1,285
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Legitimating change in the public sector: the introduction of (rational?) accounting practices in the United Kingdom, Italy and Austria

, , , , , & show all

References

  • Arellano-Gault, D., D. Demortain, C. Rouillard, and J. C. Thoenig. 2013. “Bringing Public Organization and Organizing Back In.” Organization Studies 34 (2): 145–167. doi:10.1177/0170840612473538.
  • Bitektine, A. 2011. “Toward a Theory of Social Judgments of Organizations: The Case of Legitimacy, Reputation, and Status.” Academy of Management Review 36 (1): 151–179. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0382.
  • Bitektine, A., and P. Haack. 2015. “The ‘Macro’ and the ‘Micro’ of Legitimacy: Toward a Multilevel Theory of the Legitimacy Process.” Academy of Management Review 40 (1): 49–75. doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0318.
  • Brown, A. D., S. Ainsworth, and D. Grant. 2012. “The Rhetoric of Institutional Change.” Organization Studies 33 (3): 297–321. doi:10.1177/0170840611435598.
  • Brown, T. L., and M. Potoski. 2003. “Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (4): 441–468. doi:10.1080/15309576.2005.11051842.
  • Carruthers, B. G., and W. Espeland. 1991. “Accounting for Rationality: Double-Entry Bookkeeping and the Rhetoric of Economic Rationality.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (1): 31–69. doi:10.1086/229739.
  • Carter, C., S. Crawford, and D. Muzio. 2015. “Scoping an Agenda for Future Research into the Professions.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 28 (8): 1198–1216. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-09-2015-2235.
  • Chan, J. 2003. “Government Accounting: An Assessment of Theory, Purposes and Standards.” Public Money & Management 23 (1): 13–20. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00336.
  • Christensen, M., and L. Parker. 2010. “Using Ideas to Advance Professions: Public Sector Accrual Accounting.” Financial Accountability & Management 26 (3): 246–266. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2010.00501.x.
  • Collins, H., and R. Evans. 2009. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Colyvas, J. A., and W. W. Powell. 2006. “Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science.” Research in Organizational Behavior 27 (1): 205–353. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27008-4.
  • Connolly, C., and N. Hyndman. 2006a. “The Actual Implementation of Accruals Accounting: Caveats from a Case within the UK Public Sector.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19 (2): 272–290. doi:10.1108/09513570610656123.
  • Connolly, C., and N. Hyndman. 2006b. The Impact of Resource Accounting and Budgeting in the Northern Ireland Public Sector. London: Certified Accountants Educational Trust.
  • Covaleski, M. A., and M. W. Dirsmith. 1988. “An Institutional Perspective on the Rise, Social Transformation and Fall of a University Budget Category.” Administrative Science Quarterly 33 (4): 562–587. doi:10.2307/2392644.
  • Covaleski, M. A., M. W. Dirsmith, and L. Rittenberg. 2003. “Jurisdictional Disputes over Professional Work: The Institutionalization of the Global Knowledge Expert.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (4): 323–355. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00029-6.
  • Creed, W. E. D., M. A. Scully, and J. R. Austin. 2002. “Clothes Make the Person: The Tailoring of Legitimating Accounts and the Social Construction of Identity.” Organization Science 13 (5): 475–496. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.5.475.7814.
  • Erkama, N., and E. Vaara. 2010. “Struggles over Legitimacy in Global Organizational Restructuring: A Rhetorical Perspective on Legitimation Strategies and Dynamics in a Shutdown Case.” Organization Studies 31 (7): 813–839. doi:10.1177/0170840609346924.
  • European Commission. 2012. Rural Development in the EU. Statistical and Economic Information Report 2012. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Ezzamel, M., N. Hyndman, Å. Johnsen, I. Lapsley, and J. Pallot. 2005. “Conflict and Rationality: Accounting in Northern Ireland’s Devolved Assembly.” Financial Accountability & Management 21 (1): 33–55. doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2005.00208.x.
  • Golant, B. D., and J. A. A. Sillince. 2007. “The Constitution of Organizational Legitimacy: A Narrative Perspective.” Organization Studies 28 (8): 1149–1167. doi:10.1177/0170840607075671.
  • Green, S. E., and Y. Li. 2011. “Rhetorical Institutionalism: Language, Agency, and Structure in Institutional Theory since Alvesson 1993.” Journal of Management Studies 48 (7): 1662–1697. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01022.x.
  • Green, S. E. 2004. “A Rhetorical Theory of Diffusion.” Academy of Management Review 29 (4): 653–669. doi:10.5465/AMR.2004.14497653.
  • Hammerschmid, G., and R. E. Meyer. 2005. “Public Management Dynamics in a Federal Legalistic Rechtsstaat System. Results from an Executive Survey in Austria.” International Journal for Public Sector Management 18 (7): 629–640. doi:10.1108/09513550510624086.
  • Herepath, A., and M. Kitchener. 2016. “When Small Bandages Fail: The Field-Level Repair of Severe and Protracted Institutional Breaches.” Organization Studies 37 (8): 1113–1139. doi:10.1177/0170840615622065.
  • Hood, C. 1995. “The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2–3): 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.
  • Hood, C., and R. Dixon. 2016. “Not What It Said on the Tin? Reflections on Three Decades of UK Public Management Reform.” Financial Accountability & Management 32 (4): 409–428. doi:10.1111/faam.12095.
  • Hood, C., and G. Peters. 2004. “The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (3): 267–282. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh019.
  • Humphrey, C. 2005. “The Questionable Nature of ‘Third Hand’ Public Sector Accounting Solutions: A Case for Change?” European Accounting Review 14 (3): 475–485. doi:10.1080/09638180500256061.
  • Hurrelmann, A., A. Gora, and A. Wagner. 2013. “The Legitimation of the European Union in the News Media: Three Treaty Reform Debates.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (4): 515–534. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.726478.
  • Hyndman, N., and I. Lapsley. 2016. ““New Public Management: The Story Continues.”.” Financial Accountability & Management 32 (4): 385–408. doi:10.1111/faam.12100.
  • Hyndman, N., and M. Liguori. 2016. “Justifying Accounting Change through Global Discourses and Legitimation Strategies. The Case of the UK Central Government.” Accounting and Business Research 46 (4): 390–421. doi:10.1080/00014788.2015.1124256.
  • Hyndman, N., M. Liguori, R. E. Meyer, T. Polzer, and J. Seiwald. 2014. “The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms. A Comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian Experiences.” Critical Perspective on Accounting 25 (4/5): 388–408. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2013.05.008.
  • Joutsenvirta, M., and E. Vaara. 2015. “Legitimacy Struggles and Political Corporate Social Responsibility in International Settings: A Comparative Discursive Analysis of a Contested Investment in Latin America.” Organization Studies 36 (6): 741–777. doi:10.1177/0170840615571958.
  • Keevers, L., L. Treleaven, C. Sykes, and M. Darcy. 2012. “Made to Measure: Taming Practices with Results-Based Accountability.” Organization Studies 33 (1): 97–120. doi:10.1177/0170840611430597.
  • Kickert, W. J. M. 2008. Distinctiveness in the Study of Public Management in Europe. The Study of Public Management in Europe and the US. London: Routledge.
  • Lapsley, I. 2009. “New Public Management: The Cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit?” Abacus 45 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00275.x.
  • Lefsrud, L. M., and R. E. Meyer. 2012. “Science or Science Fiction? Professionals’ Discursive Construction of Climate Change.” Organization Studies 33 (11): 1477–1506. doi:10.1177/0170840612463317.
  • Liguori, M., and I. Steccolini. 2012. “Accounting Change: Explaining the Outcomes, Interpreting the Process.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 25 (1): 27–70. doi:10.1108/09513571211191743.
  • Likierman, A. 2003. “Planning and Controlling UK Public Expenditure on a Resource Basis.” Public Money & Management 23 (1): 45–50. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00340.
  • Meyer, R. E. 2014. “‘Re-Localization’ as Micro-Mobilization of Consent and Legitimacy.” In Global Themes and Local Variations in Organization and Management: Perspectives on Glocalization, edited by G. S. Drori, M. A. Höllerer, and P. Walgenbach, 79–89. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Meyer, R. E., and M. Höllerer. 2010. “Meaning Structures in A Contested Issue Field: A Topographic Map of Shareholder Value in Austria.” Academy of Management Journal 53 (6): 1241–1262. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.57317829.
  • Miller, P. 2001. “Governing by Numbers: Why Calculative Practices Matter.” Social Research 68 (2): 379–396.
  • Newman, J. 2001. Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage.
  • Nor-Aziah, A. K., and R. W. Scapens. 2007. “Corporatisation and Accounting Change. The Role of Accounting and Accountants in a Malaysian Public Utility.” Management Accounting Research 18 (2): 209–247. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2007.03.003.
  • Olson, O., J. Guthrie, and C. Humphrey. 1998. “International Experiences with ‘New’ Public Financial Management (NPFM) Reforms: New World? Small World? Better World?” In Global Warning: Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management, edited by O. Olson, J. Guthrie, and C. Humphrey, 17–48. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
  • Ongaro, E. 2009. Public Management Reform and Modernisation. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
  • Ongaro, E. 2011. “The Role of Politics and Institutions in the Italian Administrative Reform Trajectory.” Public Administration 89 (3): 738–755. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01885.x.
  • Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pollitt, C. 2001. “Clarifying Convergence. Striking Similarities and Durable Differences in Public Management Reform.” Public Management Review 3 (4): 471–492. doi:10.1080/14616670110071847.
  • Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers). 2014. Collection of Information Related to the Potential Impact, Including Costs, of Implementing Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector and Technical Analysis of the Suitability of Individual IPSAS Standards. Brussels: PricewaterhouseCoopers. Accessed January 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/1015035/4261806/EPSAS-study-final-PwC-report.pdf.
  • Sahlin, K., and L. Wedlin. 2008. “Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, 218–242. London et al.: Sage.
  • Scott, M. B., and S. M. Lyman. 1970. “Accounts, Deviance, and Social Order.” In Deviance and Respectability. The Social Construction of Moral Meanings, edited by J. D. Douglas, 89–119. New York: Basic Books.
  • Seiwald, J., R. E. Meyer, G. Hammerschmid, I. Egger-Peitler, and M. A. Höllerer. 2013. Neue Wege des Haushaltsmanagements. Internationale Erfahrungen, Herausforderungen und Trends. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
  • Speklé, R., and F. H. M. Verbeeten. 2014. “The Use of Performance Measurement Systems in the Public Sector: Effects on Performance.” Management Accounting Research 25 (2): 131–146. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004.
  • Suddaby, R., and R. Greenwood. 2005. “Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy.” Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (1): 35–67. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35.
  • Tost, L. P. 2011. “An Integrative Model of Legitimacy Judgments.” Academy of Management Review 36 (4): 686–710. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0227.
  • Townley, B., D. J. Cooper, and L. Oakes. 2003. “Performance Measures and the Rationalization of Organizations.” Organization Studies 24 (7): 1045–1071. doi:10.1177/01708406030247003.
  • Trochim, W., and J. P. Donnelly. 2006. The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog.
  • Vaara, E., and J. Tienari. 2002. “Justification, Legitimization and Naturalization of Mergers and Acquisitions: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Media Texts.” Organization 9 (2): 275–303. doi:10.1177/1350508402009002912.
  • Vaara, E., and J. Tienari. 2008. “A Discursive Perspective on Legitimation Strategies in Multinational Corporations.” Academy of Management Review 33 (4): 985–993. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.34422019.
  • Vaara, E., J. Tienari, and J. Laurila. 2006. “Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring.” Organization Studies 27 (6): 789–810. doi:10.1177/0170840606061071.
  • van Leeuwen, T., and R. Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigration Control. A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118. doi:10.1177/1461445699001001005.
  • Vogel, R. 2012. “Framing and Counter-Framing New Public Management: The Case of Germany.” Public Administration 90 (2): 370–392. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01981.x.
  • Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.