The Influence of Network Management and Complexity on Network Performance in Taiwan, Spain and the Netherlands

REFERENCES

• Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire. 2003. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A., and R. Torenvlied. 2011. “Managing the Environment: Effects of Network Ambition on Agency Performance.” Public Management Review 13 (1): 159–174. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.501618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., and D. W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.” Psychological Bulleting 103 (3): 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F., and B. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., and D. G. Bonett. 1980. “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures.” Psychological Bulletin 88 (3): 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E., J. Moon, and H. Choi, eds. 2011. Public Administration in East Asia: China, South Korea, Japan and Taiwan. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E., M. Sabharwal, C. Y. Wang, J. West, Y. Jing, C. Y. Jan, and W. Liu. 2013. “The Impact of Societal Culture on the Use of Performance Strategies in East Asia: Evidence from a Comparative Survey.” Public Management Review 15 (8): 1065–1089. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.816522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M., K. E. Portney, and K. Thomson. 1993. The Rebirth of Urban Democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, Y. 2011. “Taiwan’s Soft Power and the Future of Corss-Strati Relations: Can the Tail Wag the Dog?” In Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in East Asia, edited by J. Melissen and S. J. Lee, 117–137. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, C., and V. Lapuente. 2010. “Explaining Cross-Country Differences in Performance-Related Pay in the Public Sector.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (3): 577–600. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 2007. Networks and Democratic Ideals: Equality, Freedom, and Communication. In Theories of Democratic Network Governance, edited by E. Sørensen and J. Torfing, 262–273. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., B. Steijn, and E. H. Klijn. 2010. “Does Democratic Anchorage Matter?: An Inquiry into the Relation Between Democratic Anchorage and Outcome of Dutch Environmental Projects.” The American Review of Public Administration 40 (1): 46–63. doi:10.1177/0275074009332064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., and E. H. Klijn. 2009. “Project Versus Process Management in Public-Private Partnership: Relation Between Management Style and Outcomes.” International Public Management Journal 12 (3): 310–331. doi:10.1080/10967490903094350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Excellence in Public Administration for Competitiveness in EU Member States. Brussels: DG Enterprise and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Gage, R. W., and M. P. Mandell, eds. 1990. Strategies for Managing Intergovernmental Policies and Networks. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hanf, K., and F. W. Scharpf. 1978. Interorganizational Policy Making; Limits to Coordination and Central Control. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Herranz, J. 2008. “The Multisectoral Trilemma of Network Management.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, F. 1983. “National Cultures in Four Dimensions. A Research-Based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations.” International Studies of Management & Organization 13 (1–2): 46–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., and M. H. Bond. 1988. “The Confucius Connection: from Cultural Roots to Economic Growth.” Organizational Dynamics 16 (4): 5–21. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., and S. Vangen. 2005. Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., J. Edelenbos, M. Kort, and M. J. W. Van Twist. 2008. “Facing Management Choices: An Analysis of Managerial Choices in 18 Complex Environmental Public--Private Partnership Projects.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 74 (2): 251–282. doi:10.1177/0020852308089905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., J. Edelenbos, and B. Steijn. 2010a. “Trust in Governance Networks: Its Impacts on Outcomes.” Administration & Society 42 (2): 193–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., B. Steijn, and J. Edelenbos. 2010b. “The Impact of Network Management on Outcomes in Governance Networks.” Public Administration 88 (4): 1063–1082. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01826.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. F. M., and E. H. Klijn. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laumann, E. O., and D. Knoke. 1987. The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., and D. J. Whitney. 2001. “Accounting for Common Method Variance in Cross-Sectional Research Designs.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (1): 114–121. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntosh, R., and D. MacLean. 1999. “Conditioned Emergence: A Dissipative Structures Approach to Transformation.” Strategic Management Journal 20: 297–316. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:4<297::AID-SMJ25>3.0.CO;2-Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P. 2001. Getting Results through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management. Westport: Quarom Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marcussen, M., and J. Torfing. 2007. Democratic Governance in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., and R. Agranoff. 2011. “The Limitations of Public Management Networks.” Public Administration 89 (2): 265–284. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01917.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., and L. J. O’Toole. 2007. “Modeling Public Management: Empirical Analysis of the Management-Performance Nexus.” Public Management Review 9 (4): 503–527. doi:10.1080/14719030701726630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., and K. G. Provan. 2000. “Governing the Hollow State.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 359–380. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024273.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., and L. Bingham. 2009. The Collaborative Public Manager. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. 1997. “Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research Based Agendas in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 57 (1): 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., and K. Meier. 1999. “Modeling the Impact of Public Management: Implications of Structural Context.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9 (4): 505–526. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024421.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole Jr, L. J., and K. J. Meier. 2004. “Desperately Seeking Selznick: Cooptation and the Dark Side of Public Management in Networks.” Public Administration Review 64 (6): 681–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, M., and G. Peters. 2010. “Administrative Traditions in Comparative Perspective: Families, Groups and Hybrids.” In Tradition and Public Administration, edited by M. Painter and G. Peters, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 2: 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K., and P. Kenis. 2008. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2): 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., K. Huang, and H. B. Milward. 2009. “The Evolution of Structural Embeddedness and Organizational Social Outcomes in a Centrally Governed Health and Human Services Network.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (4): 873–893. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentz, J. O. 1987. “Generalizability Theory: A Comprehensive Method for Assessing and Improving the Dependability of Marketing Measures.” Journal of Marketing Research 24 (1): 19–28. doi:10.2307/3151750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, C., A. Langley, F. Beland, and J.-L. Denis. 2007. “Governance, Power, and Mandated Collaboration in an Interorganizational Network.” Administration & Society 39 (2): 150–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centred Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. K., E. H. Klijn, D. Kübler, E. Sørensen, and H. Sullivan. 2011. “Explaining the Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks; Evidence from Four European Countries.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 33 (1): 7–38. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806330100.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing, eds. 2007. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. R., M. W. Van Buuren, and L. M. Gerrits. 2009. Managing Complex Governance Systems. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 2001. “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29 (5): 670–690. doi:10.1177/0090591701029005004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar