Civic Engagement in the Performance Evaluation of the Public Sector in China: Building horizontal accountability to enhance vertical accountability

REFERENCES

• Aucoin, P. and Heintzman, R. (2000) The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public Management Reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66:1 pp45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2001) Rethinking Democratic Accountability, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2005) ‘Public Accountability’ in E. Ferlie, L. Lynne and C. Pollitt (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, 182–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. (2004) Managed Participation in China. Political Science Quarterly, 119:3 pp425–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, H. S. and Gao, J. (2009) Putting the Cart Before the Horse: Accountability or Performance. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68 ppS51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, B. K. P. (2009) Government and Policy-Making in China: Implication of Governing Capacity, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duan, H. (2009) A Study of the Third-Party Evaluation of Government Performance in China (in Chinese). Journal of Henan Normal University, 36:6 pp47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Edin, M. (2003) State Capacity and Local Agent Control in China: CCP Cadre Management from a Township Perspective. China Quarterly, 173 pp35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, K. W. (2006) Improving Municipal Governance in China: Yantai’s Pathbreaking Experiment in Administrative Reform. Modern China, 32:2 pp221–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2004) ‘Empowerment and Institutional Change: Mapping “Virtuous Circles” of State-Society Interaction’ in R. Alsop (ed) Power, Rights, and Poverty: Concept and Connections, 3–14. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, J. (2009) Governing by Goals and Numbers: A Case Study in the Use of Performance Measurement to Build State Capacity in China. Public Administration and Development, 29:1 pp21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, A. M. and Jenkins, R. (2001) Hybrid Forms of Accountability: Citizen Engagement in Institutions of Public-Sector Oversight in India. Public Management Review, 3:3 pp363–83.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, H. (1981) Organizing China: The Problem of Bureaucracy, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• He, B. (2006a) ‘Western Theories of Deliberative Democracy and the Chinese Practice of Complex Deliberative Governance’ in E. J. Leib and B. He (eds) The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China, 133–48. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• –––– (2006b) ‘Participatory and Deliberative Institutions in China’ in E. J. Leib and B. He (eds) The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China, 175–96. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• –––– (2011) Civic Engagement Through Participatory Budgeting in China: Three Different Logics at Work. Public Administration and Development, 2:31 pp122–33.
   Google Scholar
• He, B. and Thøgersen, S. (2010) Giving the People a Voice? Experiments with Consultative Authoritarian Institutions in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 19:66 pp675–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. and Coates, P. (2004) Citizen-Initiated Performance Assessment: The Initial Iowa Experience. Public Performance & Management Review, 27:3 pp29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, C. and Wu, J. (2009) ‘Appraisal of the Style of Work: Analysis of the Procedure, Key Elements and Factors Affecting the Improvement of Achievements and Efficiency’ (in Chinese). Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences), 37:1 pp85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. I. and Kobayashi, M. M. (2000) Citizen Surveys: How to Do Them, How to Use Them, What They Mean (2nd edn), Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. (1999) ‘Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies’ in A. Schedler, L. Diamond and M. F. Plattner (eds) The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, 29–52. London: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, S. (1992) Accountability in Public Services: Exit, Voice and Control. World Development, 20:7 pp1047–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, E. J. (2011) ‘From Mass Campaigns to Managed Campaigns: “Constructing a New Socialist Countryside”’ in S. Heilmann and E. J. Perry (eds) Mao’s Invisible Hand: The Political Foundations of Adaptive Governance in China, 30–61. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. and Dubnick, M. J. (1998) ‘Accountability’ in J. M. Shafritz (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration, 6–11. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T. (2008) Accountability in the Shadow of Hierarchy: The Horizontal Accountability of Agencies. Public Organization Review, 2:8 pp175–94.
   Google Scholar
• –––– (2011) Does Horizontal Accountability Work? Evaluating Potential Remedies for the Accountability Deficit of Agencies. Administration and Society, 43:4 pp387–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. G. (1998) ‘The Changing Nature of Accountability’ in B. G. Peters and D. J. Savoie (eds) Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms, 348–93. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. R. (1977) Populism and the Legacy of Mao Tse-Tung. Asian Survey, 17:11 pp1003–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhr, J. (1993) Redesigning Accountability: From Muddles to Maps. The Australian Quarterly, 65:2 pp1–16.
   Google Scholar
• van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J. (2010) Performance Management in the Public Sector, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, S. H. (2004) ‘The Cadre Evaluation System at the Grass Roots: The Paradox of Party Rule’ in B. J. Naughton and D. Yang (eds) Holding China Together: Diversity and National Integration in the Post-Deng Era, 101–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, M. K. (1980) ‘Bureaucracy and Antibureaucracy in the People’s Republic of China’ in G. M. Britan and R. Cohen (eds) Hierarchy and Society: Anthropological Perspectives on Bureaucracy, 123–41. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
   Google Scholar
• Winckler, E. A. (1984) Institutionalization and Participation on Taiwan: From Hard to Soft Authoritarianism. The China Quarterly, 99 pp481–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. and Gao, X. (2006) ‘Appraisal of the Style of Work: A Study of Public Participation of Government Performance Evaluation and Future Research Agenda’ (in Chinese). Chinese Public Administration, 250 pp22–5.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. and Wang, W. (2012) Does Participatory Budgeting Improve the Legitimacy of the Local Government? A Comparative Case Study of Two Cities in China. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71:2 pp122–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, B. (2008) Evaluation by Tens of Thousands of People: Preliminary Analysis of a New Practice of Performance Evaluation of Local Party-Government Agencies (in Chinese), Beijing: Beijing University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, S. (2010) ‘Reflections on Improving the Third-Party Evaluation of Government Performance: A Case Study of the DRABS in Wuhan’ (in Chinese). Study and Practice, 3 pp67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, F. et al. (2008) Overall Performance Evaluation of Local Governments in China: Theory, Method and Experiment in Guangdong (in Chinese), Beijing: China Economic Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, Y. (2003) Local Government and Politics in China: Challenge From Below, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar