References
- Arasaratnam, L. A. (2007). Research in intercultural communication competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 13(2), 66–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2007.9674715
- Baker, W. (2021). From intercultural to transcultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2021.2001477
- Bateson, G. (2015). Form, substance and difference (1970). ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 72(1), 90–104.
- Bhambra, G. (2007). Rethinking modernity: Postcolonialism and the sociological imagination. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Blaut, J. M. (1993). The colonizer’s model of the world: Geographical diffusionism and eurocentric history. The Guilford Press.
- Castelló, M., McAlpine, L., Sala-Bubaré, A., Inouye, K., & Skakni, I. (2021). What perspectives underlie ‘researcher identity’? A review of two decades of empirical studies. Higher Education, 81(3), 567–590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00557-8
- Cunningham, A., & Williams, P. (1993). De-centring the ‘big picture’: The origins of modern science and the modern origins of science. The British Journal for the History of Science, 26(4), 407–432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400031447
- Dear, P. (2005). What is the history of science the history of? Early modern roots of the ideology of modern science. Isis, 96(3), 390–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/447747
- Deen, P. (2019). Dewey, Habermas, and the unfinished project of modernity in unmodern philosophy and modern philosophy. In S. Fesmire (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Dewey (pp. 537–550). Oxford University Press.
- Dervin, F., & Simpson, A. (2021). Interculturality and the political within education. Routledge.
- Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1–29.
- Eisenstadt, S. N. (2001). The civilizational dimension of modernity: Modernity as a distinct civilization. International Sociology, 16(3), 320–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/026858001016003005
- Elshakry, M. (2010). When science became Western: Historiographical reflections. Isis, 101(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/652691
- Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against method (3rd ed.). Verso.
- Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books.
- Grosfoguel, R., Hernández, R., & Velásquez, E. R. (Eds.) (2016). Decolonizing the Westernized University: Interventions in philosophy of education from within and without. Lexington Books.
- Gudykunst, W. B. (1985). Intercultural communication: Current status and proposed directions. Journal of East and West Studies: Perspectives on East Asian Economies and Industries, 14(1), 99–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/12265088508422731
- Habermas, J. (1981). Modernity versus postmodernity. New German Critique, (22), Special Issue on Modernism, 3–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/487859
- Halualani, R. T., Mendoza, S. L., & Drzewiecka, A. (2009). ‘Critical’ junctures in intercultural communication studies: A review. The Review of Communication, 9(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15358590802169504
- Holliday, A. (2011). Intercultural communication and ideology. Sage.
- Holliday, A., & MacDonald, M. N. (2020). Researching interculturality: Intersubjectivity and the problem with postpositivism. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 621–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz006
- Holmes, P., & MacDonald, M. N. (2020). The ‘good’ interculturalist yesterday, today and tomorrow: Everyday life-theory-research-policy-practice. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1692513
- Huang, Z. M. (2020). Learning from the ‘right’ ground of mindfulness: Insights for the ‘good’ interculturalist. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2019.1672711
- Kelly, M., & Tomic, A. (2001). Editorial. Language and Intercultural Communication, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470108668059
- Krieken, R. V. (1990). The organization of the soul: Elias and Foucault on discipline and the self. European Journal of Sociology/ Archives Européennes de Sociologie/ Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie, 31(2), Regional autonomy: marginalization, integration & democracy, 353–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S000397560000610X
- Ladegaard, H. J., & Phipps, A. (2020). Intercultural research and social activism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1729786
- Maldonado-Torres, N. (2011). Enrique Dussel’s liberation thought in the decolonial turn. Transmodernity: Journal of the Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5070/T411000003
- Mignolo, W. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.
- Miike, Y. (2017). Non-Western theories of communication: Indigeneous ideas and insights. In L. Chen (Ed.), Intercultural communication (pp. 67–97). De Gruyter.
- Monceri, F. (2006). Interculturalità e comunicazione. Una prospettiva filosofica [Interculturality and Communication: A Philosophical Perspective]. Edizioni Lavoro.
- Monceri, F. (2019). Beyond universality: Rethinking transculturality and the transcultural self. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 14(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2019.1604715
- Moon, D. G. (1996). Concepts of ‘culture’: Implications for intercultural communication research. Communication Quarterly, 44(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379609370001
- Ono, K. A. (2010). Reflections on ‘Problematizing ‘Nation’ in intercultural communication research’. In T. K. Nakayama, & R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication studies (pp. 84–97). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Phipps, A., & Ladegaard, H. J. (2020). Notes towards a socially engaged LAIC. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(2), 218–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1722688
- Piller, I. (2017). Intercultural communication: A critical introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
- Prosser, M. H. (1973). Major books on intercultural communication. Intercultural Communications Network.
- Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, eurocentrism and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from the South, 1(3), 533–580.
- R’boul, H. (2020). Postcolonial interventions in intercultural communication knowledge: Meta-intercultural ontologies, decolonial knowledges and epistemological polylogue. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2020.1829676
- Rogers, E. M., Hart, W. B., Miike, Y., & Edward, T. (2002). Hall and the history of intercultural communication: The United States and Japan. Keio Communication Review, (24), 3–26.
- Santos, B. d. S. (2007). General introduction: Reinventing social emancipation: Toward New Manifestos. In B. de Sousa Santos (Ed.), Democratizing democracy: Beyond the liberal democratic canon (pp. xvii–xxxiii). Verso.
- Santos, B. d. S. (2018). The End of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the south. Duke University Press.
- Scambler, G. (1996). The ‘Project of Modernity’ and the parameters for a critical sociology: An argument with illustrations from medical sociology. Sociology, 30(3), 567–581. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038596030003009
- Starosta, W. J., & Chen, G.-M. (2010). Expanding the circumference of intercultural communication. In T. K. Nakayama, & R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication studies (pp. 130–146). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Starosta, W. J., & Chen, G. M. (2001, November). A Fifth Moment in Intercultural Communication? A Dialogue [Paper presentation]. Meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
- Stichweh, R. (1992). The sociology of scientific disciplines: On the genesis and stability of the disciplinary structure of modern science. Science in Context, 5(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700001071
- Stichweh, R. (2001). History of scientific disciplines. In N. J. Smelser, & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 13727–13731). Pergamon.
- Zhu, H. (2020). Making a stance: Social action for language and intercultural communication research. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(2), 206–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1730393