Organizational complexity and participatory innovation: participatory budgeting in local government

References

• Aiken, M., and J. Hage. 1971. “The Organic Organization and Innovation.” Sociology 5 (1): 63–82. doi:10.1177/003803857100500105.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, M., S. B. Bacharach, and J. L. French. 1980. “Organizational Structure, Work Process, and Proposal Making in Administrative Bureaucracies.” The Academy of Management Journal 23 (4): 631–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and G. Boyne. 2011. “Corporate Capacity and Public Service Performance.” Public Administration 89 (3): 894–908. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01891.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audia, P. G., and H. R. Greve. 2006. “Less Likely to Fail: Low Performance, Firm Size, and Factory Expansion in the Shipbuilding Industry.” Management Science 52 (1): 83–94. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldridge, J. V., and R. A. Burnham. 1975. “Organizational Innovation: Individual, Organizational, and Environmental Impacts.” Administrative Science Quarterly 20 (2): 165–176. doi:10.2307/2391692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V. J. J. M., J. Edelenbos, and A. J. Steijn, eds. 2011. Governance and Public Management Series. Innovation in the Public Sector: Linking Capacity and Leadership. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, J. R., and W. McKinley. 1979. “Ideas, Complexity, and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (2): 200–219. doi:10.2307/2392494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, M. P. 1970. “A Formal Theory of Differentiation in Organizations.” American Sociological Review 35 (2): 201–218. doi:10.2307/2093199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogumil, J. 2018. “Kommunale Selbstverwaltung - Gemeinde/Kreise.” In Handbuch Staat, edited by R. Voigt, 765–774. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• bpb, and SKEW. 2015. 8. Statusbericht Bürgerhaushalte in Deutschland. http://www.buergerhaushalt.org/sites/default/files/downloads/8._Statusbericht_Buergerhaushalte_in_Deutschland_Juni_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T., and G. M. Stalker. 1961. The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cabannes, Y. 2004. “Participatory Budgeting: A Significant Contribution to Participatory Democracy.” Environment and Urbanization 16 (1): 27–46. doi:10.1630/095624704323026133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camisón-Zornoza, C., R. Lapiedra-Alcamí, M. Segarra-Ciprés, and M. Boronat-Navarro. 2004. “A Meta-Analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size.” Organization Studies 25 (3): 331–361. doi:10.1177/0170840604040039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West, eds. 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., P. ‘t Hart, and J. Torfing. 2017. “Public Value Creation through Collaborative Innovation.” Public Management Review 19 (5): 655–669. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. 1991. “Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators.” Academy of Management Journal 34 (3): 555–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. 1992. “Organizational Size and Innovation.” Organization Studies 13 (3): 375–402. doi:10.1177/017084069201300304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. 1996. “Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models.” Management Science 42 (5): 693–716. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.5.693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., and M. Schneider. 2009. “Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (3): 495–522. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2016. “Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” Public Administration 94 (1): 146–166. doi:10.1111/padm.2016.94.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, M. A., and D. B. Audretsch. 2017. “Conditions for Innovation in Public Sector Organizations.” Research Policy 46 (9): 1681–1691. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P. 2010. “New Worlds in Political Science.” Political Studies 58 (2): 239–265. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00834.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebdon, C., and A. L. Franklin. 2006. “Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory.” Public Administration Review 66 (3): 437–447. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00600.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissel, B. 2009. “How to Improve the Quality of Democracy? Experiences with Participatory Innovations at the Local Level in Germany.” German Politics and Society 27 (4): 51–71. doi:10.3167/gps.2009.270403.
   Google Scholar
• George, B., and S. K. Pandey. 2017. “We Know the Yin—But Where Is the Yang? Toward a Balanced Approach on Common Source Bias in Public Administration Scholarship.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 37 (2): 245–270. doi:10.1177/0734371X17698189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., G. Robert, F. Macfarlane, P. Bate, and O. Kyriakidou. 2004. “Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations.” The Milbank Quarterly 82 (4): 581–629. doi:10.1111/milq.2004.82.issue-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson, and R. D. Ireland. 1990. “Mergers and Acquisitions and Managerial Commitment to Innovation in M-Form Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 11: 29–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. 2015. “Citizen Participation in Budgeting: A Trade-Off between Knowledge and Inclusiveness?” Public Administration Review 75 (4): 572–582. doi:10.1111/puar.12377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., and J. Stansbury. 2004. “Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?” Public Administration Review 64 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. L. F., and C. Thrane. 2016. “Public Innovation and Organizational Structure - Searching (In Vain) for the Optimal Design.” In Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance, edited by J. Torfing and P. Triantafillou, 217–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. P., F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda. 2006. “Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators.” Management Science 52 (11): 1661–1674. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, B. S. 2013. “Raise Taxes Cut Services, or Lay off Staff: Citizens in the Fiscal Retrenchment Process”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (4): 923–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. R. 2007. Organizational Theory, Design, and Change. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kimberly, J. R. 1976. “Organizational Size and the Structuralist Perspective: A Review, Critique, and Proposal.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (4): 571–597. doi:10.2307/2391717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe, H. W. 2017. “Municipalities’ Willingness to Adopt Process Innovations: Evidence for Higher Cost-Efficiency.” Local Government Studies 43 (5): 707–730. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1324428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, S. F., and M. Braun. 2009. “Managerial Risk, Innovation, and Organizational Decline.” Journal of Management 35 (2): 258–281. doi:10.1177/0149206308321549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. D., R. W. Johnson, and P. G. Joyce. 2013. Public Budgeting Systems. 9th ed. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, W., S. Latham, and M. Braun. 2014. “Organizational Decline and Innovation: Turnarounds and Downward Spirals.” Academy of Management Review 39 (1): 88–110. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehr Demokratie e.V. 2017. Positionen Der Parteien. https://www.mehr-demokratie.de/themen/volksabstimmungen/positionen-der-parteien
   Google Scholar
• Michels, A., and L. De Graaf. 2010. “Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policy Making and Democracy.” Local Government Studies 36 (4): 477–491. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.494101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J., and S. Bretschneiber. 2002. “Does the Perception of Red Tape Constrain IT Innovativeness in Organizations? Unexpected Results from a Simultaneous Equation Model and Implications.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12 (2): 273–292. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalbandian, J. 1991. Professionalism in Local Government: Transformations in the Roles, Responsibilities, and Values of City Managers. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Naschold, F. 1996. New Frontiers in Public Sector Management: Trends and Issues in State and Local Government in Europe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. 2014. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Nord, W. R., and S. Tucker. 1987. Implementing Routine and Radical Innovations. The Issues in Organization and Management Series. Lexington: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Plume.
   Google Scholar
• Protasel, G. J. 1988. “Abandonments of the Council-Manager Plan: A New Institutionalist Perspective.” Public Administration Review 48 (4): 807–812. doi:10.2307/975605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. C. N., and E. Vigoda-Gadot. 2015. Global Dimensions of Public Administration and Governance: A Comparative Voyage. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Röcke, A. 2014. Framing Citizen Participation: Participatory Budgeting in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rossmann, D., and E. A. Shanahan. 2011. “Defining and Achieving Normative Democratic Values in Participatory Budgeting Processes.” Public Administration Review 72 (1): 56–66. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02480.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, A., and J. Van Der Voet. 2018. “Shifting Administrative Intensity and Employee Composition: Cutback Management in Education.” The American Review of Public Administration. doi:10.1177/0275074018794701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salge, T. O. 2011. “A Behavioral Model of Innovative Search: Evidence from Public Hospital Services.” Research Policy 41 (4): 720–733. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salge, T. O., and A. Vera. 2012. “Benefiting from Public Sector Innovation. The Moderating Role of Customer and Learning Orientation.” Public Administrative Review 72 (4): 550–560. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02529.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. H., and S. Busse. 2018. “Participatory Budgeting in Germany–A Review of Empirical Findings.” International Journal of Public Administration 42 (3): 259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singla, A., J. M. Stritch, and M. K. Feeney. 2018. “Constrained or Creative? Changes in Financial Condition and Entrepreneurial Orientation in Public Organizations.” Public Administration 96 (4): 769–786. doi:10.1111/padm.12540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spada, P. 2014. “The Diffusion of Participatory Governance Innovations: A Panel Data Analysis of the Adoption and Survival of Participatory Budgeting in Brazil.” Latin American Studies Association 32: 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2018. “Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector: The Argument.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., and P. Triantafillou, eds. 2016. Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., V. J. J. M. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. 2006. “Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government.” Public Administration 84 (2): 311–335. doi:10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. 2008. “An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a Configuration Framework.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 591–615. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. 2014. “Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A Review and Extension.” Public Management Review 16 (1): 21–44. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.771698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegrich, K. 2019. “The Blind Spots Of Collaborative Innovation.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynen, J., K. Verhoest, and B. Kleizen. 2017. “More Reforms, Less Innovation? The Impact of Structural Reform Histories on Innovation-Oriented Cultures in Public Organizations.” Public Management Review 19 (8): 1142–1164. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1266021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar