Managing Challenging Organizational Change: Introducing active labour market policies in Italian public employment agencies

REFERENCES

• Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. (1996) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Armenakis, A. A. and Bedeian, A. G. (1999) Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25:3 pp293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M. and Gallego, R. (2006) From ‘New Institutionalism’ to ‘Institutional Processualism’: Advancing Knowledge about Public Management Policy Change. Governance, 19:4 pp531–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckerman, A. and Fontana, L. (2001) The Transition from AFDC to PRWORA in Florida: Perceptions of the Role of Case Manager in Welfare Reform. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 28 pp29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K., Waterhouse, J. and Flynn, C. (2003) Change Management Practices – Is a Hybrid Model a Better Alternative for Public Sector Agencies? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16:3 pp230–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. and Anderson, S. R. (2000) Applying Large-Group Interaction Methods in the Planning and Implementation of Major Change Efforts. Public Administration Review, 60:2 pp143–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butera & Partners. (2002) Un Modello Organizzativo per I Nuovi Centri per L’impiego, Rome: Butera & Partners.
   Google Scholar
• Calmfors, L. (1994) Active Labour Market Policy and Unemployment – A Framework for the Analysis of Crucial Design Features. OECD Economic Studies No. 22 (Spring). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (2003) Unemployment Protection and Labour Market Reform in France and Great Britain in the 1990s: Solidarity versus Activation? Journal of Social Policy, 32:3 pp361–81.
   Google Scholar
• Coram, R. and Burnes, B. (2001) Managing Organisational Change in the Public Sector - Lessons from the Privatization of the Property Service Agency. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14:2 94–110.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D. and Donaldson, L. (1997) Towards a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review, 22:1 pp20–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davister, C., Defourny, J. and Gregoire, O. (2004) Work Integration Social Enterprises in the European Union: An Overview of Existing Models. EMES Working Papers No. 04/04. Liège: EMES European Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. (1994) Organizational Change: A Processual Approach, London: Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Devos, G., Buelens, M. and Bouckenooghe, D. (2007) Contribution of Content, Context, and Process to Understanding Openness to Organizational Change: Two Experimental Simulation Studies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147:6 pp607–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. and Davis, J. J. (1989) CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns: Agency Theory or Stewardship Theory. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. and Davis, J. J. (1991) Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16:1 pp49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. and Graebner, M. E. (2007) Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50:1 pp25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (1998) Communication COM (1998) 641, Brussels: EU Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S. and Rainey, H. G. (2006) Managing Successful Organizational Change in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review, 66 pp168–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. M. and Lyles, M. A. (1985) Organizational Learning. Academy of Management Review, 10:4 pp803–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D. (1998) ‘Concatenations of Mechanisms’ in P. Hedström and R. Swedberg (eds) Social Mechanisms: An Analytic Approach to Social Theory, pp102–25. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (2000) ‘Towards Public Accountability: Beyond Sampling, Reliability, and Validity’ in G. Gaskell and M. Bauer (eds) Qualitative Research with Image, Text, and Sound: A Practical Handbook, pp102–25, 336–50. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. L. and Bennett, A. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, P. (2012) Converging Worlds of Activation? Activation Policies and Governance in Europe and the Role of the EU. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32:5/6 pp312–26.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C. R. (1996) Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review, 21:4 pp1022–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrow, J. (2001) Capacity Building as a Public Management Goal: Myth, Magic or the Main Chance? Public Management Review, 3:2 pp209–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hedström, P. (2005) Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. eds. (1998) Social Mechanisms: An Analytic Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs, M. and Rowland, D. (2005) All Changes Great and Small: Exploring Approaches to Change and Its Leadership. Journal of Change Management, 5:2 pp121–51.
   Google Scholar
• Judson, A. S. (1991) Changing Behavior in Organizations: Minimizing Resistance to Change, Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, S. (2005) Unleashing Change: A Study of Organizational Renewal in Government, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M. (2010) Managing Emergent and Complex Change: The Case of Dutch Agencification. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76:3 pp489–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layard, R., Nickell, S. and Jackman, R. (1991) Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, B. and March, J. G. (1988) Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14 pp319–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1951) Field Theory in Social Science, New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin, M. and Skedinger, P. (2000) Decentralisation of Active Labour Market Policy: The Case of Swedish Local Employment Service Committees. Working Paper No. 6. Uppsala, Sweden: IFAU – Office of Labour Market Policy Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Lurie, I. and Riccucci, N. M. (2003) Changing the “Culture” of Welfare Offices: From Vision to the Front Lines. Administration & Society, 34 pp653–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler, J. (1997) Influences of Organizational Culture in Learning in Public Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7:4 pp519–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2000) Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society, 29:4 pp507–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. P. (2000) What Works among Active Labour Market Policies: Evidence from OECD Countries’ Experiences. OECD Economic Studies No. 30 2000/I. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J. and Winter, S. C. (2009) Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19:3 pp453–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. G. and Tilly, C. (2001) Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, M. K., Glaser, B. and Mac Donald, K. (1998) On the Front Lines of Welfare Delivery: Are Workers Implementing Policy Reforms? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17 pp1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. (1997) What Is a Processual Analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13 pp337–48.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W. and Cameron, K. S. (2001) Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research. The Academy of Management Journal, 44:4 pp697–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000) Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review, 94:2 pp251–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2004) Politics in Time. History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pruna, M. L. (2011) Mercato Del Lavoro in Sardegna: Rapporto 2011, Cagliari, Italy: CUEC.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (1987) The Comparative Method, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., Meyers, M. K., Lurie, I. and Han, J. S. (2004) The Implementation of Welfare Reform Policy: The Role of Public Managers in Front-Line Practices. Public Administration Review, 64 pp438–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1998) ‘Social Mechanisms and Social Dynamics’ in P. Hedström and R. Swedberg (eds) Social Mechanisms: An Analytic Approach to Social Theory, pp32–44. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J. and House, R. J. (1986) Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 pp171–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaden, E. and Robinson, J. (2010) Staff Narratives: Promising to Change ‘Welfare as We Know It’. Qualitative Social Work, 11:1 pp23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. W. (1993) Reorganizing Public Organizations: Alternatives, Objectives, and Evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3:4 pp457–86.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. (2011) Explaining the Willingness of Public Professionals to Implement New Policies: A Policy Alienation Framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77:3 pp555–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. and Karsten, N. (2012) Reflecting on the Role of Literature in Qualitative Public Administration Review: Learning from Grounded Theory. Administration & Society, 44:1 pp64–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, M., O’Reilly, D., Morris, J. and Deem, R. (2011) Public Service Leaders as ‘Change Agents’ – for Whom? Public Management Review, 13:1 pp65–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2000) ‘Emergent Change as a Universal in Organizations’ in M. Beer and N. Nohria (eds) Breaking the Code of Change, pp223–42. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2007) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, L. R. (2002) Public Management Reform: Competing Drivers of Change. Public Administration Review, 62:5 pp555–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar