Restoring Trust Through the Co-Production of Public Services: A theoretical elaboration

REFERENCES

• Alford, J. (2002) Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce? Toward a Contingency Theory. Administration and Society, 34:1 pp32–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2009) Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service-Delivery to Co-Production, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2011) ‘Public Value From Co-Production by Clients’ in J. Bennington and M. H. Moore (eds) Public Value: Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp144–57.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, D. (1994) Using Panel Data to Estimate the Effects of Events. Sociological Methods and Research, 23:2 pp174–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001) Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52:1 pp1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, A. (2010) Co-production. A Series of Commissioned Reports, London: Local Authorities and Research Councils’ Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V. and Meijer, A. (2010) Cocreatie in De Publieke Sector, Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Bendapudi, N. and Leone, R. P. (2003) Psychological Implications of Customer Participation in Co-Production. Journal of Marketing, 67:1 pp14–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørnskov, C. (2011) Combating Corruption: On the Interplay between Institutional Quality and Social Trust. Journal of Law and Economics, 54:1 pp135–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. and Van de Walle, S. (2003) Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction as Indicators of ‘Good Governance’: Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69:3 pp329–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007) Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 67:5 pp846–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. and Löffler, E. (2012) ‘From Engagement to Co-Production – How Users and Communities Contribute to Public Services’ in V. A. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York: Routledge. pp35–60.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, D. and Harris, M. (2009) The Challenge of Co-Production. How Equal Partnerships Between Professionals and the Public Are Crucial to Improving Public Services, London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T. and Helderman, J.-K. (2012) ‘The Conditions for Successful Co-Production in Housing: A Case Study of German Housing Cooperatives’ in V. A. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York: Routledge. pp169–191.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T. and Pestoff, V. A. (2006) Co-Production, the Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services. Public Management Review, 8:4 pp493–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L. (1984) Local Coproduction of Services and the Analysis of Municipal Productivity. Urban Affairs Review, 19:4 pp465–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L. and England, R. E. (1983) Toward a Definition of the Co-Production Concept. Public Administration Review, 43:1 pp59–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonanno, P., Montolio, D. and Vanin, P. (2009) Does Social Capital Reduce Crime?. Journal of Law and Economics, 52:1 pp145–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahn, E. S. (2000) No More Throw-Away People: The Co-Production Imperative, Washington, DC: Essential Books.
   Google Scholar
• Considine, M. and Lewis, J. M. (2003) Bureaucracy, Network, or Enterprise? Comparing Models of Governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63:2 pp131–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, J. D. (1999) ‘Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies’ in P. Norris (ed) Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp57–77.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A. (2005) Mixed Welfare Systems and Hybrid Organizations: Changes in the Governance and Provision of Social Services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28:2 pp737–48.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, J. (2005) Working Together: Neighbourhood Watch, Reassurance Policing and the Potential of Partnerships, Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S. (1997) A Constitution for Knaves Crowds Out Civic Virtues. The Economic Journal, 107:443 pp1043–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S. and Jegen, R. (2001) Motivation Crowding Theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15:5 pp589–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1968) Power and Discontent, Homewood: Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A. and Warner, M. (2004) Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14:2 pp171–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1982) Shifting Involvements, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991) A Public Management for All Seasons?. Public Administration, 69:1 pp3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, P. and Davies, H. T. O. (2004) Service Design, Culture and Performance: Collusion and Co-Production in Health Care. Human Relations, 57:11 pp1407–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (2001) ‘Trust, Well-Being and Democracy’ in M. E. Warren (ed) Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp88–120.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2000) The Global Public Management Revolution, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H. and Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997) Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H. (2010) ‘Trust in Governance Networks: Looking for Conditions for Innovative Solutions and Outcomes’ in S. P. Osborne (ed) The New Public Governance?: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. New York: Routledge. 303–336.
   Google Scholar
• Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1997) Does Inequality Harm Growth Only in Democracies? A Replication and Extension. American Journal of Political Science, 41:1 pp323–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer, M. and Tonkens, E. (2006) ‘Authority, Trust, Knowledge and the Public Good in Disarray’ in J. W. Duyvendak, T. Knijn, and M. Kremer (eds) Policy, People, and the New Professional: De-Professionalisation and Re-Professionalisation in Care and Welfare. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. pp122–134.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, C. H. and Fisher, G. (1984) Citizenship and Service Delivery – The Promise of Coproduction. Public Administration Review, 44:Special Issue: Citizenship and Public Administration pp178–89.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J. and Bunker, B. B. (1996) ‘Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships’ in R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (eds) Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp114–139.
   Google Scholar
• Löffler, E. (2009) Why Co-Production Is an Important Topic for Local Government, Birmingham: Governance International.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1979) Trust and Power, Chisester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• MacStravic, S. (2000) The Downside of Patient Empowerment. Health Forum Journal, 43:1 pp30–1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marks, M. B. (2009) A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of Co-Production Interventions for Involuntary Youth in the Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice Systems, New York: State University of New York at Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. B. (2012) Time Banking Service Exchange Systems: A Review of the Research and Policy and Practice Implications in Support of Youth in Transition. Children and Youth Services Review, 34:7 pp1230–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschall, M. J. and Stolle, D. (2004) Race and the City: Neighborhood Context and the Development of Generalized Trust. Political Behavior, 26:2 pp125–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H. and Chervany, N. L. (2001) ‘Trust and Distrust Definitions: One Bite at a Time’ in R. Falcone, M. Singh, and Y. H. Tan (eds) Trust in Cyber-Societies: Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives. Berlin: Springer. pp27–54.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2012) ‘Co-Production in an Information Age’ in V. A. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York: Routledge. pp192–208.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, A. K. (1996) ‘Organizational Responses to Crisis: The Centrality of Trust’ in R. M. Kramer and T. Tyler (eds) Trust in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp261–87.
   Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. (1996) Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, C. and Carr, S. (2009) Co-Production: An Emerging Evidence Base for Adult Social Care Transformation, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S., Zelikow, P. D. and King, D. C. (1997) Why People Don’t Trust Government, Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2000) Government of the Future, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. (1999) ‘How Can We Trust Our Fellow Citizens?’ in M. E. Warren (ed) Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp42–87.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2010a) ‘Public Governance and Public Services Delivery: A Research Agenda for the Future’ in S. P. Osborne (ed) The New Public Governance?: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. New York: Routledge. pp413–28.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2010b) Delivering Public Services: Time for a New Theory?. Public Management Review, 12:1 pp1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. and Strokosch, K. (2013) It Takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-Production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives. British Journal of Management, 24 ppS31–S47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996) Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development. World Development, 24:6 pp1073–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1998) A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997. The American Political Science Review, 92:1 pp1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2000) Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14:3 pp137–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouschan, R., Sweeney, J. and Johnson, L. (2006) Customer Empowerment and Relationship Outcomes in Healthcare Consultations. European Journal of Marketing, 40:9/10 pp1068–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., Baker, C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V. and Wilson, R. (1981) Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9:7 pp1001–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pattie, C. and Johnston, R. (1998) Voter Turnout at the British General Election of 1992: Rational Choice, Social Standing or Political Efficacy?. European Journal of Political Research, 33:2 pp263–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy, S. L. (1984) Citizen Participation in the Coproduction of Urban Services. Urban Affairs Review, 19:4 pp431–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. A. (2006) Citizens and Co-Production of Welfare Services – Childcare in Eight European Countries. Public Management Review, 8:4 pp503–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. A. (2009) A Democratic Architecture for the Welfare State, London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. A. (2012) ‘Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Crucial Conceptual Issues’ in V. A. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York: Routledge. 13–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. A., Brandsen, T. and Verschuere, B. (eds) (2012) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollit, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public Management Reform: An International Comparison, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pontes, M. and Pontes, N. (1997) Variables That Influence Consumers’ Inferences About Physician Ability and Accountability. Health Care Management Review Spring 1997, 22:2 pp7–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. (1986) American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective. The American Political Science Review, 80:1 pp17–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R. Y. (1994) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajah, E., Marshall, R. and Nam, I. (2008) Relationship Glue: Customers and Marketers Co-Creating a Purchase Experience. Advances in Consumer Research, 35 pp367–73.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. and Camerer, C. (1998) Not so Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 23:3 pp393–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. and Baehler, K. (2010) Adding Value to Policy Analysis and Advice, Sydney: UNSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, A. B. (1997) The Problem of Trust, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, B. H. and Sherman, D. M. (1998) The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications. The Academy of Management Review, 23:3 pp422–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolle, D. (1998) Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations. Political Psychology, 19:3 pp497–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strokosch, K. (2012) The Co-Production of Public Services: Can Asylum Seekers Co-Produce? Paper Presented at the Annual conference of the International Research Society for Public Management, 11–13 April 2012, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Teichert, T. and Rost, K. (2003) Trust, Involvement Profile and Customer Retention – Modelling, Effects and Implications. International Journal of Technology Management, 26:5–6 pp621–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2005) Trust and Rule, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1990) Why People Obey the Law, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vamstad, J. (2007) Governing Welfare: The Third Sector and the Challenges to the Swedish Welfare State, Östersund: Mid Sweden University.
   Google Scholar
• Vamstad, J. (2012) ‘Co-Production and Service Quality: A New Perspective for the Swedish Welfare State’ in V. A. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York: Routledge. pp297–316.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S. (2010) ‘New Public Management: Restoring the Public Trust Through Creating Distrust?’ in T. Christenen and P. Lægreid (eds) Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp309–320.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S. and Bouckaert, G. (2003) Public Service Performance and Trust in Government: The Problem of Causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26:8–9 pp891–913.
   Google Scholar
• Vancoppenolle, D. and Verschuere, B. (2012) ‘The Challenges of Co-Management for Public Accountability: Lessons for Flemish Child Care’ in V. A. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York: Routledge. 297–316.
   Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, V., Lens, W., De Witte, H. and Feather, N. T. (2005) Understanding Unemployed People’s Job Search Behaviour, Unemployment Experience and Well-Being: A Comparison of Expectancy-Value Theory and Self-Determination Theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44:2 pp269–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T. and Pestoff, V. A. (2012) Co-Production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda. Voluntas, 23:4 pp1083–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, G. P. (1980) Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public administration review, 40: May/June pp240–6.
   Google Scholar
• Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A. and Werner, J. M. (1998) Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23:3 pp513–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, M. and Narayan, D. (2000) Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15:2 pp225–49.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T. (2001) ‘Trust as a Form of Social Intelligence’ in K. S. Cook (ed) Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. pp121–47.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T. and Cook, K. S. (1993) Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56:4 pp235–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T. and Yamagishi, M. (1994) Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18:2 pp129–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1986) ‘Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840 to 1920’ in L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior. vol. 8, Greenwich: JAI Press. pp55–111.
   Google Scholar