715
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Transnational intergenerationalities: cultural learning in Polish migrant families and its implications for pedagogy

&

References

  • Aarsand, P. A. (2007). Computer and video games in family life: The digital divide as a resource in intergenerational interactions. Childhood, 14, 235–256. doi:10.1177/0907568207078330
  • Ager, A., & Strang, A. (2008). Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21, 166–191. doi:10.1093/jrs/fen016
  • Anthias, F. (2008). Thinking through the lens of translocational positionality: An intersectionality frame for understanding identity and belonging. Translocations, 4(1), 5–20.
  • Anthias, F. (2011). Intersections and translocations: New paradigms for thinking about cultural diversity and social identities. European Educational Research Journal, 10, 204–217. doi:10.2304/eerj.2011.10.2.204
  • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7, 295–310. doi:10.1177/026327690007002017
  • Attias-Donfut, C., & Segalen, M. (2002). The construction of grandparenthood. Current Sociology, 50, 281–294.doi:10.1177/0011392102050002622
  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage.
  • Bushin, N. (2007). Interviewing with children in their homes: Putting ethical principles into practice and developing flexible techniques. Childrens Geographies, 5, 235–251.
  • Castles, S., De Haas, H., & Miller, M. (2013). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (5th ed.). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Chaudhary, N. (2008). Persistent patterns in cultural negotiations of the Self: Using dialogical Self theory to understand self-other dynamics within culture. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 3(1), 9–30.
  • Chuang, S. S., & Moreno, R. (2011). Immigrant children: Change, adaptation, and cultural transformation. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gadsden, V. L., & Simmons, M. (1996). Intergenerational learning: A review of literature. National Centre for Fathers and Families, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
  • Gregory, E. (2001). Sisters and brothers as language and literacy teachers: Synergy between siblings playing and working together. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1, 301–322. doi:10.1177/14687984010013004
  • Grewal, I., & Ritchie, J. (2006). Ethnic and language matching of the researcher and the research group during design, fieldwork and analysis. In J. Y. Nazroo (Ed.), Health and social research in multiethnic societies (pp. 65–82). London: Routledge.
  • Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1992). Beyond “culture”: Space, identity and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 6–23. doi:10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00020
  • Hanks, R. S., & Ponzetti Jr., J. J. (2004). Family studies and intergenerational studies. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2(3–4), 5–22. doi:10.1300/J194v02n03_02
  • Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education (HMIE). (2009). Count us in: Meeting the needs of children and young people newly arrived in Scotland. Livingston, NY: HMIE.
  • Hopkins, P., Olson, E., Pain, R., & Vincett, G. (2010). Mapping intergenerationalities: The formation of youthful religiosities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 314–327.
  • Jenks, C. (2005). Childhood (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kenner, C., Ruby, M., Jessel, J., Gregory, E., & Arju, T. (2007). Intergenerational learning between children and grandparents in East London. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 5, 219–243. doi:10.1177/1476718X07080471
  • Lloyd, J. (2008). The state of intergenerational relations today: A research and discussion paper. London: International Longevity Centre.
  • Lopez-Rodriguez, M. (2010). Migration and a quest for ‘normalcy’. Polish migrant mothers and the capitalization of meritocratic opportunities in the UK. Social Identities, 16, 339–358. doi:10.1080/13504630.2010.482422
  • Lüscher, K., & Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 413–425.
  • Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Stierer, B. (1992). “Scaffolding” learning in the classroom. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the national curriculum project (pp. 186–196). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
  • Moghaddam, F. M. (2003). Interobjectivity and culture. Culture and Psychology, 9, 221–232. doi:10.1177/1354067X030093004
  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
  • Orellana, M. F. (2009). Translating childhoods: Immigrant youth, language and culture. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Parrenas, R. S. (2005). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Phua V. C., & Kaufman, G. (2008). Grandparenting responsibility among elderly Asian Americans. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 6(1), 41–59. doi:10.1300/J194v06n01_04
  • Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkley: University of California Press.
  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sayad, A. (2004). The suffering of the immigrant. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Scottish Government. (2010). Curriculum for excellence. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  • Scottish Government. (2013). Summary statistics for school in Scotland: Number 4. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  • Sime, D. (2008). Ethical and methodological issues in engaging young people living in poverty with participatory research methods. Childrens Geographies, 6(1), 63–78.
  • Sime, D. ( in press). Challenging barriers to participation: Doing research with migrant children and young people. In T. Skelton, L. Holt, & R. Evans (Eds.), Geographies of children and young people, methodological approaches (Vol. 2). New York: Springer.
  • Sime, D., & Fox, R. (2014a). Migrant children, social capital and access to public services: Transitions, negotiations and complex agencies. Children & Society. doi:10.1111/chso.12092
  • Sime, D., & Fox, R. (2014b). Eastern European children's family and peer relationships after migration. Childhood. doi:10.1177/0907568214543199
  • Tarrant, A., (2010). Constructing a social geography of grandparenthood: A new focus for intergenerationality. Area, 42, 190–197. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00920.x
  • Vanderbeck, R. (2007). Intergenerational geographies: Age relations, segregation and reengagements. Geography Compass, 1, 200–221. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00012
  • Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. London: Routledge.
  • Volk, D., & de Acosta, M. (2004). Mediating networks for literacy learning: The role of Puerto Rican siblings. In E. Gregory, S. Long, & D. Volk (Eds.), Many pathways to literacy: Young children learning with siblings, grandparents, peers and communities (pp. 24–39). London: Routledge Falmer.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wetherell, M. (2009). The identity/action relation. In M. Wetherell (Ed.), Theorizing identities and social action. Identity studies in the social sciences (pp. 1–19). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • White, A. (2011). Polish families and migration since EU accession. Bristol, Polity Press.
  • Yoshida, H., Gordon, D., & Henkin, N. (2008). Recognition of contributions of older immigrants and refugees. Philadelphia, PA: Centre of Intergenerational Learning, Temple University.
  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. London: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.