Cultural identities in international, interorganisational meetings: a corpus-informed discourse analysis of indexical we

References

• Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 1–15). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aston, G. (1993). Notes on the interlanguage of comity. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 224–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Bargiela-Chiappini, F., & Harris, S. (1997). Managing language: The discourse of corporate meetings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7, 585–614. doi:10.1177/1461445605054407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, J., & Van De Mieroop, D. (2010). ‘Doing’ ethos—A discursive approach to the strategic deployment and negotiation of identities in meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2449–2461. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, M. J., & Thomas, M. (1988). Cultural identity: An interpretive perspective. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 99–120). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Fina, A. (1995). Promotional choice, identity and solidarity in political discourse. Text, 15(3), 379–410.
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, F. (2011). Cultural identity, representation and othering. In J. Jackson (Ed.), Routledge handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 181–194). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analysing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1993) Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4, 133–168. doi:10.1177/0957926593004002002
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2000). New labour, new language? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2000). Who needs identity? In P. du Gay, J. Evans, & P. Redman (Eds.), Identity: A reader (pp. 15–30). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Handford, M. (2010). The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handford, M. (2013). Context in spoken professional discourse: Language and practice in an international business meeting. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Discourse in context (pp. 113–132). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Handford, M., & Matous, P. (2011). Lexicogrammar in the international construction industry: A corpus-based case study of Japanese – Hong-Kongese on-site interactions in English. English for Specific Purposes, 30(2), 87–100. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2010.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, C. (2007). Introduction: A closer look at cultural difference: ‘Interculturality’ in talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics, 17(1), 18.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and organisations. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1998). Attitudes, values and organizational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organization Studies, 19, 477–493. doi:10.1177/017084069801900305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, A. (1999). Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, 20, 237–264. doi:10.1093/applin/20.2.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, A. (2011). Intercultural communication and ideology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, D. (2007). Reconceptualising cultural identity and its role in intercultural business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 199–235. doi:10.1177/0021943607301346
   Google Scholar
• Koester, A. J. (2004). Relational sequences in workplace genres. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1405–1428. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laviosa, S. (2012). Corpora and translation studies. In K. Hyland, M. H. Chau, & M. Handford (Eds.), Corpus applications in applied linguistics: Current approaches and future directions (pp. 65–81). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. (1999). Cross cultural communication: A visual approach. Warnford: Transcreen.
   Google Scholar
• Mautner, G. (2009). Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 122–143). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith – A failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulderrig, J. (2012). The hegemony of inclusion: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of deixis in education policy. Discourse and Society, 23, 701–728. doi:10.1177/0957926512455377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keeffe, A. (2006). Investigating media discourse. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W. (2010). Developing elementary teachers’ understandings of hedges and personal pronouns in inquiry-based science classroom discourse. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 103–126. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9157-4
   Google Scholar
• Poncini, G. (2004). Discursive strategies in multicultural business meetings. Bern: Peter Lang, Linguistic Insights Series.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. (2011). Wordsmith tools version 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B. (2004). Identity in modern society: A social psychological perspective. Blackwell: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 639–656. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinzi, C. (2011). Corpus linguistics and intercultural communicative approach: A synergy. Cultus, 4, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, N. M. (2000). The dynamic nature of cultural identity throughout cultural transitions: Why home is not so sweet. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 355–373. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijhuis, W., & Fellows, R. (2012) Culture in international construction. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C. Caldas Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices (32–70). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (1990). Politically speaking: The pragmatic analysis of political language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (1999). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wortham, S. E. F. (1996). Mapping participant deictics: A technique for discovering participants’ footing. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 331–348. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(94)00100-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, T., & Sercombe, P. (2010). Communication, discourses and interculturality. Language and Intercultural Communication, 10, 181–188. doi:10.1080/14708470903348523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Hua (2013). Exploring intercultural communication: Language in action. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zupnik, Y.-J. (1994). A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 339–383. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(94)90010-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar