Mogueron, P. (2005). Doctoral and postdoctoral education in science and engineering: Europe in the international competition. European Journal of Education, 40(4), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2005.00234.x
   Google Scholar
• Negyesi, J. (2010). Accreditation of doctoral schools in hungary. In A. Bitusikova, J. Bohrer, I. Boroši´c, N. Costes, K. Edinsel, K. Holländer, G. Jacobsson, I. F. Jakopovi´c, M.-L. Kearney, F. Mulder, J. Négyesi, & M. Pietzonka (Eds.), Quality assurance in postgraduate education (pp. 50–63). European Association for Quality Assurance.
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M. (2020). Doctoral education worldwide: Three decades of change. In M. Yudkevich, P. Altbach, & H. de Wit (Eds.), Trends and issues in doctoral education: A global perspective (pp. 33–52). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R., & Tan, K. (2011). From PhD to initial employment: The doctorate in a knowledge economy. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niven, P., & Grant, C. (2012). PhDs by publications: An easy way out? Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.640086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nybom, T. (2003). The humboldt legacy: Reflections on the past, present and future of the European University. Higher Education Policy, 16(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300013
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019) Education at a Glance. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2019_f8d7880d-en
   Google Scholar
• Offerman, M. (2011). Profile of the non-traditional doctoral degree student. New Directions in Adult and Continuing Education, 2011(129), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.397
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., Ravelli, L., & Nicholson, S. (2011). Doctoral writing is the visual and performing arts: Two ends of a continuum. Studies in Higher Education, 37(8), 989–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.562285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2007). Redefining the doctorate. Higher Education Academy. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/435/1/RedefiningTheDoctorate.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pederson, H. (2014). New doctoral graduates in the knowledge economy: Trends and key issues. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 36(6), 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.957891
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, E. (2012). Re-signifying subjectivity? A narrative exploration of ‘non-traditional’ doctoral students’ lived experience of subject formation through two Australian cases. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 823–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.745337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietzonka, M. (2010). Quality assurance of doctoral education in Germany –experiences, standards and challenges. In A. Bitusikova, J. Bohere, I. Borosic, N. Costes, K. Edinsel, K. Hollander, G. Jacabsson, I. F. Jakopovic, M. L. Kearney, F. Muder, J. Negyesi, & M. Pietzonka (Eds.), Quality assurance in postgraduate education (pp. 46–49). https://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/ENQA-workshop-report-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Powell, S., & Green, H. (2007). The doctorate world wide. Society for Research Into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarrico, C. (2022). The expansion of doctoral education and the changing nature and purpose of the doctorate. Higher Education, 84(6), 1299–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00946-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sense, A. (2016). Work-based research degrees: Systematic cultivation through a University-industry network space. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakni, I., Inouye, K., & McAlpine, L. (2021). PhD holders entering non-academic workplaces: Organisational culture shock. Studies in Higher Education, 47(6), 1271–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1876650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J. C., Kehm, B., & Jones, G. (2018). The increasing importance, growth and evolution of doctoral education. In J. C. Shin, B. Kehm, & G. Jones (Eds.), Doctoral education for the knowledge society (pp. 1–12). E-book, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Siggaard Jensen, H. (2007). Doctoral education in Denmark. In S. Powell & H. Green (Eds.), The doctorate worldwide (pp. 19–28). Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. (1983). How the PhD came to Britain. Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. (2009). The development of the PhD degree in Britain, 1917-1959, and since. The Edmund Mellon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smolentseva, A., Huisman, J., Froumin, I., Huisman, J., Smolentseva, A., & Froumin, I. (2018). 25 years of transformations of higher education systems in post-Soviet countries. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.palgrave.com/gb/book/9783319529790, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52980-6
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2008). Quality and standards: The challenge of the professional doctorate. Higher Education in Europe, 33(1), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720802228191
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2012). Changes in doctoral education: Implications for supervisors in developing early career researchers. International Journal of Researcher Development, 3(2), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511311316973
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2014). Towards a framework for the professional development of doctoral supervisors. SDF Digest: A Practitioner Journal for HE Staff Development, 2, 74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2021). Towards describing the doctoral education landscape. UK Council for Graduate Education. http://www.ukcge.ac.uk/article/towards-global-doctoral-landscape-475.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Kiley, M., & Humphrey, R. (2018). A handbook for doctoral supervisors. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315559650
   Google Scholar
• Thornley, C. (2017). Not by degrees: Improving students’ mental health in the UK’s universities. Institute for Public Policy Research. https://www.ippr.org/publications/not-by-degrees
   Google Scholar
• Thule, T. (2009). Doctoral students on the university–industry interface: A review of the literature. Higher Education, 58(5), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9214-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafford, V., & Lesham, S. (2008). Stepping stones to achieving your doctorate. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulhoi, J. (2005). Postgraduate education in Europe: An intersection of conflicting paradigms and goals. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(4), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540510599662
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2019). Higher Education Statistics. http://uis.unesco.org/en/topic/higher-education
   Google Scholar
• Watson, P. (2010). The German genius. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, J. (2010). Team supervision of the doctorate: Managing roles, relationships and contradictions. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), 335–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003740908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfield, G. (1987). The social science PhD: The ESRC enquiry into submission rates. Economic and Social Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, F. (2003). Transforming quality in research supervision: A knowledge-management approach. Quality in Higher Education, 9(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320308149
   Google Scholar
• Zusman, A. (2013, July 6). What’s driving the new professional doctorates? University World News: Issue 279, http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20130704133923315&
   Google Scholar