2,722
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Institutionalization of New Public Management: The case of Singapore’s education system

REFERENCES

  • Andersen, S. C. (2008) The Impact of Public Management Reforms in Student Performance in Danish Schools. Public Administration, 86:2 pp541–58.
  • Aoki, N. (2012) Determinants of Japanese Local Governments’ Decisions Concerning Performance-Based Reward Systems for Teachers. International Journal of Public Administration, 35:11 pp703–14.
  • Cheung, A. B. L. (2005) The Politics of Administrative Reforms in Asia: Paradigms and Legacies, Path and Diversities. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 18:2 pp257–82.
  • Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2008) NPM and Beyond – Structure, Culture and Demography. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74:1 pp7–23.
  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S. and Tinkler, J. (2005) New Public Management Is Dead – Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16:3 pp467–94.
  • Fattore, G., Dubois, H. F. W. and Lapenta, A. (2012) Measuring New Public Management and Governance in Political Debate. Public Administration Review, 72:2 pp218–27.
  • French, P. E. and Goodman, D. (2012) An Assessment of the Current and Future State of Human Resource Management at the Local Government Level. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32:1 pp62–74.
  • Gopinathan, S. (2007) Globalisation, the Singapore Developmental State and Education Policy: A Thesis Revisited. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 5:1 pp53–70.
  • Hairon, S. and Dimmock, C. (2011) Singapore Schools and Professional Learning Communities: Teacher Professional Development and School Leadership in an Asian Hierarchical System. Educational Review, 64:4 pp405–24.
  • Hansen, J. R. (2011) Application of Strategic Management Tools After an NPM-Inspired Reform: Strategy as Practice in Danish schools. Administration & Society, 43:7 pp770–806.
  • Hartley, D. (2003) Education as a Global Positioning Device: Some Theoretical Considerations. Comparative Education, 39:4 pp439–50.
  • Hood, C. (1991) A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69 pp3–19.
  • Hood, C. (1995) The New Public Management in the 1980’s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting,Organization and Society, 20:2–3 pp93–109.
  • Hussin, M. (2000) Illiberal Democracy and the Future of Opposition in Singapore. Third World Quarterly, 21:2 pp313–42.
  • Kane, J. and Patapan, H. (2006) The Hidden Problem of Managerial Reform. Public Administration Review, 66:5 pp711–24.
  • Karlsen, G. E. (2000) Decentralized Centralism: Framework for a Better Understanding of Governance in the Field of Education. Journal of Education Policy, 15:5 pp525–38.
  • Lee, E. W. Y. and Haque, M. S. (2006) The New Public Management Reform and Governance in Asian NICs: A Comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 19:4 pp605–26.
  • Mascarenhas, R. C. (1993) Building an Enterprise Culture in the Public Sector: Reform of the Public Sector in Australia, Britain, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 53:4 pp319–28.
  • McGuire, L. (2001) Service Charters – Global Convergence or National Divergence? A Comparison of Initiatives in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Public Management Review, 3:4 pp493–524.
  • Meyer, R. E. and Hammerschmid, G. (2010) The Degree of Decentralization and Individual Decision Making in Central Government Human Resource Management: A European Comparative Perspective. Public Administration, 88:2 pp455–78.
  • Ministry of Education, Singapore (MOE). (1997) ‘Speech by Minister for Education, Radm (NS) Teo Chee Hean at the Official Opening of the New Campus of Tanjong Katong Girls’ School on Friday 11 July 1997: Improving School Management through School Clusters’. Available at http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/1997/110797.htm (accessed 13 November 2012).
  • Ministry of Education, Singapore (MOE) (2005) ‘Greater Support for Teachers and School Leaders’. Available at http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2005/pr20050922b.htm (accessed 23 June 2012).
  • Ministry of Education, Singapore (MOE) (2008) ‘Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong at the Opening of the 7th International Conference on Thinking on Monday, 2 June 1997, at 9.00 AM at the Suntec City Convention Centre Ballroom: Shaping Out Future: Thinking Schools, Learning Nation’. Available at http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/1997/020697.htm (accessed 23 June 2012).
  • Ministry of Education, Singapore (MOE) (2010a) Education Statistics Digest 2010. Available at http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/education-statistics-digest/files/esd-2010.pdf (accessed 9 July 2012).
  • Ministry of Education, Singapore (MOE). (2010b) ‘Press Releases: International OECD Study Affirms the High Quality of Singapore’s Education System’. Available at http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2010/12/programme-for-international-student-assessment-2009.php (accessed 9 July 2012).
  • Ministry of Education, Singapore (MOE). (2012a) ‘MOE Removes Secondary School Banding and Revamps School Awards’. Available at http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2012/09/moe-removes-secondary-school-b.php (accessed 9 October 2012).
  • Ministry of Education, Singapore (MOE). (2012b) ‘Salary and Benefits’. Available at http://www.moe.gov.sg/careers/teach/career-info/salary (accessed 23 June 2012).
  • Mok, K. (2003) Decentralization and Marketization of Education in Singapore: A Case Study of the School Excellence Model. Journal of Educational Administration, 41:4 pp348–66.
  • Ng, P. T. (2003) The Singapore School and the School Excellence Model. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2:1 pp27–39.
  • Ng, P. T. and Chan, D. (2008) A Comparative Study of Singapore’s School Excellence Model with Hong Kong’s School-Based Management. International Journal of Educational Management, 22:6 pp488–505.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009) PISA Data Analysis Manual, SPSS® 2nd ed, Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011) Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education: Lessons from PISA for the United States, Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Osborne, S. P. (2006) The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8:3 pp377–87.
  • Poister, T. H. and Streib, G. (1995) MBO in Municipal Government: Variations on a Traditional Management Tool. Public Administration Review, 55:1 pp48–56.
  • Pollitt, C. (2001) Clarifying Convergence: Striking Similarities and Durable Differences in Public Management Reform. Public Management Review, 3:4 pp471–92.
  • Quah, J. S. T. (2010) Public Administration Singapore-Style, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Rodden, J. (2004) Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement. Comparative Politics, 36:4 pp481–500.
  • Sarker, A. E. (2006) New Public Management in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Success and Failure with Particular Reference to Singapore and Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19:2 pp180–203.
  • Schick, A. (1998) Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand Reforms. The World Bank Research Observer, 13:1 pp123–31.
  • Steiner, L. (2010) Using Competency Based Evaluation to Drive Teacher Excellence: Lessons from Singapore, Chapel Hill, NC: Public Impact.
  • Swiss, J. E. (1983) Establishing a Management System: The Interaction of Power Shifts and Personality under Federal MBO. Public Administration Review, 43:3 pp238–45.
  • Tan, K. P. (2008) Meritocracy and Eliticism in a Global City: Ideological Shift in Singapore. International Political Science Review/Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 29:1 pp7–27.
  • Van de Walle, S. and Hammerschmid, G. (2011) The Impact of the New Public Management: Challenges for Coordination and Cohesion in European Public Sectors. Halduskultuur-Administrative Culture, 12:2 pp190–209.
  • Van Helden, G. J. and Jansen, E. P. (2003) New Public Management in Dutch Local Government. Local Government Studies, 29:2 pp68–88.
  • Verschuere, B. and Barbieri, D. (2009) Investigating the ‘NPM-ness’ of Agencies in Italy and Flanders. Public Management Review, 11:3 pp345–73.
  • Vigoda, E. (2002) From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 62:5 pp527–40.
  • Wang, X. (2002) Assessing Administrative Accountability: Results from a National Survey. The American Review of Public Administration, 32:3 pp350–70.
  • Wilkesmann, U. and Schmid, C. J. (2012) The Impacts of New Governance on Teaching at German Universities: Findings from a National Survey. Higher Education, 63 pp33–52.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.