Why People Co-Produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services

REFERENCES

• Abdi, H. (2003) ‘Factor Rotations in Factor Analyses’ in M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman and T. Futing (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Sciences Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2002a) Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce? Toward a Contingency Theory. Administration & Society, 34:1 pp32–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2002b) Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social-Exchange Perspective. Public Administration Review, 62:3 pp337–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2009) Engaging Public Sector Clients. From Service-Delivery to Co-Production. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Amnå, E. (2010) ‘Active, Passive, or Stand-by Citizens? Latent and Manifest Political Participation’ in E. Amna (ed.) New Forms of Citizen Participation. Normative Implications. Nomos: Baden-Baden, pp191–203.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. B., Kristensen, N. and Pedersen, L. H. (2011) ‘Public Service Efficacy’. Paper presented at the 33rd EGPA Conference, Bucharest. Available at http://soc.kuleuven.be/io/egpa/HRM/bucharest/Andersen-Kristensen&Pedersen2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007) Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, September/October pp846-60.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. and Löfffler, E. (2012) ‘From Engagement to Co-Production: How Users and Communities Contribute to Public Services’ in V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York, NY: Routledge, pp35–60.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., Pestoff, V. and Verschuere, B. (2012) ‘Co-Production as a Maturing Concept’ in V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, New York, NY: Routledge, pp1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T. and Van Hout, E. (2006) Co-Management in Public Service Networks. The Organizational Effects. Public Management Review, 8:4 pp537–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A. (2003) Building Social Capital: Civic Attitudes and Behavior of Public Servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13:1 pp5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A., Selden, S. C. and Facer II, R. L. (2000) Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 60:May/June pp254–64.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1980) Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1993) A Primer on Q Methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16 pp91–138.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1996) Q Methodology and Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 6:4 pp561–7.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G. and Silver, G. E. (1990) Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items. Political Behavior, 12:3 pp289–314.
   Google Scholar
• Dees, J. G. (2001) ‘The Meaning of “Social Entrepreneurship”’. Paper published by the Centre for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Duke University, Durham, NC. Available at http://www.docstoc.com/docs/46020012/The-Meaning-of-Social-Entrepreneurship-J-Gregory-Dees
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, P. and Halman, L. (2003) ‘Volunteering and Values: An Introduction’ in P. Dekker and L. Halman (eds) The Values of Volunteering. Cross-Cultural Perspectives. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic, pp1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. and Berejikian, J. (1993) Reconstructive Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review, 87:1 pp48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heemhaven. (2009) Nieuws van de cliëntenraad, September 2009, Heemstede: Zorgbalans Heemhaven.
   Google Scholar
• Ishkanian, A. and Szreter, S. eds (2012) The Big Society Debate. A New Agenda for Social Welfare?, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A. and Moore, M. (2004) Institutionalised Co-Production: Unorthodox Public Service Delivery in Challenging Environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40:4 pp31–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinetto, M. (2003) Who Wants To Be an Active Citizen? The Politics and Practice of Community Involvement. Sociology, 37:1 pp103–20.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2010) Delivering Public Services: Time for a New Theory? Public Management Review, 12:1 pp1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overheid.nl. (2012) Wet medezeggenschap cliënten zorginstellingen. Available at www.wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0007920/. Consulted March 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., Wright, B. E. and Moynihan, D. P. (2008) Public Service Motivation and Interpersonal Citizenship Behavior in Public Organizations: Testing a Preliminary Model. International Public Management Journal, 11:1 pp89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P. and Wilson, R. (1981) Consumers as Co-Producers of Public Services. Some Institutional and Economic Considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9:7 pp1001–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. and Hondeghem, A. eds (2008) Motivation in Public Management. The Call of Public Service, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2012) ‘Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe’ in V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York, NY: Routledge, pp13–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T. and Verschuere, B. eds (2012) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, P. and Selbee, L. K. (2003) ‘Do People Who Volunteer Have a Dinstinctive Ethos? A Canadian Study’ in P. Dekker and L. Halman (eds) The Values of Volunteering. Cross-Cultural Perspectives. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid [National Government]. (2011) Wat zijn de bevoegdheden van een cliëntenraad in een zorginstelling? Available at http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/goed-bestuur-in-de-zorg/vraag-enantwoord/wat-zijn-de-bevoegdheden-van-een-clientenraad-in-eenzorginstelling.html. Consulted October 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, F. M. (2012) A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111 pp335–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. (1978) ‘Citizen Organizations and Participation in Law Enforcement Advocacy and Coproduction: The Role of Incentives’. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. B. (1984) Citizen-Demand Making in the Urban Context. American Journal of Political Science, 28:4 pp654–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, T. (2006) Public Sector Motivation: Is There Something to Learn from the Study of Volunteerism? Public Policy and Administration, 21:1 pp49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Timpone, R. J. (1998) Structure, Behavior, and Voter Turnout in the United States. The American Political Science Review, 92:1 pp145–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Bovenkamp, H. M. (2010) The Limits of Patient Power. Examining Active Citizenship in Dutch Health Care, Rotterdam: Optima Grafische Communicatie.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P. and Verhoef, P. C. (2010) Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions. Journal of Service Research, 13:3 pp253–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C. and Steen, T. (2012) ‘Motivated for Active Citizenship. Comprehending Citizens’ Motivation to Participate in Coproduction of Public Services by Bringing in the Concept of Public Service Motivation’. Paper presented at the Winelands Conference, Stellenboschs, 2–4 April 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Van Exel, N. J. A. and de Graaf, G. (2005) ‘Q methodology: A Sneak Preview’. Electronic article published on Qmethodology.net: Q-methodology Tutorial, Studies, Literature, Data and Links to Web Resources. Available at http://www.qmethodology.net/index.php?page=1&year=2005
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2008) Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36:1 pp1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, I. (2009) Burgers tegen beleid. Een analyse van dynamiek in politieke betrokkenheid, Amsterdam: Aksant.
   Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T. and Pestoff, V. (2012) Co-Production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20:1 pp1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid [Scientific Council for Government Policy] (WRR). (2004) Bewijzen van goede dienstverlening. Rapport nr. 70, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuidgeest, M., Luijkx, K. G., Westert, G. P. and Delnoij, D. M. J. (2011) Legal Rights of Client Councils and Their Role in Policy of Long-Term Care Organisations in the Netherlands. BMC Health Services Research, 11 pp215–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar