Interpretation, translation and intercultural communication in refugee status determination procedures in the UK and France

References

• Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in court settings. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berk-Seligson, S. (2002). The bilingual courtroom: Court interpreters in the judicial process. Chicago, IL: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cimade. (2010). Voyage au centre de l'asile: Enquête sur la procédure de détermination d'asile [Voyage to the centre of asylum: An investigation into the asylum determination procedure]. Paris. Retrieved from http://www.cimade.org/publications/39
   Google Scholar
• Colin, J., & Morris, R. (1996). Interpreters and the legal process. Winchester: Waterside Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commission des recours des réfugiés. (2007). L'interprétariat à la Commission des recours des réfugiés: Les règles de déontologie et l'organisation [Interpreting at the Refugee Appeal Board: Code of conduct and the organisation]. Paris: CRR.
   Google Scholar
• Conseil d'État. (2012). Le Conseil d'État et la justice administrative en 2011 [The Council of State and Administrative Justice in 2011]. Retrieved from http://www.conseil-etat.fr/bilan-activite2011/
   Google Scholar
• Cornu, G. (2007). Vocabulaire juridique [Legal vocabulary] (8th ed.). Paris: Quadrige/PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, R., & Good, A. (2013). Do the facts speak for themselves? Country of origin information in French and British refugee status determination procedures. International Journal of Refugee Law, 25, 291–322. doi:10.1093/ijrl/eet015
   Google Scholar
• Good, A. (2007). Anthropology and expertise in the asylum courts. London: Routledge/Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Good, A. (2011a). Tales of suffering: Asylum narratives in the refugee status determination process. West Coast Line, 68, 80–89.
   Google Scholar
• Good, A. (2011b). Witness statements and credibility assessments in the British asylum courts. In L. Holden (Ed.), Cultural expertise and litigation: Patterns, conflicts, narratives (pp. 94–122). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., & Pickup, A. (2012). Best practice guide to asylum and human rights appeals. Retrieved from http://www.ein.org.uk/bpg/contents.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Justice Committee. (2013). Interpreting and translation services and the Applied Language Solutions contract (HC 645). London: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kalin, W. (1986). Troubled communication: Cross-cultural misunderstandings in the asylum-hearing. International Migration Review, 20, 230–241. doi:10.2307/2546033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaygun v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, 17213, 29 March 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R. (1995). The moral dilemmas of court interpreting. The Translator, 1(1), 25–46. doi:10.1080/13556509.1995.10798948
   Google Scholar
• Office français de protection des réfugiés et apatrides. (2007). Rapport d'activité 2006 [Annual Report 2006]. Retrieved from http://www.ofpra.gouv.fr/documents/rapport_Ofpra_2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Office français de protection des réfugiés et apatrides. (2009). Rapport d'activité 2008 [Annual Report 2008]. Retrieved from http://www.ofpra.gouv.fr/documents/Rapport_Ofpra_2008_complet_BD.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Office français de protection des réfugiés et apatrides. (2011). Au coeur de l'Ofpra: Demandeurs d'asile et réfugiés en France [At the heart of the OFPRA: Asylum seekers and refugees in France]. Paris: La documentation française.
   Google Scholar
• Office français de protection des réfugiés et apatrides. (2012). Rapport d'activité 2011 [Annual Report 2011]. Retrieved from http://www.ofpra.gouv.fr/documents/OfpraRA2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pöllabauer, S. (2004). Interpreting in asylum hearings: Issues of role, responsibility and power. Interpreting, 6, 143–180. doi:10.1075/intp.6.2.03pol
   Google Scholar
• Rycroft, R. (2005). Communicative barriers in the asylum account. In P. Shah (Ed.), The challenge of asylum to legal systems (pp. 223–244). London: Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (1992). Handbook on procedures and criteria for determining refugee status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the status of refugees. HCR/IP/4/Eng/REV.1 Reedited. Geneva: UNHCR.
   Google Scholar
• Venuti, L. (2008). The translator's invisibility: A history of translation (2nd ed.). London & New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wadensjö, C. (1998). Interpreting as interaction. London & New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar