The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom

REFERENCES

• Alford, J. (2002a) Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social Exchange Perspective. Public Administration Review, 62:3 pp337–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2002b) Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce? Toward a Contingency Theory. Administration & Society, 34:1 pp32–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2009) Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service-Delivery to Co-Production, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. and O’Flynn, J. (2012) Rethinking Public Service Delivery: Managing with External Providers, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. and Speed, R. (2006) Client Focus in Regulatory Agencies: Oxymoron or Opportunity? Public Management Review, 8:2 pp313–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. (1969) A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35:4 pp216–24.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Co-operation, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007) Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Co-Production of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 67:5 pp846–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (1985) To Punish or Persuade: Enforcement of Coal Mine Safety, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. (1995) Games of Engagement: Postures within the Regulatory Community. Law and Policy, 17:3 pp225–55.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T. and Helderman, J.-K. (2012) The Trade-Off Between Capital and Community: The Conditions for Successful Co-Production in Housing. Voluntas, 23 pp1139–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clary, E., Snyder, M., Ridge, R., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. and Hagen, J. (1998) Understanding and Assessing the Motivations of Volunteers: A Functional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74:6 pp1516–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clary, E., Snyder, M. and Stukas, A. (1996) Volunteers’ Motivations: Findings from a National Survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25 pp485–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. and Ostrom, E. (1991) A Public Economy Approach to Education: Choice and Co-production. International Political Science Review, 12:4 pp313–35.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. (1997) Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gersuny, C. and Rosengren, W. (1973) The Service Society, Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gronroos, C. (1978) A Service Oriented Approach to the Marketing of Services. European Journal of Marketing, 12:8 pp588–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronroos, C. (2007) Service Management and Marketing: Customer Management in Service Competition, Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (1982) Collective Action, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahnemann, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk. Econometrica, 47: pp313–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax, D. and Sebenius, J. (1986) The Manager as Negotiator, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J. (2006) Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelock, C. (1983) Classifying Services to Gain Strategic Marketing Insights. Journal of Marketing, 47:3 pp9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusch, R. and Vargo, S. eds. (2006) The Service Dominant Logic of Marketing, New York: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• MFB (Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board). (2012) Annual Report 2011–2012, Melbourne: MFB.
   Google Scholar
• Mosher, F. (1980) The Changing Responsibilities and Tactics of the Federal Government. Public Administration Review, 40:6 pp541–48.
   Google Scholar
• Normann, R. (1991) Service Management: Strategy and Leadership in Service Business, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011) Together for Better Public Services: Partnering with Citizens and Civil Society, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2006) The New Public Governance. Public Management Review, 8:3 pp377–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., Radnor, Z. and Nasi, G. (2012) A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach.American Review of Public Administration, 43:2 pp135–58.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. and Strokosch, K. (2013, in press) It Takes Two To Tango? Understanding the Co-Production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives. British Journal of Management.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1993a) Communitarian Approach to Local Governance. National Civic Review, 82:3 pp226–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1993b) Covenanting, Co-Producing and the Good Society. The Newsletter of PEGS, 3:2 pp7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996) Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development. World Development, 24:6 pp1073–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1998) The Comparative Study of Public Economies. The American Economist, 42:1 pp3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2000) Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14:3 pp137–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2007) A Diagnostic Approach for Going Beyond Panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104:39 pp15181–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2008) ‘Polycentric Systems as One Approach for Solving Collective Action Problems.’ Research Paper No. 2008-11-02, School of Environmental and Public Affairs, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009) ‘Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems.’ Nobel Prize Lecture, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V. and Ostrom, E. (1977) ‘Public Goods and Public Choices’ in E. S. Savas (ed.) Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Janssen, M. and Anderies, J. (2007) Going Beyond Panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104:39 pp15176–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Parks, R. B., Whitaker, G. P. and Percy, S. L. (1978) The Public Service Production Process: A Framework for Analyzing Police Services. Policy Studies Journal, 7: pp381–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. and Warren, R. (1961) The Organisation of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55:4 pp831–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P. and Wison, R. (1981) Consumers as Co-producers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9:7 pp1001–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Percy, S. (1978) Conceptualizing and Measuring Citizen Coproduction of Community Safety. Policy Studies Journal, 7: Special Issue pp486–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2006) Citizens and Co-Production of Welfare Services: Childcare in Eight European Countries. Public Management Review, 8:4 pp503–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T. and Verschuere, B. (2012) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-production, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, R. (1981) Interaction of the Voluntary and Governmental Sectors: Toward an Understanding of the Coproduction of Municipal Services. Administration and Society, 13:1 pp59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosentraub, M. and Sharp, E. (1981) Consumers as Producers of Social Services: Coproduction and the Level of Social Services. Southern Review of Public Administration, 4: March pp502–39.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. (1980) Toward a New Understanding of Urban Services and Citizen Participation: The Co-Production Concept. Midwest Review of Public Administration, 14: June pp105–18.
   Google Scholar
• Shostack, G. L. (1993) How to Design a Service. European Journal of Marketing, 16:1 pp49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Sigmund, K. (2007) Punish or Perish? Retaliation and Collaboration Among Humans. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22:11 pp593–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (1995) Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (2012) Citizen, Customer, Partner: Engaging the Public in Public Management, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T. and Pestoff, V. (2012) Co-Production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23:4 pp1083–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, G. (1980) Co-Production: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery. Public Administration Review, 40: May/June pp240–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (1973) Political Organization, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar