The ‘intercultural field’: interrogating context in intercultural education

References

• Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Rafael, E. (2009). A sociological approach to the study of linguistic landscapes. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 40–55). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, P. (2011). Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field. In P. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp. 7–17). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, P., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2011). Beyond the language classroom. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., Urry, J., & Witchger, K. (Eds.). (2011). Mobile methods. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, M., & Grundy, P. (2003). Introduction: Context and culture in language teaching and learning. In M. Byram & P. Grundy (Eds.), Context and culture in language teaching and learning (pp. 1–17). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary Online. (2014, September). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved September 12, 2014, from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/40207.
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, F. (2011). A plea for change in research on intercultural discourses: A ‘Liquid’ approach to the study of the acculturation of Chinese students. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 6(1), 37–52. doi: 10.1080/17447143.2010.532218
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2000). Globalisation and pedagogy. Space, place and identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forsman, L. (2004). Language, culture and context: Exploring knowledge and attitudes among Finland-Swedish EFL-students with particular focus on extracurricular influence. Vasa: Abo Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, M. C., Gockel, B., Hauschild, T., Kimmich, D., & Mahlke, K. (2008). Räume – Zur Einführung. Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaft, 2, 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive. Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (2010). Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2010). Globalization: Key thinkers. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P., Bunce, G., Evans, J., Gibbs, H., & Hein, J. R. (2008). Exploring space and place with walking interviews. Journal of Research Practice, 4(2), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject. What language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. (2004). “It depends on the students themselves”: Independent language learning at an Indonesian state school. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 17, 229–245. doi: 10.1080/07908310408666695
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. doi: 10.1093/applin/18.2.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (1997). Approaches to observation in classroom research. Observation from an ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 783–787. doi: 10.2307/3587762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Najar, U. (2012). Walking through the intercultural field: An ethnographic study of intercultural language learning as a spatial-embodied practice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Najar, U. (2014). Weaving a method: Mobility, multilocality and the senses as foci of research on intercultural language learning. In J. Byrd-Clarke & F. Dervin (Eds.), Reflexivity in language and intercultural education: Rethinking multilingualism and interculturality (pp. 193–213). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Palfreyman, D. (2006). Social context and resources for language learning. System, 34, 352–370. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2006.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, A. (2007). Learning the arts of linguistic survival: Languaging, tourism, life. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters/Channel View Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, A., & Gonzalez, M. (2004). Modern languages: Learning and teaching in an intercultural field. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S., & Rizvi, F. (2010). Globalization and the study of education: An introduction. In T. S. Popkewitz & F. Rizvi (Eds.), Globalization and the study of education. Yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 7–28). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Risager, K. (2006). Language and culture: Global flows and local complexity. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F. (2007). Teaching global interconnectivity. Paper presented at the 21st century curriculum: Taking bearings conference, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, N. J., Renold, E., Holland, S., & Hillman, A. (2009). Moving stories: Using mobile methods to explore the everyday lives of young people in public care. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 605–623. doi: 10.1177/1468794109343629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., & Van Niekerk, L. (2007). Narrative inquiry: Theory and practice. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(3), 459–472. doi: 10.1080/03098260601071324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., & Scollon, B. K. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sundquist, P. (2009). Extramural English matters – Out-of-school English and its impact on Swedish ninth graders’ oral proficiency and vocabulary. Karlstad: Karlstad University Studies. Online. Retrieved September 12, 2014, from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:275141.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y.-F. (2001). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tudor, I. (2003). Learning to live with complexity: Towards an ecological perspective on language learning. System, 31, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00070-2
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. doi: 10.1080/01419870701599465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Y. (2005). ‘Asian Adolescents’ out-of-school encounters with English and Korean literacy. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 15, 57–77. doi: 10.1075/japc.15.1.06yi
   Google Scholar