Patient and Public Participation in the English NHS: An assessment of experimental implementation processes

REFERENCES

• Allen, P. (2006) New Localism in the English National Health Service: What Is It For? Health Policy, 79:2/3 pp244–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008) Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 18:4 pp543–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggott, R. (2005) A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum? Reforming Patient and Public Involvement in the NHS in England. Public Administration, 83:3 pp533–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., Newman, J., Knops, A. and Sullivan, H. (2003) Constituting ‘The Public’ in Public Participation. Public Administration, 81:2 pp379–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. and Burgess, R. G. (1994) Analyzing Qualitative Data, New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1972) A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 pp1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deLeon, P. and deLeon, L. (2002) What Ever Happened to Policy Implementation? An Alternative Approach. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 12:4 pp467–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J.-L., Lamothe, L. and Langley, A. (2001) The Dynamics of Collective Leadership and Strategic Change in Pluralistic Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44:4 pp809–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, A. and Le Grand, J. (2006) Is Greater Patient Choice Consistent with Equity? The Case of the English NHS. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 11 pp162–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. and Klijn, E.-H. (2006) Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Six Interactive Processes in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 16:3 pp417–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) Building Theory from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14:4 pp532–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exworthy, M., Berney, L. and Powell, M. (2002) How Great Expectations in Westminster Are Being Dashed Locally. The Local Implementation of National Policy on Health Inequalities. Policy and Politics, 30 pp79–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotaki, M. (2007) Patient Choice in Healthcare in England and Sweden: From Quasi-Market and Back to Market? A Comparative Analysis of Failure in Learning. Public Administration, 85:4 pp1059–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotaki, M. (2011) Towards Developing New Partnerships in Public Services: Users as Consumers, Citizens and/or Co-Producers in Health and Social Care in England and Sweden. Public Administration, 89:3 pp933–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudge, N., Wolfe, C. D. A. and McKevitt, C. (2008) Assessing the Promise of User Involvement in Health Service Development: Ethnographic Study. BMJ, 336:7639 pp313–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A., Ross, D. and Mirzoev, T. (2007) Primary Health Care and England: The Coming of Age of Alma Ata? Health Policy, 80:1 pp11–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greener, I. and Powell, M. (2008) The Changing Governance of the NHS: Reform in a Post-Keynesian Health Service. Human Relations, 61:5 pp617–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M. and Hupe, P. (2002) Implementing Public Policy, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, P. and Davies, H. T. O. (2004) Service Design, Culture and Performance: Collusion and Co-Production in Health Care. Human Relations, 57:11 pp1407–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King’s Fund. (2002) The Future of the NHS: A Framework for Debate, London: King’s Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, C., Peckham, S. and Taylor, P. (1998) Managing Public Involvement in Healthcare Purchasing, Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. P. (2008) Representativeness, Legitimacy and Power in Public Involvement in Health-Service Management. Social Science & Medicine, 67:11 pp1757–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G. P. (2011) The Third Sector, User Involvement and Public Service Reform: A Case Study in the Co-Governance of Health Service Provision. Public Administration, 89:3 pp909–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E. (1995) Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 5:2 pp145–74.
   Google Scholar
• McCreadie, C., Mathew, D., Filinson, R. and Askham, J. (2008) Ambiguity and Cooperation in the Implementation of Adult Protection Policy. Social Policy & Administration, 42:3 pp248–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, R. (2007) Our Reforms, Our Partnerships, Same Problems: The Chronic Case of the English NHS. Public Money & Management, 27:1 pp77–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty, T. and Ferlie, E. (2002) Re-Engineering Health Care – The Complexities of Organizational Transformation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. and Huberman, M. B. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Milewa, T. (2004) Local Participatory Democracy in Britain’s Health Service: Innovation or Fragmentation of a Universal Citizenship. Social Policy & Administration, 38 pp240–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., Barnes, M., Sullivan, H. and Knops, A. (2004) Public Participation and Collaborative Governance. Journal of Social Policy, 33:2 pp203–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J., Thompson, A., Tschirhart, M., Mesch, D. and Lee, G. (1999) Inside a Swiss Army Knife: An Assessment of AmeriCorps. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9:2 pp225–50.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, S., Sheaff, R. and Dowling, B. (2006) Exit, Voice, Governance and User-Responsiveness: The Case of English Primary Care Trusts. Social Science & Medicine, 63:2 pp373–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, C., Robert, G., Bate, P., Le May, A. and Gabbay, J. (2006) Lost in Translation: A Multi-Level Case Study of the Metamorphosis of Meanings and Action in Public Sector Organizational Innovation. Public Administration, 84:1 pp59–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2004) Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation. American Review of Public Administration, 34:4 pp315–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, R. and Shepherd, M. (2002) Public Participation in the New NHS: No Closer to Citizen Control? Social Policy & Administration, 36:3 pp275–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2004) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, 2nd Edition, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. and Dillon, L. (2004) Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence, London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. S. F., Dempster, P. G., Keen, J., Allen, P. and Hutchings, A. (2012) The New Governance Arrangements for NHS Foundation Trust Hospitals: Reframing Governors as Meta-Regulators. Public Administration, 90:2 pp351–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994) Case Study Research, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar