Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production

REFERENCES

• Alcock, P. (2010) Building Big Society: A New Policy Environment for the Third Sector in England. Voluntary Sector Review, 1:3 pp379–89.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2002) Why Do Public Sector Clients Co-Produce? Towards a Contingency Theory. Administration & Society, 34:1 pp32–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2009) Engaging Public Sector Clients. From Service Delivery to Co-Production, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, M. (2005) ‘The Political Economy of Peer Production’ in A. Kroker and M. Kroker (eds) 1,000 Days of Theory. Available at www.etheory.net/articles.aspx?id=449
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., van der Donk, W. and Putters, K. (2003) Griffins or Chameleons? Hybridity as a Permanent and Inevitable Characteristic of the Third Sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28:9–10 pp749–65.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. and Tufte, E. (1973) Size and Democracy, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galera, G. and Borzaga, C. (2009) ‘Social Enterprise. An International Overview of its Conceptual Evolution and Legal Implications. Social Enterprise Journal, 5:3 pp210–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. and Benington, J. (2006) Copy and Paste, or Graft and Transplant? Knowledge Sharing Through Inter-Organizational Networks. Public Money & Management, 26:2 pp101–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2012) ‘Competition or Co-Production? Which Way for Governance in Health and Wellbeing?’ in E. Loeffler D. Taylor-Goodby, T. Bovaird, F. Hine-Hughes and L. Wilkes (eds) Making Health and Social Care Personal and Local. Moving From Mass Production to Co-Production. London: London Governance International & Local Government Information Unit. www.govint.org and www.lgiu.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M. (2002) Själv Men Inte Ensam. Om Självhjälpsgrupper I Sverige, Stockholm: Institution for Socialt Arbete.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, J. and Knapp, M. (1995) ‘A Loose & Baggy Monster: Boundaries, Definitions and Typologies’ in D. J.Smith, C. Rochester and R. Hedley (eds) An Introduction to the Voluntary Sector. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2012) ‘Co-Production in an Information Age, Chapter 10’ in V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen and V. Verscheure (eds) New Public Governance, The Third Sector and Co-Production. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011) Together for Better Public Service. Partnering with Citizens and Civil Society, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, M. (1971 [1965]) The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z. and Nasi, G. (2013) A New Theory for Public Service Management? Towards a (Public) Service Dominant Approach. American Review of Public Administration Review, 43:2 pp135–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1975) The Delivery of Urban Services: Outcomes of Change, Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1999) ‘Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development, Chapter 15’ in M. D.McGinnis (ed) Polycentric Governance and Development. Readings From the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2000) Crowding Out Citizenship. Scandinavian Political Studies, 23:1 pp1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009) ‘Social Cooperation in Collective-Action Situations’ in H. J. Rösner and F. Schulz-Nieswandt (eds) Neue Kölner Genossenschaftswissenschaft. Cologne: Work & Cooperative Sciences Institute, AGI Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivoret, M. B., Whitaker, G. P. and Wilson, R. (1981, 1999) Consumers as Co-Producers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9: pp1001–11; reprinted as ‘Chapter 17’ in McGinnis, D. Michael ed. (1999) Local Public Economies. Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (1998) Beyond the Market and State: Civil Democracy & Social Enterprise in a Welfare Society, Aldershot & Brookfield: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2006, 2009) Citizens as Co-Producers of Welfare Services: Preschool Services in Eight European Countries. Public Management Review, 8:4 pp503–20; reprinted in V. Pestoff and T. Brandsen (eds) Co-production. The Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2008) A Democratic Architecture for the Welfare State: Promoting Citizen Participation, the Third Sector and Co-Production, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2009) Towards a Paradigm of Democratic Participation: Citizen Participation and Co-Production of Personal Social Services in Sweden. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80:2 pp197–224.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2012a) ‘Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Crucial Conceptual Issues, Chapter 2’ in V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen and V. Verscheure (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2012b) ‘Hybrid Tendencies in Consumer Cooperatives: The Case of Sweden; Ch. 9’ in D.McDonnell and E. Macknight (eds) The Co-Operative Model in Practice. International Perspectives. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen & Co-operative Educational Trust Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (forthcoming) Hybridity, Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe. American Behavioral Scientists.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T. and Verscheure, V. (eds) (2012) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, C. (1981) Interaction of Voluntary and Governmental Sectors: Towards an Understanding of Co-Production of Municipal Service. Administration & Society, 13 pp59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm Werkö, S. (2008) Patient Patients? Achieving Patient Empowerment Through Active Participation, Increased Knowledge and Organization, Stockholm: School of Business.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2011) Community Organizing and the Big Society: Is Saul Alinisky Turning in His Grave? Voluntary Sector Review, 3:3 pp299–328.
   Google Scholar
• Vamstad, J. (2007) ‘Governing Welfare: The Third Sector and the Challenges to the Swedish Welfare State’. PhD thesis, Mid-Sweden University Doctoral Thesis No. 37, Ö stersund.
   Google Scholar
• Vamstad, J. (2012) ‘Co-Production and Service Quality: A New Perspective on the Swedish Welfare State, Chapter 16’ in V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen and V. Verscheure (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York: Routledge; reprinted in Voluntas, December 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Verscheure, B., Brandsen, T. and Pestoff, V. (2012) Co-Production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda. Voluntas, 23:4 pp1083–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal, I. (2013) ‘Governance of Social Enterprises as Producers of Public Services, Ch. 10’ in P. Valkama, S. Bailey and A.-V. Anttiroiko (eds) Organisational Innovation in Public Services. Forms and Governance. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar