1,953
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Issues of language and competence in intercultural business contexts

References

  • Arasaratnam, L. A. (2007). Research in intercultural communication competence: Past perspectives and future directions. Journal of International Communication, 13(2), 66–73. doi:10.1080/13216597.2007.9674715
  • Arasaratnam, L. A. (2009). The development of a new instrument of intercultural communication competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 20. Retrieved from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/
  • Arasaratnam, L. A., & Doerfel, M. L. (2005). Intercultural communication competence: Identifying key components from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 137–163. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2004.04.001
  • Asante, M. K., Miike, Y., & Yin, J. (2014). The global intercultural communication reader. New York: Routledge.
  • Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bargiela, F. (2005). Language at work: The first ten years. ESP Across Cultures, 1, 22–34.
  • Baumann, G. (1996). Contesting culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Block, D. (2013). The structure and agency dilemma in identity and intercultural communication research. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(2), 126–147. doi:10.1080/14708477.2013.770863
  • Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clyne, M. G. (1994). Intercultural communication at work: Cultural values in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Crosling, G., & Ward, I. (2002). Oral communication: The workplace needs and uses of business graduate employees. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 41–57. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00031-4
  • Dahl, S. (2003). An overview of intercultural research, society for intercultural training and research UK I/10 (2/2003). Retrieved from www.unice.fr/.../_dahal%20-%20overview-of-intercultural-research.pdf
  • Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10, 241–266. doi:10.1177/1028315306287002
  • Dervin, F., & Kuoppala K. (in press). Developing a portfolio of intercultural competences in teacher education: The case of a Finnish international programme. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research.
  • Dervin, F., Paatela-Nieminen, M., Kuoppala, K., & Riitaoja, A.-L. (2012). Multicultural education in Finland – Renewed intercultural competences to the rescue? International Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(3), 1–13.
  • European Institute for Comparative Cultural Research (ERICarts). (2008). What is intercultural dialogue? Retrieved from http://www.interculturaldialogue.eu/web/intercultural-dialogue.php
  • Fantini, A. E. (2010). Language: An essential component of intercultural communicative competence. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 263–278). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Firth, A. (1990) ‘Lingua franca’ negotiations: Towards an interactional approach. World Englishes, 9(3), 269–280.
  • Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On Conversation Analysis and ‘Lingua Franca’ English. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 237–259.
  • Goodenough, W. H. (1994). Toward a working theory of culture. In R. Borofsky (Ed.), Assessing cultural anthropology (pp. 262–275). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
  • Hall, E.T. (1959). The silent language. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421–443. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00032-4
  • Heller, M. (2003). Globalization, the new economy and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7, 473–492. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238.x
  • Heller, M. (2005, July). Paradoxes of language in the globalised new economy. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Communication Cardiff, Wales.
  • Heller. (2010). Language as resource in the globalized new economy. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Handbook of language and globalisation (pp. 349–365). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Hillage, J., & Pollard, E. (1998). Employability: Developing a framework for policy analysis (Research Report No. 85). Nottingham: Department for Education and Employment (DfEE).
  • Hofstede, G. (1980/2001). Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values/comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organisations across nations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. (1991/2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind/intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. London: McGraw-Hill.
  • Holliday, A. (1999). Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 237–264.
  • Holmes, J. (2006). Gendered talk at work: Constructing gender identity through workplace discourse. New York and Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Holmes, J., and Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Pearson.
  • Hymes, D. (1968). The ethnography of speaking. In J. A. Fishman (Ed.), Readings in the sociology of language (pp. 99–133). The Hague: Mouton.
  • Hymes, D. (1974a). On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Hymes, D. (1974b). Ways of speaking. In R. Baumann and J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 433–451). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jenks, C., Bhatia, A., & Lou, J. (2013). Special issue: The discourse of culture and identity in national and transnational contexts. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(2), 121–125. doi:10.1080/14708477.2013.770862
  • Jones, L., & Alexander, R. (1996). New international business English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kaur, S., & Clarke, C. (2009). Analysing the English language needs of human resource staff in multinational companies. English for Specific Purposes, 8(3). Retrieved from http://www.esp-world.info.
  • Kaur, M., & Chuah S. C. (2012). Manufacturing industry employers' perception of graduates' English language skills proficiency. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(4), 114–124.
  • Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kramsch, C. (2001). Intercultural communication. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 201–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Papers. Peabody Museum of Archaeology & Ethnology, Harvard University. Cambridge, MA: Mass. Vol 47(1). Retrieved from http://www.archive.org/details/papersofpeabodymvol47no1peab
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  • Kupka, B. (2008). Creation of an instrument to assess intercultural communication competence for strategic international human resource management ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Otago, Otago.
  • Ladegaard, H. J. (2011). ‘Doing power’ at work: Responding to male and female management styles in a global business corporation. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 4–19. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.006
  • Lapointe, A. E. (1994). Measuring global competence. In R. D. Lambert (Ed.), Educational exchange and global competence (pp. 275–276). New York, NY: Council on International Educational Exchange.
  • MacDonald, M. N., & O'Regan, J. P. (2012). A global agenda for intercultural communication research and practice. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 553–567). Oxon: Routledge.
  • MacDonald, M. N., O'Regan, J. P., & Witana, J. (2009). The development of national occupational standards for intercultural working in the UK. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 61, 375–398. doi:10.1080/13636820903363600
  • McCrum, R. (2010). Globish: How English became the world's language. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
  • McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith – A failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–117
  • Miike, Y. (2014). The Asiacentric turn in Asian communication studies: Shifting paradigms and changing perspectives. In M. K. Asante, Y. Miike, & J. Yin (Eds.), The global intercultural communication reader (pp. 111–133). New York: Routledge.
  • Milner, A. (2003). Who created Malaysia's plural society? Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, LXXVI(2), 1–24.
  • Moslehifar, M. A., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2012). English language oral communication needs at the workplace: Feedback from human resource development (HRD) trainees. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 529–536.
  • Muthiah, P. (2002). ‘Welcome to the real world’: A comparative study of the orientation to the evaluation of business correspondence by ESL instructors and business practitioners and its implications for teaching and assessment ( Unpublished PhD thesis). The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
  • Muthiah, P. (2003). English language proficiency at the workplace: Expectations of bank officers in Malaysia. Asian Englishes, 6(2), 64–81.
  • Nair-Venugopal, S. (2000). Language choice and communication in Malaysian business. Bangi: Penerbit UKM/UKM Press.
  • Nair-Venugopal, S. (2001). The sociolinguistics of choice in Malaysian business settings. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 152, 121–153.
  • Nair-Venugopal, S. (2003a). Approximations of social reality as interpretations of culture: Extending a framework of analysis in intercultural communication. Journal of International Communication, 9(2), 13–28.
  • Nair-Venugopal, S. (2003b). Intelligibility in English: Of what relevance to intercultural communication? Language and Intercultural Communication, 3(1), 36–47. doi:10.1080/14708470308668088
  • Nair-Venugopal, S. (2006). An interactional model of Malaysian English. A contextualised response to commodification. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 16(1), 51–75.
  • Nair-Venugopal, S. (2009). Localised perspectives Malaysia. In F. Bargiela (Ed.), Handbook of business discourse (pp. 387–399). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Nair-Venugopal, S. (2012). The gaze of the west and framings of the east. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nair-Venugopal, S. (2013). Linguistic ideology and practice: Language, literacy and communication in a localized workplace context in relation to the globalized. Linguistics and Education, 24, 454–465. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2013.05.001
  • Newcombe, S. (2012). Global hybrids? ‘Eastern traditions’ of health and wellness in the West. In S. Nair-Venugopal (Ed.), The gaze of the West and framings of the East (pp. 202–217). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • O'Regan, J. P., & MacDonald, M. N. (2007). Consultation report on the development of national occupational standards in intercultural working: Phase I ( Unpublished report). CILT Project to Develop Standards for Intercultural Working, London.
  • Ong, T. L., Leong C. K., & Kaur, P. (2011). Employer expectations of language at the workplace. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 7(2), 82–103. Retrieved from www.melta.org.my
  • Paramasivam, S., & Nair-Venugopal, S. (2012). Indian collectivism revisited: Unpacking the western gaze. In S. Nair-Venugopal (Ed.), The gaze of the west and framings of the east (pp. 156–169). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Plum, E., Achen, B., Dræby, I., & Jensen, I. (2008). Cultural intelligence: The art of leading cultural complexity (management, policy + education). Middlesex: Middlesex University Press.
  • Ratnam, K. J. (1965). Communalism and the political process in Malaya. Singapore: University of Malaya Press.
  • Robertson, R. (1995). ‘Glocalization’. In S. Lash, M. Featherstone, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp 25–44). London: Sage.
  • Sarudin, I., Mohd Noor, Z., Zubairi, A. M., Tunku Ahmad, T. B., & Nordin, M. S. (2013). Needs assessment of workplace English and Malaysian graduates' English language competency. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21, 88–94. doi:10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.sltl.2141
  • Savignon, S. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Shi-Xu. (2009). Asian discourse studies: Foundations and directions. Asian Journal of Communication, 19(4), 384–397.
  • Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum.
  • Spitzberg, B. H., & Changnon, G. (2009). Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 2–51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Stewart, J., & Hamlin, R. G. (1992). Competence-based qualifications: The case for established Methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 16(10): 9–16. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/215396850?accountid=28110
  • Street, B. (1993). Culture is a verb. In D. Graddol, L. Thompson, & M. Byram (Ed.), Culture and language (pp. 23–43). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters / British Association of Applied Linguistics.
  • Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business (2nd ed.). London: Nicholas Brealey.
  • Wahi, W., O’Neill, M., & Chapman, A. (2011). Investigating English language academic literacy for employability of undergraduate students: A case in a Malaysian public university. In S. A. M. Pandian, M. Ismail, & C. H. Toh (Eds.), Teaching and learning in diverse contexts: Issues and approaches (pp. 90–101). Penang: School of Languages, Literacies and Translation, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.