Collaborative data networks for public service: governance, management, and performance

References

• Agranoff, R. 2007. “Managing within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations.” In Public Management and Change Series, edited by B. Radin. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V. 2007. “The Governance of Back-Office Integration.” Public Management Review 9 (3): 377–400. doi:10.1080/14719030701425761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B. 2008. “Legal Frameworks for Collaboration in Governance and Public Management.” In Big Ideas in Collaborative Public Management, edited by L. B. Bingham and R. O’leary, 247–269. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B. 2008. “Assesing Interorganizational Networks for Public Service Delivery: A Process-Perceived Effectiveness Framework.” Public Performance & Management Review 31 (3): 348–363. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576310302.
   Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K. 2007. “Crisis Management in Hindsight: Cognition, Communication, Coordination, and Control.” Public Administration Review Supplement to Volume 67: 189–197. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-s1.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S. 1996. “Interagency Information Sharing: Expected Benefits, Manageable Risks.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15 (3): 377–394. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199622)15:3<>1.0.CO;2-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S., A. M. Cresswell, and T. A. Pardo. 2009. “From “Need to Know” to “Need to Share”: Tangled Problems, Information Boundaries, and the Building of Public Sector Knowledge Networks.” Public Administration Review 69 (3): 392–402. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 22 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellberg, A.-S., and Å. Grönlund. 2013. “Conflicts in Implementing Interoperability: Re-Operationalizing Basic Values.” Government Information Quarterly 30 (2): 154–162. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, K. L., J. L. King, D. E. Dunkle, and J. P. Lane. 1989. Managing Information Systems: Change and Control in Organizational Computing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• MAPA. 2014. Memorandum of Agreement for Transportation Planning and Programming by and between the Metropolitan Area Planning Agency, Metro Transit, Iowa Department of Transportation and the Nebraska Department of Roads. Omaha, NE: MAPA.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. 2002. “Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It.” Public Administration Review 62 (5): 599–609. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. 2006. “Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It.” Public Administration Review 66 (s1): 33–43. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-s1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., and C. Silvia. 2010. “The Effect of Problem Severity, Managerial and Organizational Capacity, and Agency Structure on Intergovernmental Collaboration: Evidence from Local Emergency Management.” Public Administration Review 70 (2): 279–288. doi:10.1111/puar.2010.70.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., and L. J. O’toole 2001. “Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks: A Model with Evidence from U.S. Public Education.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 (3): 271–294. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. Michael Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. 2015. “Networks and Networking: The Public Administrative Agendas.” Public Administration Review 75 (3): 361–371. doi:10.1111/puar.12281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. H., and K. Rethemeyer. 2014. “The Politics of Connections: Assessing the Determinants of Social Structure in Policy Networks.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (2): 349-379. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus021.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K., and P. Kenis. 2008. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2): 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and R. H. Lemaire. 2012. “Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks: Using Research to Inform Scholarship and Practice.” Public Administration Review 72 (5): 638–648. doi:10.1111/puar.2012.72.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and H. B. Milward. 2001. “Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks.” Public Administration Review 61 (4): 414–423. doi:10.1111/puar.2001.61.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rethemeyer, K., and D. Hatmaker. 2008. “Network Management Reconsidered: An Inquiry into Management of Network Structures in Public Sector Service Provision.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 617–646. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rethemeyer, R. K. 2009. “Making Sense of Collaboration and Governance.” Public Performance & Management Review 32 (4): 565–573. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576320405.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. J., and B. Gray. 1991. “Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 (2): 139–162. doi:10.1177/0021886391272001.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, T.-M., and T. A. Maxwell. 2011. “Information-Sharing in Public Organizations: A Literature Review of Interpersonal, Intra-Organizational and Inter-Organizational Success Factors.” Government Information Quarterly 28: 164–175. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T.-M., L. Zheng, and T. Pardo. 2012. “The Boundaries of Information Sharing and Integration: A Case Study of Taiwan E-Government.” Government Information Quarterly 29: S51–S60. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar