False promises of co-production in neighbourhood regeneration: the case of Dutch community enterprises

References

• Aiken, M., B. Cairns, M. Taylor, and R. Moran. 2011. Community Organisations Controlling Assets: A Better Understanding. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2009. Engaging Public Sector Clients. from Service Delivery to Co-Production. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2016. “Co-Production, Interdependence and Publicness: Extending Public Service-Dominant Logic.” Public Management Review 18 (5): 673–691. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, N. 2012. “The Role, Organisation and Contribution of Community Enterprise to Urban Regeneration Policy in the UK.” Progress in Planning 77 (1): 1–35. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2011.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R., and M. Ram. 2006. “Fix or Fixation? the Contributions and Limitations of Entrepreneurship and Small Firms to Combating Social Exclusion.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 18 (1): 73–89. doi:10.1080/08985620500419566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Loeffler. 2012. “From Engagement to Co-Production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23 (4): 1119–1138. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2016. “Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions.” Public Administration Review 76 (3): 427–435. doi:10.1111/puar.12465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BZK Ministry of the Interior. 2013. De Doe-Democratie. Kabinetsnota Ter Stimulering Van Een Vitale Samenleving [The DIY Democracy. White Paper for Stimulating a Vital Society]. The Hague: Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• Daskalaki, M., D. Hjorth, and J. Mair. 2015. “Are Entrepreneurship, Communities, and Social Transformation Related?” Journal of Management Inquiry 24 (4): 419–423. doi:10.1177/1056492615579012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, M., M. Hurenkamp, and E. Tonkens. 2014. “Flexible Relations, Frail Contacts and Failing Demands: How Community Groups and Local Institutions Interact in Local Governance in the Netherlands.” Urban Studies 51 (16): 3365–3382. doi:10.1177/0042098013519832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., I. Van Meerkerk, and T. Schenk. 2016. “The Evolution of Community Self-Organization in Interaction with Government Institutions: Cross-Case Insights from Three Countries.” The American Review of Public Administration. doi:10.1177/0275074016651142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. A Map of Social Enterprises and Their Eco-Systems in Europe – Synthesis Report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A., and T. Brandsen. 2016. “Social Innovations As Messages: Democratic Experimentation In Local Welfare Systems.” In Social Innovations in the Urban Context, edited by T. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, and A. Zimmer, 161-180. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fledderus, J., T. Brandsen, and M. Honingh. 2014. “Restoring Trust through the Co-Production of Public Services: A Theoretical Elaboration.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 424–443. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.848920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. 2004. Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gofen, A. 2015. “Citizens’ Entrepreneurial Role in Public Service Provision.” Public Management Review 17 (3): 404–424. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.822533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2015. “Civil Society Enterprise and Local Development.” Planning Theory and Practice 16 (1): 11–27. doi:10.1080/14649357.2014.995212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, C., and L. Foss. 2015. “Case Sensitive? A Review of the Literature on the Use of Case Method in Entrepreneurship Research.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research 21 (3): 389–409. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-03-2014-0054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurenkamp, M., E. Tonkens, and J. W. Duyvendak. 2011. “Citizenship in the Netherlands: Locally Produced, Nationally Contested.” Citizenship Studies 15 (2): 205–225. doi:10.1080/13621025.2011.549716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, R., W. Doff, A. Romein, and M. Van Ham. 2015. Project Kennisontwikkeling Experiment Bewonersbedrijven – Eindrapportage [Project Knowledge Development Experiment Community Enterprises – Final Report]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R., and B. Bunker. 1996. “Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships.” In Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, edited by R. Kramer and T. Tyler, 114–139. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• LSA. 2015. Tussenrapportage Bewonersbedrijven [Interim Report Community Enterprises]. Utrecht: Landelijk Samenwerkingsverband Actieve Bewoners.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E., and K. Ward. 2012. “Policy Assemblages, Mobilities and Mutations: Toward a Multidisciplinary Conversation.” Political Studies Review 10 (3): 325–332. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederhand, J., V. Bekkers, and W. Voorberg. 2016. “Self-Organization and the Role of Government: How and Why Does Self-Organization Evolve in the Shadow of Hierarchy?” Public Management Review 18 (7): 1063–1084. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1066417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2003. Entrepreneurship and Local Economic Development: Programme and Policy Recommendations. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, P., Z. Radnor, and K. Strokosch. 2016. “Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment?” Public Management Review 18 (5): 639–653. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons. the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing The Great Divide: Co-Production, Synergy, And Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. 2003. Social Enterprise in Anytown. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, R. 2013. “Responsibilisation on Government’s Terms: New Welfare and Governance of Responsibility and Solidarity.” Social Policy and Society 12 (4): 583–595. doi:10.1017/S1474746413000018.
   Google Scholar
• Peredo, A., and J. Chrisman. 2006. “Toward a Theory of Community-Based Enterprise.” Academy of Management Review 31 (2): 309–328. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.20208683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2014. “Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 383–401. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2012. “Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe—Some Crucial Conceptual Issues.” In New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, edited by V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere, 13–34. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, A., Y. von Friedrichs, and J. Wincent. 2014. “Entrepreneurship In Society: A Review And Definition Of Community-based Entrepreneurship Research.” In Social Entrepreneurship. Leveraging Economic, Political, and Cultural Dimensions, edited by A. Lundström, C. Zhou, Y. von Friedrichs, and E. Sundin, 239-257. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A., S. Townsend, J. Morris, E. Rushbrooke, B. Greenhill, R. Whitehead, T. Matthews, and L. Golding. 2013. “Treat Me Right, Treat Me Equal: Using National Policy And Legislation To Create Positive Changes In Local Health Services For People With Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal Of Applied Research In Intellectual Disabilities 26 (1): 14–25. doi:10.1111/jar.12009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S. 2009. “Why Encouraging More People to Become Entrepreneurs Is Bad Public Policy.” Small Business Economics 33 (2): 141–149. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville, P., and G. McElwee. 2011. ““Situating Community Enterprise: A Theoretical Exploration’.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 23 (5–6): 317–330. doi:10.1080/08985626.2011.580161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 2003. Public Policy in the Community. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, S. 2010. “How Can Social Enterprise Address Disadvantage? Evidence from an Inner City Community.” Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing 22 (2): 89–107. doi:10.1080/10495141003601278.
   Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. 2015. “Longing for Wikitopia: The Study and Politics of Self-Organisation.” Urban Studies 52 (13): 2301–2312. doi:10.1177/0042098015577334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C., and T. Steen. 2014. “Why People Co-Produce: Analysing Citizens’ Perceptions on Co-Planning Engagement in Health Care Services.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 358–382. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk, I., B. Boonstra, and J. Edelenbos. 2013. “Self-Organization in Urban Regeneration: A Two-Case Comparative Research.” European Planning Studies 21 (10): 1630–1652. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varady, D., R. Kleinhans, and M. van Ham. 2015. “The Potential Of Community Entrepreneurship For Neighbourhood Revitalization In The United Kingdom And The United States.” Journal Of Enterprising Communities: People And Places In The Global Economy 9 (3): 253-276. doi:10.1108/JEC-01-2015-0009.
   Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., T. Brandsen, and V. Pestoff. 2012. “Co-Production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23 (4): 1083–1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., and J. Van Der Heijden. 2015. “The Promise of Democracy? Civic Enterprise, Localism and the Transformation of Democratic Capitalism.” In Reconsidering Localism, edited by S. Davoudi and A. Madanipour, 126–145. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Welter, F., L. Trettin, and U. Neumann. 2008. “Fostering Entrepreneurship in Distressed Urban Neighbourhoods.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 4 (2): 109–128. doi:10.1007/s11365-007-0069-5.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, M. 2001. “The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes.” Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar