Effects of amalgamations: evidence from Swiss municipalities

References

• Andrews, R., and G. Boyne. 2012. “Structural Change and Public Service Performance: The Impact of the Reorganization Process in English Local Government.” Public Administration 90 (2): 297–312. doi:10.1111/padm.2012.90.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1960. The Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aulich, C., G. Sansom, and P. McKinley. 2013. “A Fresh Look at Municipal Consolidation in Australia.” Local Government Studies 1–20. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.775124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avellaneda, C. N., and R. C. Gomes. 2015. “Is Small Beautiful? Testing the Direct and Nonlinear Effects of Size on Municipal Performance.” Public Administration Review 75 (1): 137–149. doi:10.1111/puar.12307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avenir Suisse, A., ed. 2012. “Kantonsmonitoring 4: Gemeindeautonomie Zwischen Illusion Und Realität. Zürich: Feldegg.
   Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, H. S., and R. P. Walsh. 2008. “Do People Vote with Their Feet? An Empirical Test of Tiebout’s Mechanism.” The American Economic Review 98 (3): 843–863. doi:10.1257/aer.98.3.843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bish, R. 1999. The Cost of Municipal Elected Officials in the Capital Region of British Columbia. Victoria: University of Victoria, Local Government Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bish, R. 2001. Local government amalgamations: discredited nineteenth-century ideals alive in the twenty-first, C.D. Howe Institute Commentary No. 150
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., and A. Heeager. 2011. “Denmark: Between Local Democracy and Implementing Agency of the Welfare State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, edited by J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, and A. Lidström, 221–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. 1995. “Population Size and Economies of Scale in Local Government.” Policy & Politics 23 (3): 213–222. doi:10.1332/030557395782453446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breunig, R., and Y. Rocaboy. 2008. “Per-Capita Public Expenditures and Population Size: A Non-Parametric Analysis using French Data.” Public Choice 136: 429–445. doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9304-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmann, G. 1980. Auswirkungen der Gebietsreform im Bereich der Ausgabenpolitik der Gemeinden – Empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel des Landes Niedersachsen. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Calciolari, S., D. Cristofoli, and L. Macciò. 2013. “Explaining the Reactions of Swiss Municipalities to the ‘Amalgamation Wave’: At the Crossroad of Institutional, Economic and Political Pressures.” Public Management Review 15 (4): 563–583. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.698852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callanan, M., R. Murphy, and A. Quinlivan. 2014. “The Risks of Intuition: Size, Costs and Economies of Scale in Local Government.” The Economic and Social Review 45 (3): 371–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, J. A., and C. E. Sachs. 1980. “The Impact of Government Size and Number of Administrative Units on the Quality of Public Services.” Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (1): 89–101. doi:10.2307/2392228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L. 1984. “A Theory of Local Autonomy.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 74 (2): 195–208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01448.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 1985. European Charter of Local Self-Government,Accessed 24.09.2015. www.conventions.coe.int.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe . 1997. Local Finance in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2001. Relationship between the Size of Local and Regional Authorities and Their Effectiveness and Economy of Their Action. Strasbourg: CDLR.
   Google Scholar
• Dafflon, B. 1998. “Suisse: Les Fusions de Communes dans le Canton de Fribourg. Analyse Socio-économique.” In Annuaire des Collectivités Locales, edited by Crédit Local de France et Direction Générale des Collectivités Locales. Paris: Grale.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., and E. R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damon, A. 2013. “Crossing Boundaries: Action Networks, Amalgamation and Inter-Community Trust in a Small Rural Shire.” Local Government Studies 39 (4): 463–487. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.693074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ceuninck, K., H. Reynaert, K. Steyvers, and T. Valcke. 2010. “Municipal Amalgamations in the Low Countries: Same Problems, Different Solutions.” Local Government Studies 36 (6): 803–822. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.522082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, M. S., and I. Sobis. 2013. “Consolidation in Local Government: An International Comparison of Arguments and Practices.” Administration 61 (3): 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Denters, B., M. Goldsmith, A. Ladner, P. E. Mouritzen, and L. E. Rose. 2014. Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., and J. Byrnes. 2007. “Is Bigger Better? Local Government Amalgamation and the South Australian Rising to the Challenge Inquiry.” Economic Analysis & Policy 37 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1016/S0313-5926(07)50001-9.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., J. Byrnes, and L. Crase. 2008. “Australian Local Government Amalgamation: A Conceptual Analysis. Population Size and Scale Economies in Municipal Service Provision.” Australasian Journal of Regional Studies 14 (2): 167–175.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., and L. Crase. 2004. “Is Bigger Local Government Better? An Evaluation of the Case for Australian Municipal Amalgamation Programs.” Urban Policy and Research 22 (3): 265–275. doi:10.1080/0811114042000269290.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., and A. Johnson. 2007. “An Analysis of the Joint Board or County Model as the Structural Basis for Effective Australian Local Governance.” The Australian Journal of Public Administration 66 (2): 198–209. doi:10.1111/ajpa.2007.66.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, J., and B. Dollery. 2014. “Would Bigger Councils Yield Scale Economies in the Greater Perth Metropolitan Region? A Critique of the Metropolitan Local Government Review for Perth Local Government.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 73 (1): 128–137. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, J., M. A. Kortt, and B. Dollery. 2013. “A Cautionary Tale: Council Amalgamation in Tasmania and the Deloitte Access Economics Report.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 72 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1111/aupa.2013.72.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, J., M. A. Kortt, and B. Dollery. 2014. “Did the Big Stick Work? An Empirical Assessment of Scale Economies and the Queensland Forced Amalgamation Program.” Local Government Studies. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.874341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dur, R., and K. Staal. 2008. “Local Public Good Provision, Municipal Consolidation, and National Transfers.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 38: 160–173. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Statistical Office (FSO). 2010. Finanzstatistik. Neuenburg: The Statistical Encyclopedia.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Statistical Office (FSO). 2014a. Bevölkerungsstatistik. Neuenburg: The Statistical Encyclopedia.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Statistical Office (FSO). (2014b) Nomenklaturen - Gemeindetypologie, Neuenburg, Accessed March 10, 2014. www.bfs.admin.ch
   Google Scholar
• Federal Statistical Office (FSO). 2016. Amtliches Gemeindeverzeichnis Der Schweiz. Neuenburg: The Statistical Encyclopedia.
   Google Scholar
• Fetz, U. (2009) Gemeindefusion unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Kantons Graubünden, Zürich: Zürcher Studien zum öffentlichen Recht.
   Google Scholar
• Folz, D. H. 2004. “Service Quality and Benchmarking the Performance of Municipal Services.” Public Administration Review 64 (2): 209–220. doi:10.1111/puar.2004.64.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, W. J., and H. J. Walberg. 1991. “School Size Characteristics, and Outcomes..” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 13 (2): 189–202. doi:10.3102/01623737013002189.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, W. F., and T. Gurley. 2006. “Will Consolidation Improve Sub-National Governments?.” World Bank Working Paper 3913: 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Friederich, U., D. Arn, and J. Wichtermann. 1998. Neubildung Politischer Gemeinden im Kanton Schaffhausen. Überlegungen zu einer Optimalen Gemeindegrösse und zu Vor- und Nachteilen von Gemeindefusionen. Bern: Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, H. R., M. Fourie, and J. F. Hay. 2001. “Are Institutional Combinations, Mergers or Amalgamation the Answer? An Investigation into Staff Perceptions.” South African Journal of Higher Education 15 (1): 100–108.
   Google Scholar
• Horak, M. 1998. The Power of Local Identity: C4LD and the Anti-Amalgamation Mobilization in Toronto. Research Paper No.195. Toronto: Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Houlberg, K. 2010. “Municipal Size, Economy, and Democracy.” In Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe, edited by P. Swianiewicz, 1–24. Budapest: Open Society Institute.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. 2010. “Larger and Larger? The Endless Search for Efficiency in the UK.” In Territorial Choice. The Politics of Boundaries and Borders, edited by H. Baldersheim and L. E. Rose, 101–117. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• John, P., and C. Copus. 2011. “The United Kingdom: Is There Really an Anglo Model?” In The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, edited by J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, and A. Lidström, 27–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, C. 2014. “Functioning and Impact of Incentives for Amalgamations in a Federal State: The Swiss Case.” International Journal of Public Administration 37 (10): 625–637. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.903265.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. 1995. “Size, Efficiency and Democracy: Consolidation, Fragmentation and Public Choice.” In Theories of Urban Politics, edited by D. Judge, G. Stoker and H. Wolman. 153–159. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, R. 2000. “Governance Restructuring in Los Angeles and Toronto: Amalgamation or Secession?.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (4): 758–781. doi:10.1111/ijur.2000.24.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersting, N., and A. Vetter. 2003. Reforming Local Government in Europe. Closing the Gap between Democracy and Efficiency. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. 1996. “A Model of Optimum Local Authority Size.” In Development in Local Government Finance, edited by G. Pola, G. France, and R. Levaggi, 55–76. Cheltenham, Brookfield: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler, D. 2003. “‘Metropolitan Governance’ oder: Die unendliche Geschichte der Institutionenbildung in Stadtregionen.” Information zur Raumentwicklung 8 (9): 535–541.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler, D., and H. Heinelt. 2005. “Metropolitan Governance, Democracy and the Dynamics of Place.” In Metropolitan Governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place, edited by H. Heinelt and D. Kübler. 8–28. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., and H. Wollmann. 2014. Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner, J., and D. Siegel. 2003. “Effect of Municipal Amalgamation in Ontario on Political Representation and Accessibility.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (5): 1035–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner, J., and D. Siegel. 2005. “Citizen Satisfaction with Municipal Amalgamations.” Canadian Public Administration 48 (1): 73–95. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2005.tb01599.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner, J., and D. Siegel. 2010. “Effect of Municipal Amalgamations in Ontario on Political Representation and Accessibility.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (5): 1035–1051.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., N. Keuffer, and H. Baldersheim. 2015. Local Autonomy Index for European countries (1990-2014). Release 1.0. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., and M. Bühlmann. 2007. Demokratie in den Gemeinden - Der Einfluss der Gemeindegrösse und anderer Faktoren auf die Qualität der lokalen Demokratie. Zürich: Rüegger.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., R. Steiner, K. Horber-Papazian, J. Fiechter, C. Jacot-Decombes, and C. Kaiser. 2013. Gemeindemonitoring 2009/2010 – Bericht zur fünften gesamtschweizerischen Gemeindeschreiberbefragung. Bern: KPM.
   Google Scholar
• Lago-Peñas, S., and J. Martinez-Vazquez. eds. 2013. The Challenge of Local Government Size. Theoretical Perspectives, International Experience and Policy Reform. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A. 2002. “Municipal Size and Democracy: A Critical Analysis of the Argument of Proximity Based on the Case of Denmark.” Scandinavian Political Studies 25 (4): 317–332. doi:10.1111/scps.2002.25.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D., and S. Serritzlew. 2011. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 238–258. doi:10.1017/S000305541100013X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, W. 1999. Schweizerische Demokratie. Institutionen, Prozesse, Perspektiven, Bern. Stuttgart: Wien: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Loughlin, J., F. Hendriks, and A. Lidström. eds. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lüchinger, S., and A. Stutzer. 2002. “Skalenerträge in Der Öffentlichen KernverwalTung. Eine Empirische Analyse Anhand Von Gemeindefusionen.” Swiss Political Science Review 1 (8): 27–50. doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.2002.tb00333.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mabuchi, M. 2001. Municipal Amalgamation in Japan. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2014. OECD Regional Outlook: Regions and Cities: Where Policies and People Meet. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., C. M. Tiebout, and R. Warren. 1961. “The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry.” The American Political Science Review 55 (4): 831–842. doi:10.2307/1952530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padovani, E., and E. Scorsone. 2009. “Comparing Local Government’s Performance Internationally: A Mission Impossible?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75 (2): 219–237. doi:10.1177/0020852309104173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E. C., and, M. J. Goldsmith. eds. 1987. Central and Local Government Relations. A Comparative Analysis of Western European Unitary States. Sage: London.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H. 2003. Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., J. Birchall, and K. Putman. 1998. Decentralising Public Service Management. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform – A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reingewertz, Y. 2012. “Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? Evidence from Municipalities in Israel.” Journal of Urban Economics 72: 240–251. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2012.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff, A. 1984. Die Entwicklung der Personalausgaben der Gemeinden Nordrhein Westfalens unter dem Einfluss der Kommunalen Gebietsreform. Thun, Frankfurt am Main: Harri Deutsch.
   Google Scholar
• Sancton, A. 1996. “Reducing Costs by Consolidating Municipalities: New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Ontario.” Canadian Public Administration 39: 267–89. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.1996.tb00133.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancton, A. 2000. Merger Mania. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schreyögg, G. 2008. Organisation – Grundlagen Moderner Organisationsgestaltung. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. 2009. “Toronto Ten Years after Amalgamation.” Canadian Journal of Regional Science XXXII (3): 483–494.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. B., and K. J. Meier. 1994. “Politics, Bureaucrats, and Schools.” Public Administration Review 54 (6): 551–558. doi:10.2307/976675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soguel, N., and J. Silberstein. 2015. “Welfare Loss with Municipal Amalgamations and the Willingness-to-Pay for the Municipality Name.” Local Government Studies. doi:10.1080/03003930.2015.1061507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, Z. 2012. “Post-Amalgamation Politics: How Does Consolidation Impact Community Decision-Making?.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research 21 (2): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, R. 2002. Interkommunale Zusammenarbeit und Gemeindezusammenschlüsse in der Schweiz, Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, R. 2003. “The Causes, Spread and Effects of Intermunicipal Cooperation and Municipal Mergers in Switzerland.” Public Management Review 5 (4): 551–571. doi:10.1080/1471903032000178581.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, R., and C. Kaiser. 2013. “Die Gemeindeverwaltung‘.” In Handbuch der öffentlichen Verwaltung in der Schweiz, edited by A. Ladner, J.-L. Chappelet, Y. Emery, P. Knoepfe, L. Mader, and N. Soguel, 149–166. Zürich: NZZ Libro.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, R., C. Kaiser, and G. T. Eythórsson. Forthcoming. “ A Comparative Analysis of Amalgamation Reforms in Selected European Countries‘.” In Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons, edited by S. Kuhlmann and G. Bouckaert. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, R., P. Reist, and D. Kettiger. 2010. Analyse der Urner Gemeinden und mögliche Handlungsoptionen. Bern: KPM.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” The Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424. doi:10.1086/257839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter, A., and N. Kersting. 2003. “Democracy versus Efficiency? Comparing Local Government Reforms across Europe.” In Reforming Local Government in Europe. Closing the Gap between Democracy and Efficiency, edited by N. Kersting and A. Vetter. 11–28. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vojnovic, I. 2000. “Municipal Consolidation, Regional Planning and Fiscal Accountability: The Recent Experience in Two Maritime Provinces.” Canadian Journal of Regional Science XXIII (1): 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H. 2010. “Territorial Local Level Reforms in the East German Regional States (Länder): Phases, Patterns, and Dynamics.” Local Government Studies 36 (2): 251–270. doi:10.1080/03003930903560612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar