9,070
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Conceptualizing dysfunctional consequences of performance measurement in the public sector

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Arnaboldi, M., I. Lapsley, and I. Steccolini. 2015. “Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge.” Financial Accountability & Management 31 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1111/faam.12049.
  • Bevan, G., and C. Hood. 2006. “What’s Measured Is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System.” Public Administration 84 (3): 517–538. doi:10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-3.
  • Bouckaert, G., and B. G. Peters. 2002. “Performance Measurement and Management: The Achilles’ Heel in Administrative Modernization.” Public Performance & Management Review 25 (4): 359–362.
  • Bouckaert, G., and W. Balk. 1991. “Public Productivity Measurement: Diseases and Cures.” Public Productivity & Management Review 15: 229–235. doi:10.2307/3380763.
  • Boyne, G. A. 2002. “Theme: Local Government: Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Frameworks in England and Wales.” Public Money and Management 22 (2): 17–24. doi:10.1111/pmam.2002.22.issue-2.
  • Broadbent, J., and J. Guthrie. 2008. “Public Sector to Public Services: 20 Years of “Contextual” Accounting Research.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21 (2): 129–169. doi:10.1108/09513570810854383.
  • Chang, L. C. 2006. “Managerial Responses to Externally Imposed Performance Measurement in the NHS: An Institutional Theory Perspective.” Financial Accountability & Management 22 (1): 63–85. doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00393.x.
  • Chang, L. C. 2015. “Accountability, Rhetoric, and Political Interests: Twists and Turns of NHS Performance Measurements.” Financial Accountability & Management 31 (1): 41–68. doi:10.1111/faam.12045.
  • Chenhall, R. H. 2003. “Management Control Systems Design within Its Organizational Context: Findings from Contingency-Based Research and Directions for the Future.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (2–3): 127–168. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7.
  • Conrad, L., and P. G. Uslu. 2011. “Investigation of the Impact of ‘Payment by Results’ on Performance Measurement and Management in NHS Trusts.” Management Accounting Research 22 (1): 46–55. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2010.10.007.
  • Cuganesan, S., J. Guthrie, and V. Vranic. 2014. “The Riskiness of Public Sector Performance Measurement: A Review and Research Agenda.” Financial Accountability & Management 30 (3): 279–302. doi:10.1111/faam.12037.
  • Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson. 1997. “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management.” Academy of Management Review 22 (1): 20–47. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258.
  • De Bruijn, H. 2002. “Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Strategies to Cope with the Risks of Performance Measurement.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 15 (7): 578–594. doi:10.1108/09513550210448607.
  • De Bruijn, H., and G. J. Van Helden. 2006. “A Plea for Dialogue Driven Performance-Based Management Systems: Evidence from the Dutch Public Sector.” Financial Accountability & Management 22 (4): 405–423. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2006.00432.x.
  • Diefenbach, T. 2009. “New Public Management in Public Sector Organizations: The Dark Sides of Managerialistic ‘Enlightenment’.” Public Administration 87 (4): 892–909. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01766.x.
  • Drazin, R., and A. H. Van de Ven. 1985. “Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory.” Administrative Science Quarterly 30: 514–539. doi:10.2307/2392695.
  • Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism, the Third Logic: On the Practice of Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gerdin, J., and J. Greve. 2004. “Forms of Contingency Fit in Management Accounting Research—A Critical Review.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 (3–4): 303–326. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00096-X.
  • Gibbons, R. 1998. “Incentives in Organizations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (4): 115–132. doi:10.1257/jep.12.4.115.
  • Grabner, I., and F. Moers. 2013. “Management Control as a System or a Package? Conceptual and Empirical Issues.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 38 (6–7): 407–419. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2013.09.002.
  • Greener, I. 2005. “Health Management as Strategic Behaviour: Managing Medics and Performance in the NHS.” Public Management Review 7 (1): 95–110. doi:10.1080/1471903042000339437.
  • Greenwood, E. 1957. “Attributes of a Profession.” Social Work 3 (3): 47–55.
  • Hartmann, F. G. 2000. “The Appropriateness of RAPM: Toward the Further Development of Theory.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 25 (4–5): 451–482.
  • Hofstede, G. 1981. “Management Control of Public and Not-For-Profit Activities.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 6 (3): 193–211. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(81)90026-X.
  • Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1111/padm.1991.69.issue-1.
  • Hood, C. 1996. “Beyond “Progressivism”: A New “Global Paradigm” in Public Management?” International Journal of Public Administration 19 (2): 151–177. doi:10.1080/01900699608525090.
  • Hood, C., and M. W. Jackson. 1991. Administrative Argument. Vol. 5. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
  • Horngren, C. T. 2004. “Management Accounting: Some Comments.” Journal of Management Accounting Research 16 (1): 207–211. doi:10.2308/jmar.2004.16.1.207.
  • Jakobsen, M. L., M. Baekgaard, D. P. Moynihan, and N. van Loon. 2018. “Making Sense of Performance Regimes: Rebalancing External Accountability and Internal Learning.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1 (2): 127–141. doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvx001.
  • Jaworski, B. J., and S. M. Young. 1992. “Dysfunctional Behavior and Management Control: An Empirical Study of Marketing Managers.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 (1): 17–35. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(92)90034-P.
  • Johansson, T., and S. Siverbo. 2014. “The Appropriateness of Tight Budget Control in Public Sector Organizations Facing Budget Turbulence.” Management Accounting Research 25 (4): 271–283. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2014.04.001.
  • Johansson, T., and S. Siverbo. 2018. “The Relationship between Supplier Control and Competition in Public Sector Outsourcing.” Financial Accountability & Management 34: 268–287. doi:10.1111/faam.12153.
  • Johnsen, Å. 2005. “What Does 25 Years of Experience Tell Us about the State of Performance Measurement in Public Policy and Management?” Public Money and Management 25 (1): 9–17.
  • Kastberg, G., and S. Siverbo. 2007. “Activity-Based Financing of Health Care––Experiences from Sweden.” The International Journal of Health Planning and Management 22 (1): 25–44.
  • Kastberg, G., and S. Siverbo. 2016. “The Role of Management Accounting and Control in Making Professional Organizations Horizontal.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 29 (3): 428–451. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-03-2014-1632.
  • Kelman, S., and J. N. Friedman. 2009. “Performance Improvement and Performance Dysfunction: An Empirical Examination of Distortionary Impacts of the Emergency Room Wait-Time Target in the English National Health Service.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (4): 917–946. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun028.
  • Kennedy, F. A., and S. K. Widener. 2008. “A Control Framework: Insights from Evidence on Lean Accounting.” Management Accounting Research 19 (4): 301–323. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2008.01.001.
  • Kerpershoek, E., M. Groenleer, and H. de Bruijn. 2016. “Unintended Responses to Performance Management in Dutch Hospital Care: Bringing Together the Managerial and Professional Perspectives.” Public Management Review 18 (3): 417–436. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.985248.
  • Lapsley, I. 2008. “The NPM Agenda: Back to the Future.” Financial Accountability & Management 24 (1): 77–96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00444.x.
  • Lapsley, I., and P. Skærbæk. 2012. “Why the Public Sector Matters.” Financial Accountability & Management 28 (4): 355–358. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00550.x.
  • Liguori, M., M. Sicilia, and I. Steccolini. 2012. “Some like It Non-Financial… Politicians’ and Managers’ Views on the Importance of Performance Information.” Public Management Review 14 (7): 903–922. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.650054.
  • Macintosh, N. B., and R. L. Daft. 1987. “Management Control Systems and Departmental Interdependencies: An Empirical Study.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 (1): 49–61. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(87)90015-8.
  • Malmi, T., and D. A. Brown. 2008. “Management Control Systems as a package—Opportunities, Challenges and Research Directions.” Management Accounting Research 19 (4): 287–300. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003.
  • Merchant, K., and W. Van der Stede. 2017. Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1995. “Complementarities and Fit Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change in Manufacturing.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 19 (2–3): 179–208. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)00382-F.
  • Otley, D. 2003. “Management Control and Performance Management: Whence and Whither?” British Accounting Review 35: 309–326. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2003.08.002.
  • Otley, D. T. 1980. “The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting: Achievement and Prognosis.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 5: 413–428. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(80)90040-9.
  • Pache, A. C., and F. Santos. 2010. “When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands.” Academy of Management Review 35 (3): 455–476.
  • Pollanen, R., A. Abdel-Maksoud, S. Elbanna, and H. Mahama. 2017. “Relationships between Strategic Performance Measures, Strategic Decision-Making, and Organizational Performance: Empirical Evidence from Canadian Public Organizations.” Public Management Review 19 (5): 725–746. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1203013.
  • Power, M. K. 2004. The Risk Management of Everything. London: Demos.
  • Rautiainen, A., and M. Järvenpää. 2012. “Institutional Logics and Responses to Performance Measurement Systems.” Financial Accountability & Management 28 (2): 164–188. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00541.x.
  • Reay, T., and C. R. Hinings. 2009. “Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics.” Organization Studies 30 (6): 629–652. doi:10.1177/0170840609104803.
  • Saz-Carranza, A., and F. Longo. 2012. “Managing Competing Institutional Logics in Public–Private Joint Ventures.” Public Management Review 14 (3): 331–357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.637407.
  • Smith, P. 1995. “On the Unintended Consequences of Publishing Performance Data in the Public Sector.” International Journal of Public Administration 18: 277–310. doi:10.1080/01900699508525011.
  • Thornton, P. H. 2004. Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Thornton, P. H., and W. Ocasio. 2008. “Institutional Logics.” In Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, and R. Suddaby, 99–130. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Vaivio, J. 2007. “Qualitative Research on Management Accounting: Achievements and Potential.” In Issues in Management Accounting, edited by T. Hopper, D. Northcott, and R. W. Scapens, 425–443. Hertfordshire, UK: Prentice-Hall.
  • Van Den Broek, J., P. Boselie, and J. Paauwe. 2014. “Multiple Institutional Logics in Health Care: ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’.” Public Management Review 16 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.770059.
  • van Helden, J., G., Å. Johnsen, and J. Vakkuri. 2008. “Distinctive Research Patterns on Public Sector Performance Measurement of Public Administration and Accounting Disciplines.” Public Management Review 10 (5): 641–651. doi:10.1080/14719030802264366.
  • Van Hengel, H., T. Budding, and T. Groot. 2014. “Loosely Coupled Results Control in Dutch Municipalities.” Financial Accountability & Management 30 (1): 49–74. doi:10.1111/faam.12027.