Ethical communication and intercultural responsibility: a philosophical perspective

References

• Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment. London and New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London and New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Atwell, J. E. (1986). Ends and principles in Kant's moral thought. Dordrecht, Boston, and Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, G. A., & Lee, M. (2002). Issues in intercultural communication. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (pp. 275–290). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Berardo, K., & Deardorff, D. K. (2012). Building cultural competence: Innovative activities and models. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchot, M. (1993). The infinite conversation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (1991). How much culture is there in intercultural communication? In J. Blommaert & J. Verschueren (Eds.), The pragmatics of intercultural communication (pp. 13–33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (1998). Different approaches to intercultural communication: A critical survey. Plenary Lecture, University of Bremen. 27-28 February. Retrieved December 13, 2013 from http://www.cie.ugent.be/CIE/blommaert1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, M., & Risager, K. (1999). Language teachers, politics and cultures. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, M., & Zarate, G. (1997a). Sociocultural competence in language learning and teaching. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, M., & Zarate, G. (1997b). The socio-cultural and intercultural dimension of language learning and teaching. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, H. (2010). A critical reflection on an intercultural communication workshop: Mexicans and Taiwanese working on the US-Mexico border. In T. K. Nakayama & R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication (pp. 549–564). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment, council of Europe, modern languages division. Strasbourg and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, M. L. (2010). Coculturation: Toward a critical theoretical framework of cultural adjustment. In T. K. Nakayama & R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication (pp. 270–285). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10, 241–266. doi:10.1177/1028315306287002
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, D. K. (Ed.). (2009). The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1992). The other heading: Reflections on today's Europe. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (2000). Of hospitality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (2001). On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, F. (2010). Assessing intercultural competence in language learning and teaching: A critical review of current efforts in higher education. In F. Dervin & E. Suomela-Salmi (Eds.), New approaches to assessing language and (inter-)cultural competences in higher education (pp. 157–174). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, F. (2011). A plea for change in research on intercultural discourses: A ‘liquid’ approach to the study of the acculturation of Chinese students. Journal of multicultural discourses, 6, 37–52. doi:10.1080/17447143.2010.532218
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, R. (1993). Meditations on first philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• DeTurk, S. (2010). “Quit whining and tell me about your experiences!”: (In)tolerance, pragmatism, and muting in intergroup dialogue. In T. K. Nakayama & R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication (pp. 565–584). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Furrow, D. (2005). Ethics: Key concepts in philosophy. London and New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W. B. (Ed.). (2003). Cross-cultural and intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guilherme, M. (2002). Critical citizens for an intercultural world. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Guilherme, M. (2010). Mobility, diversity and intercultural dialogue in the cosmopolitan age. In M. Guilherme, E. Glaser, & M. del Carmen Méndez Garcia (Eds.), The intercultural dynamics of multicultural working (pp. 1–17). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Guilherme, M., Keating, C., & Hoppe, D. (2010). Intercultural responsibility: Power and ethics in intercultural dialogue and interaction. In M. Guilherme, E. Glaser, & M. del Carmen Méndez Garcia (Eds.), The intercultural dynamics of multicultural working (pp. 77–94). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, W. (1995). Managing cultures: Making strategic relationships work. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural relations, 27, 421–443. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00032-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardcastle, J. (1999). Von Humboldt's children: English and the formation of a European educational ideal. Changing English, 6(1), 31–45. doi:10.1080/1358684990060104
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences, comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organisations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2004). Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. J., Pedersen, P. B., & Hofstede, G. (2002). Exploring culture. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, A. (2011). Intercultural communication and ideology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1995). The other of justice: Habermas and the ethical challenge of post-modernism. In S. K. White (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Habermas (pp. 289–323). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hüllen, W. (2006). Foreign language teaching – A modern building on historical foundations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 2–15. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00103.x
   Google Scholar
• Jack, G. (2009). A critical perspective on teaching intercultural competence in a management department. In A. Feng, M. Byram, & M. Fleming (Eds.), Becoming interculturally competent through education and training (pp. 95–114). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B. (2001). Dialogical rationality and the critique of absolute autonomy. In P. U. Hohendahl & J. Fisher (Eds.), Critical theory, current state and future prospects (pp. 139–153). New York, NY and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1979). Lectures on ethics. Whitstable, Kent: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Kim Yun, Y. (2008). Intercultural personhood: Globalisation and a way of being. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 337–348. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1985). Ethics and infinity. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1996). Proper names. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1998). Otherwise than being. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (2006). Entre Nous. London and New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Louhiala-Salminen, L., Charles, M., & Kankaanranta, A. (2005). English as a lingua franca in nordic corporate mergers: Two case companies. English for specific purposes, 24, 401–421. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. (1988). The different. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. N., & O'Regan, J. (2012). The ethics of intercultural communication. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45, 1005–1017. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00833.x
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2010). Intercultural communication and dialectics revisited. In T. K. Nakayama & R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication (pp. 59–83). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Monceri, F. (2003). The transculturing self: A philosophical approach. Language and Intercultural Communication, 3, 108–114. doi:10.1080/14708470308668094
   Google Scholar
• Monceri, F. (2009). The transculturing self II: Constructing identity through identification. Language and Intercultural Communication, 9(1), 43–53. doi:10.1080/14708470802444282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, D. G. (2010). Critical reflections on culture and critical intercultural communication. In T. K. Nakayama & R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication (pp. 34–52). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlenko, A. (2003). ‘Language of the enemy’: Foreign language education and national identity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6, 313–331. doi:10.1080/13670050308667789
   Google Scholar
• Peperzak, A. (1989). From intentionality to responsibility: On Levinas's philosophy of language. In A. B. Dallery & C. E. Scott (Eds.), The question of the other (pp. 3–23). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, A. (2007). Learning the arts of linguistic survival. Languaging, tourism, life. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, A. (2010). Training and intercultural education: The danger in good citizenship. In M. Guilherme, E. Glaser & M. del Carmen Méndez Garcia (Eds.), The intercultural dynamics of multicultural working (pp. 59–77). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, A. (2013). Intercultural ethics: Questions of methods in language and intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(1), 10–26. doi:10.1080/14708477.2012.748787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipps, A., & Gonzalez, M. (2004). Modern languages: Learning and teaching in an intercultural field. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Piller, I. (2011). Intercultural communication: A critical introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popke, E. J. (2003). Poststructuralist ethics: Subjectivity, responsibility and the space of community. In Progress in human geography, 27, 298–316. doi:10.1191/0309132503ph429oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poster, M. (1989). Critical theory and Post-structuralism in search of a context. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risager, K. (2006). Language and culture: Global flows and local complexity. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Risager, K. (2008). Towards a transnational paradigm in language and culture pedagogy. AAAL 2008 Annual Conference, Washington, DC, USA. Retrieved January 3, 2013, from http://www.academia.edu/200448/Towards_a_transnational_paradigm_in_language_and_culture_pedagogy
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, J. (Ed.). (2001). Is it righteous to be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A., & Starosta, W. J. (2001). Hans-Georg Gadamer, language, and intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 1(1), 6–20. doi:10.1080/14708470108668060
   Google Scholar
• Schneewind, J. B. (1998). The invention of autonomy: A history of modern moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, S., & Scollon, S. W. (1995). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. R. (1997). The limits of communication: Lyotard and Levinas on otherness. In M. Huspek & G. P. Radford (Eds.), Communication and the voice of the other (pp. 329–351). New York, NY: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer-Oatey, H., & Stadler, S. (2009). The global people competency framework: Competencies for effective intercultural interaction. Warwick occasional papers in applied linguistics, 3. Retrieved November 8, 2012, from http://www.globalpeople.org.uk/, http://warwick.ac.uk/al/
   Google Scholar
• Spitzberg, B. H., & Changnon, G. (2009). Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 2–53). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• von Humboldt, W. F. (1988). On language: The diversity of human language-structure and its influence on the mental development of mankind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, R. L. (2003). Intercultural communication competence. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Cross-cultural and intercultural communication (pp. 191–208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar