Public Money and Mickey Mouse: Evaluating performance and accountability in the Hong Kong Disneyland joint venture public–private partnership

REFERENCES

• Balfour, F. 2009. “Disney Shanghai: Good for China, Bad for Hong Kong.” BusinessWeek, November 5.
   Google Scholar
• Balfour, F., and B. Einhorn. 2009. “Hong Kong Disneyland’s Future Is in Danger.” BusinessWeek, March 17.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, K. 2012. “Disneyfication and Localisation: The Cultural Globalisation Process of Hong Kong Disneyland.” Urban Studies 49 (2): 383–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy, L., and D. Eng. 2006. “5 Million Visit Disney Park, Short of Target.” South China Morning Post, September 5.
   Google Scholar
• Common, R. 2000. “The East Asia Region: Do Public-Private Partnerships Make Sense?” In Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective, edited by S. P. Osborne, 134–148. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crets, D. 2005. “Two Politicians Say They Will Demand that the Government Reveal Full Details of its Joint-Venture Agreement with Hong Kong Disneyland.” Hong Kong Standard, September 6.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., and G. R. Teisman. 2008. “Public-Private Partnership: On the Edge of Project and Process Management.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26 (3): 614–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, K. 2006. “Hong Kong a Roller Coaster for Disney.” Asia Times, January 6.
   Google Scholar
• Forrer, J., J. E. Kee, K. E. Newcomer, and E. Boyer. 2010. “Public–Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question.” Public Administration Review 70 (3): 475–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., and M. Lee. 2009. “Localizing a Global Amusement Park: Hong Kong Disneyland.” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 23 (2): 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Secretariat. 1999a. Economic Assessment of the Hong Kong Disneyland Project. Hong Kong SAR: Economic Analysis Division, Hong Kong Government.
   Google Scholar
• Government Secretariat. 1999b. Economic Assessment on Building a Walt Disney Theme Park in Hong Kong. Hong Kong SAR: Economic Analysis Division, Hong Kong Government.
   Google Scholar
• Government Secretariat. 1999c. Briefing Paper: Hong Kong Disneyland. Hong Kong SAR: Hong Kong Government.
   Google Scholar
• Grimsey, D., and M. Lewis. 2004. Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hayllar, M. R. 2010. “Public-Private Partnerships in Hong Kong: Good Governance – the Essential Missing Ingredient?” The Australian Journal of Public Administration 69 (S1): S99–S119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A., and C. Greve. 2007. “Public-Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review.” Public Administration Review 67 (3): 545–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A., and C. Greve. 2009. “PPPs: The Passage of Time Permits a Sober Reflection.” Economic Affairs 29 (1): 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Government. 2005. “LCQ6: Management of HK Disneyland.” Government Press Release, December 14.
   Google Scholar
• Iritani, E. 1999. “Middle Kingdom or Magic Kingdom?” Los Angeles Times, June 13.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffares, S., H. Sullivan, and T. Bovaird. 2009. “Beyond the Contract – The Challenge of Evaluating the Performance of Public-Private Partnerships.” Paper presented at the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM) meeting, Copenhagen, April 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kagami, M. 2002. “The Third Sector’s Failure in Japan.” In Private Initiatives in Infrastructure: Priorities, Incentives and Performance, edited by S. V. Berg, M. G. Pollitt, and M. Tsuji, 30–45. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., and G. R. Teisman. 2005. “Public-Private Partnerships as the Management of Co-Production: Strategic and Institutional Obstacles in a Difficult Marriage.” In The Challenge of Public-Private Partnerships: Learning From International Experience, edited by G. Hodge and C. Greve, 95–116. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, J. 2009. “Cuts Cloud Hong Kong Disneyland Expansion.” Financial Times, March 17.
   Google Scholar
• Legislative Council Secretariat. 2006. Background Brief on Operation of Hong Kong Disneyland. Council Business Division 1. Hong Kong SAR: Government of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Legislative Council Secretariat. 2009a. FCR(2009–10)39 Item for Finance Committee. Hong Kong SAR: Legislative Council, Finance Committee, Hong Kong Government.
   Google Scholar
• Legislative Council Secretariat. 2009b. Update on Proposed Expansion of Hong Kong Disneyland. Hong Kong SAR: Legislative Council, Hong Kong Government.
   Google Scholar
• Legislative Council Secretariat. 2012. Panel on Economic Development Meeting on 17 January 2012: Background Brief on Hong Kong Disneyland. Hong Kong SAR: Legislative Council, Hong Kong Government.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, W. 2006. “Disney Admits Talks over Shanghai Park.” The Standard, February 8.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, R. 2005. “Disney Seeks to Seal Blueprints.” South China Morning Post, October 23.
   Google Scholar
• Matusitz, J. 2011. “Disney’s Successful Adaptation in Hong Kong: A Glocalization Perspective.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 28: 667–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. 2000. “Comparing Accountability in the Public and Private Sectors.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 59 (1): 87–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, P., M. Van Der Burch, and G. Vindigni. 2002. “A Comparative Institutional Evaluation of Public-Private Partnerships in Dutch Urban Land-Use Revitalisation Projects.” Urban Studies 39 (10): 1865–1880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., and V. Murray. 2000. “Understanding the Process of Public-Private Partnerships.” In Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective, edited by S. P. Osborne, 70–83. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reckard, E. S. 1999. “Disney Discovering Its a Small World After All.” The Los Angeles Times, December 19.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, H., B. Gray, and K. Kim. 2009. “Performance of International Joint Ventures: What Factors Really Make a Difference and How?” Journal of Management 35 (3): 805–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saz-Carranza, A., and F. Longo. 2012. “Managing Competing Institutional Logics in Public–Private Joint Ventures.” Public Management Review 14 (3): 331–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman, M. 2006. “Disney’s Hong Kong Headache.” Time Magazine, May 8.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, S., and S. Zeidler. 2009. “Disney takes Stride into China.” The Globe and Mail, November 4.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2000. Joint Venture Public-Private Partnerships for Urban Environmental Services. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• van Ham, H., and J. Koppenjan. 2001. “Building Public-Private Partnerships: Assessing and Managing Risks in Port Development.” Public Management Review 4 (1): 593–616.
   Google Scholar
• Weihe, G. 2008. “Ordering Disorder – on the Perplexities of the Partnership Literature.” The Australian Journal of Public Administration 67 (4): 430–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettenhall, R. 2005. “The Public-Private Interface: Surveying the History.” In The Challenge of Public Private Partnerships: Learning From International Experience, edited by G. Hodge and C. Greve, 22–43. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, T., and W. Van Dooren. 2011. “Lost in Diffusion? How Collaborative Arrangements Lead to an Accountability Paradox.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 77 (3): 505–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, C. 2012. “Hong Kong Disneyland Turns a Corner.” The Wall Street Journal, November 29.
   Google Scholar