For Better or worse: Organizational turnaround in New York City schools

References

• Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker. 2006. “Strategy Content and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Analysis.” Public Administration Review 66 (1): 52–63. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00555.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arogyaswamy, K., V. L. Barker, and Y.-A. Masoud. 1995. “Firm Turnarounds: An Integrative Two-Stage Model.” Journal of Management Studies 32 (4): 493–525. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1995.tb00786.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, V. L., and M. A. Mone. 1994. “Retrenchment: Cause of Turnaround or Consequence of Decline?” Strategic Management Journal 15 (5): 395–405. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeri, I. 2009. “The Measurement of Turnaround Management Strategies in Local Authorities.” Public Money and Management 29 (2): 131–136. doi:10.1080/09540960902768046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. 2003. “Sources of Public Service Improvement: A Critical Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (3): 367–394. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. 2006. “Strategies for Public Service Turnaround: Lessons from the Private Sector?” Administration & Society 38 (3): 365–388. doi:10.1177/0095399705286004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., and J. Dahya. 2002. “Executive Succession and the Performance of Public Organizations.” Public Administration 80 (1): 179–200. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., O. James, P. Johns, and N. Petrovsky. 2010. “Does Public Service Performance Affect Top Management Turnover?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (Supplement 2): i261–279. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., and K. J. Meier. 2009. “Environmental Change, Human Resources and Organizational Turnaround.” Journal of Management Studies 46 (5): 835–863. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00813.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A. 2005. “In the Eye of the Storm: Frontline Supervisors and Federal Agency Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (4): 505–527. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickley, J. A. 2003. “Empirical Research on CEO Turnover and Firm-Performance: A Discussion.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 36 (1–3): 227–233. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. S., R. I. Sutton, and D. A. Whetten. 1988. “Issues in Organizational Decline.” In Readings in Organizational Decline: Framework, Research and Prescriptions, edited by K. S. Cameron, R. I. Sutton, and D. A. Whetten, 3–19. Boston, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, S. D. 2002. “Turnarounds: A Stage Theory Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L’administration 19 (3): 249–266. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.2002.tb00271.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corstjens, M., and P. Doyle. 1989. “Evaluating Alternative Retail Repositioning Strategies.” Marketing Science 8 (2): 170–180. doi:10.1287/mksc.8.2.170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, W. J. 2000. “Monitoring School Performance for ‘Standards-Based Reform’.” Evaluation & Research in Education 14 (3–4): 237–253. doi:10.1080/09500790008666976.
   Google Scholar
• Favero, N., and K. J. Meier. 2013. “Evaluating Urban Public Schools: Parents, Teachers and State Assessments.” Public Administration Review 73 (3): 401–412. doi:10.1111/puar.12022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferejohn, J. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50 (1–3): 5–25. doi:10.1007/BF00124924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraga, L. R., B. A. Erlichson, and S. Lee. 1998. “Consensus Building and School Reform: The Role of the Courts in San Francisco.” In Changing Urban Education, edited by C. N. Stone, 66–92. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, E. P. H., and V. Karan. 1990. “Causes, Consequences, and Shareholder Wealth Effects of Management Turnover: A Review of the Empirical Evidence.” Financial Management 19 (2): 60–75. doi:10.2307/3665635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodsell, C. T. 1995. The Case for Bureaucracy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. 1985. “Turnaround Strategies.” In Handbook of Business Strategy, edited by W. D. Guth, 10–32. Boston, MA: Warren, Gorham, & Lamont.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., and M. E. Raymond. 2005. “Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24 (2): 297–327. doi:10.1002/pam.20091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, K., and W. T. Stanbury. 1990. “Privatization in British Columbia: Lessons from the Sale of Government Laboratories.” Canadian Public Administration/Administration Publique Du Canada 33 (2): 165–197. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.1990.tb01392.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwig, T., and D. Samuels. 2008. “Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 65–90. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrie, C. 1998. “A Mixed Record for Reconstitution Flashes a Yellow Light for Districts.” Education Week 17 (42): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, G. C. 2005. “The Effects of Managerial Succession on Organizational Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (4): 585–597. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, C. W. 1980. “Turnaround Strategies.” Journal of Business Strategy 1 (1): 19–31. doi:10.1108/eb038886.
   Google Scholar
• Jas, P., and C. Skelcher. 2005. “Performance Decline and Turnaround in Public Organizations: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” British Journal of Management 16 (3): 195–210. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00458.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juenke, E. G. 2005. “Management Tenure and Network Time: How Experience affects Bureaucratic Dynamics.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (1): 113–131. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D., and R. L. Kahn. 1978. The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-E. 2005. “Balancing Competing Accountability Requirements: Challenges in Performance Improvement of the Nonprofit Human Services Agency.” Public Performance and Management Review 29 (2): 145–163.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. A. 2011. High-stakes Reform: The Politics of Educational Accountability. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., and J. Bohte. 2003. “Not With a Bang, but a Whimper: Explaining Organizational Failures.” Administration & Society 35 (1): 104–121. doi:10.1177/0095399702250351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., and A. Hicklin. 2008. “Employee Turnover and Organizational Performance: Testing a Hypothesis from Classical Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 573–590. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., and L. J. O’Toole. 2002. “Public Management and Organizational Performance: The Effect of Managerial Quality.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 (4): 629–643. doi:10.1002/pam.10078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellahi, K., and A. Wilkinson. 2004. “Organizational Failure: A Critique of Recent Research and a Proposed Integrative Framework.” International Journal of Management Review 5 (1): 21–41. doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00095.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• New York City Department of Education. 2013. “Performance & Accountability.” http://schools.nyc.gov/Accountability/default.htm
   Google Scholar
• New York State Testing and Accountability Reporting Tool. 2012. “New York State Report Cards.” https://www.nystart.gov/publicweb/
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., and K. J. Meier. 1999. “Modeling the Impact of Public Management: Implications of Structural Context.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9 (4): 505–526. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024421.
   Google Scholar
• Paton, R., and J. Mordaunt. 2004. “What’s Different About Public and Non-Profit ’Turnaround’?” Public Money and Management 24 (4): 209–216. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2004.00422.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. A., and D. K. Robbins. 1994. “Retrenchment Remains the Foundation of Business Turnaround.” Strategic Management Journal 15 (5): 407–417. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell Jr., G. B., and G. D. Whitten. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391–414. doi:10.2307/2111378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, B. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Value. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., and B. Bozeman. 2000. “Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the a Priori.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 447–470. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024276.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. K., and B. Malen. 2003. “The Human Costs of Education Reform: The Case of School Reconstitution.” Educational Administration Quarterly 39 (5): 635–666. doi:10.1177/0013161X03257298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, A. 2014. “Organizational Turnaround and Educational Performance: The Impact of Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis Systems.” The American Review of Public Administration 44 (4): 440–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclar, E. D. 2000. You Don’t Always Get What You Pay For: The Economics of Privatization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C. 2003. “Issues and Challenges in Strategic Repositioning: The Case of Cable and Wireless.” Strategic Change 12 (5): 251–257. doi:10.1002/jsc.640.
   Google Scholar
• van Thiel, S., and F. L. Leeuw. 2002. “The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector.” Public Performance and Management Review 25 (3): 267–281. doi:10.2307/3381236.
   Google Scholar
• Walshe, K., G. Harvey, P. Hyde, and N. Pandit. 2004. “Organizational Failure and Turnaround: Lessons for Public Services from the For-Profit Sector.” Public Money and Management 24: 201–208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2004.00421.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E., and S. K. Pandey. 2010. “Transformational Leadership in the Public Sector: Does Structure Matter?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (1): 75–89. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., and S. K. Pandey. 2009. “How do Perceived Political Environment and Administrative Reform Affect Employee Commitment?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (2): 335–360. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar