Democracy, governmentality and transparency: participatory budgeting in action

References

• Aragonès, E., and S. Sánchez-Pagés. 2009. “A Theory of Participatory Democracy Based on the Real Case of Porto Alegre.” European Economic Review 53 (1): 56–72. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biondi, L., and I. Lapsley. 2014. “Accounting, Transparency and Governance: The Heritage Assets Problem.” Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 11 (2): 146–164. doi:10.1108/QRAM-04-2014-0035.
   Google Scholar
• Box, R., G. Marshall, B. Reed, and C. Reed. 2001. “New Public Management and Substantive Democracy.” Public Administration Review 61 (5): 608–619. doi:10.1111/puar.2001.61.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugué, Q., and R. Gallego. 2003. “A Democratic Public Administration?” Public Management Review 5 (3): 425–447. doi:10.1080/1471903032000146973.
   Google Scholar
• Carmela, B., E. Guarini, and I. Steccolini. 2016. “Italian Municipalities and the Fiscal Crisis: Four Strategies for Muddling Through.” Financial Accountability & Management 32 (3): 335–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. T. 2002. “Corporate Communication: The Challenge of Transparency.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal 7 (3): 162–168. doi:10.1108/13563280210436772.
   Google Scholar
• City of Edinburgh. 2013a. “£Eith Decides 2012-2013 Report.” Leith Neighbourhood Partnership, May.
   Google Scholar
• City of Edinburgh. 2013b. “Feedback on the Consultation on the Council’s Draft Proposals Budget for 2013/14.” Finance and Budget Committee, January 30.
   Google Scholar
• City of Edinburgh. 2014a. “Liberton Gilmerton Neighbourhood Parternship Community Grants – Youth Participatory Budgeting Event.” Liberton Gilmerton Neighbourhood Partnership, October 1.
   Google Scholar
• City of Edinburgh. 2014b. “£Eith Decides 2013-14: Evaluation.” Leith Neighbourhood Partnership, August 20.
   Google Scholar
• City of Edinburgh. 2014c. “Budget Proposals 2014/15: Overview of Feedback and Engagement.” Finance and Resource Committee, January 16.
   Google Scholar
• City of Edinburgh. 2015. “Budget Proposals: Overview of Feedback and Engagement.” February 3.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2002. A Tale of Three Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. 1999. “Design and Management of Participatory Public Policy Making.” Public Management Review 1 (4): 569–576. doi:10.1080/14719039900000027.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” The Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfrank, B. 2006. “Lessons from Latin American Experience in Participatory Budgeting.” Latin American Studies Association Meeting, San Juan, March.
   Google Scholar
• Häikiö, L. 2010. “The Diversity of Citizenship and Democracy in Local Public Management Reform.” Public Management Review 12 (3): 363–384. doi:10.1080/14719030903286649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, C., and O. Escobar. 2015. Participatory Budgeting in Scotland: An Overview of Strategic Design Choices and Principles for Effective Delivery. Glasgow: GCPH, WWS. October.
   Google Scholar
• Hollyer, J., B. P. Rosendorff, and J. R. Vreeland. 2011. “Democracy and Transparency.” The Journal of Politics 73 (4): 1191–1205. doi:10.1017/S0022381611000880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1995. “The New Public Management in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2–3): 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2001. “Transparency.” In Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought, edited by P. B. Clarke and J. Foweraker, 700–704. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2006. “Transparency in Historical Perspective.” In Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? edited by C. Hood and D. Heald. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2007. “What Happens When Transparency Meets Blame-Avoidance?” Public Management Review 9 (2): 191–210. doi:10.1080/14719030701340275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, K. 2016. “Analyzing Documents Through Fieldwork.” In Qualitative Research, edited by D. Silverman. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. 1996. Studying Organizational Symbolism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kondo, S. 2002. “Fostering Dialogue to Strengthen Good Governance.” In Public Sector Transparency and Accountability: Making it Happen, edited by Global Forum on Transparency, 7–12. Washington, DC: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., and F. Giordano. 2010. “Congestion Charging: A Tale of Two Cities. Accounting.” Auditing and Accountability Journal 23 (5): 671–698. doi:10.1108/09513571011054936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., P. Miller, and F. Panozzo. 2010. “Accounting for the City.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 23 (3): 305–324. doi:10.1108/09513571011034316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., and A. Ríos. 2015. “Making Sense of Government Budgeting: An Internal Transparency Perspective.” Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 12 (4): 377–394. doi:10.1108/QRAM-01-2015-0014.
   Google Scholar
• Leith NP Report. 2010. “Using a Participatory Budgeting Approach to Allocate the Community Grants Fund.” Leith NP, February 24.
   Google Scholar
• Leith NP Report. 2011. “£eith Decides Participatory Budgeting Pilot Project: Evaluation.” Leith Neighbourhood Partnership, May 3.
   Google Scholar
• Leith NP Report. 2012. “£Eith Decides 2011/12.” Leith Neighbourhood Partnership, June 6.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., and T. O’Leary. 2007. “Mediating Instruments and Making Markets: Capital Budgeting, Science and the Economy Accounting.” Organizations and Society 20 (2/3): 219–237.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. B. 1990. “On the Interrelations between Accounting and the State.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 15 (4): 315–338. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(90)90022-M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. B. 2001. “Governing by Numbers – Why Calculative Practices Matter.” Social Research 68 (2): 379–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. B., and N. Rose. 2008. Governing the Present. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Opedal, S., and H. Rommetvedt. 2010. “From Politics to Management – or More Politics?” Public Management Review 12 (2): 191–212. doi:10.1080/14719031003616115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, S., N. Grau, and A. Zaltsman. 2004. “Performance Evaluation, Public Management Improvement and Democratic Accountability.” Public Management Review 6 (2): 229–251. doi:10.1080/1471903042000189119.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2000. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, L. 2003. Using Documents in Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, A. 2015. “Have Your Say.” Edinburgh Evening News, January 28.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, A. 2016. “The Budget Challenge.” Edinburgh Evening News, January 15.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. C., A. Chhatre, and T. Lankina. 2008. “Institutional Choice and Recognition in the Formation and Consolidation of Local Democracy.” Conservation and Society 6 (1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sintomer, Y., C. Herzberg, and A. Röcke. 2008. “Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (1): 164–178. doi:10.1111/ijur.2008.32.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, B. 2000. Which Kind of Transparency? On the Need for Clarity in Monetary Policy-making. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 26. Frankfurt: ECB.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. C. 1997. “Local Agenda 21: The Renewal of Local Democracy?” Political Quarterly 68: 138–147. doi:10.1111/poqu.1997.68.issue-B.
   Google Scholar