The institutionalization of public sector innovation

References

• Agergaard, S., and A. M. La Cour. 2012. “Governing Integration through Sports. A Case Study of Civil Society Involvement in Welfare Policy.” Journal of Nordic Migration Research 2 (1): 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and J. Torfing, Eds. 2014. Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Askim, J., U. Hjelmar, and L. H. Pedersen. 2018. “Turning Innovation into Evidence-based Policies: Lessons Learned from Free Commune Experiments.” Scandinavian Political Studies 41 (4): 288–308. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.12130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bason, C. 2010. Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bekken, J. T., F. Longva, N. Fearnley, and O. Osland. 2006. “Norwegian Experiences with Tendered Bus Services.” European Transport 33: 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V., J. Edelenbos, and B. Steijn. 2011. Innovation in the Public Sector: Linking Capacity and Leadership. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Borins, S. 2001. The Challenge of Innovating in Government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. 2000. Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cinar, E., P. Trott, and C. Simms. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Barriers to Public Sector Innovation Process.” Public Management Review 21 (2): 264–290. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, E. S., and J. M. Cook. 1999. “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaning Durability and Change.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441–466. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., and M. Schneider. 2009. “Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19: 495–522. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2016. “Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” Public Administration 94 (1): 146–166. doi:10.1111/padm.2016.94.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., L. Hulgård, and V. Pestoff. 2014. Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: Changing European Landscapes. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeHart-Davis, L. 2009. “Green Tape: A Theory of Effective Organizational Rules.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (2): 361–384. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., and R. B. Denhardt. 2001. Creating a Culture of Innovation: 10 Lessons from America’s Best Run City. Arlington, VA: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
   Google Scholar
• Domberger, S., and P. Jensen. 1997. “Contracting Out by the Public Sector: Theory, Evidence, Prospects.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 13 (4): 67–78. doi:10.1093/oxrep/13.4.67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggers, W. D., and S. K. Singh. 2009. The Public Innovator’s Playbook: Nurturing Bold Ideas in Government. Cambridge, MA: Deloitte and the Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Innobarometer 2010. Innovation in Public Administration. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gieske, H., B. George, I. Van Meerkerk, and A. Van Buuren. 2019. “Innovating and Optimizing in Public Organizations: Does More Become Less?” Public Management Review. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1588356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greif, A., and D. D. Laitin. 2004. “A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 633–652. doi:10.1017/S0003055404041395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. 2010. “Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective.” In Explaining Institutional Change, edited by J. Mahoney and K. Thelen, 204–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. 2005. “Innovation in Governance and Public Service: Past and Present.” Public Money & Management 25 (1): 27–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. 2006. Innovation and Its Contribution to Improvement – A Review for Policy-makers, Policy Advisers, Managers and Researchers. London: Warwick Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. 2010. “The Attributes of Human Service Organizations.” In Human Services as Complex Organizations, edited by Y. Hasenfeld, 2nd ed., 9–32. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelmar, U., K. Iversen, and M. W. Strandby. 2018. Tværgående Evaluering Af Satspuljen – Et Metoderedskab [Evaluation across the Rate Adjustment Pool – A Methodological Tool]. Copenhagen: VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. 2000. Privatization – An International Review of Performance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. 2018. Privatization. An International Review on Performance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A., and M. Ventresca, Eds. 2002. Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holljen, E. T. B., S. Højlund, J. Ladenburg, O. H. Petersen, K. Vrangbæk, and G. Weihe. 2011. Strategic Use of Public-private Cooperation in the Nordic Region. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1995. “The “new Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2): 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., and R. Dixon. 2015. A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, E. B., and L. J. Pratt. 2007. “Is Contracting Out Government Services the Panacea? Evidence from Public School Transportation in Louisiana.” Journal of Public Enterprise 23 (1): 67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. L. F. 2013. “Bureaukrati: Ven Eller Fjende Af (offentlig Sektor) Innovation? [Bureaucracy: Friend or Enemy of (public Sector) Innovation?].” Politica 45 (3): 250–266.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, S. 2005. Unleashing Change: A Study of Organizational Renewal in Government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koning, E. A. 2016. “The Three Institutionalisms and Institutional Dynamics: Understanding Endogenous and Exogenous Change.” Journal of Public Policy 36 (4): 639–664. doi:10.1017/S0143814X15000240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public Vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, M., E. Blomkamp, and J. M. Lewis. 2018. “The Rise of Public Sector Innovation Labs: Experiments in Design Thinking for Policy.” Policy Sciences 51: 249–267. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7. March.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W. 1996. “Otherhood: The Promulgation and Transmission of Ideas in the Modern Organizational Environment.” In Translating Organizational Change, edited by B. Czarniawska and B. Sevon, 241–252. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. 2005. “Break-Through Innovations and Continuous Improvement: Two Different Models of Innovative Processes in the Public Sector.” Public Money and Management 25 (1): 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. 2011. Lessons from PFI and Other Projects. London: Statutory Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nauta, F., and P. Kasbergen. 2009. OECD Literature Review. Public Sector Innovation [Final draft]. https://surfsharekit.nl/publiek/han/b48224e9-7412-44d9-bc20-59779af0d933
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., and K. J. Meier. 2011. Public Management: Organizations, Governance, and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Systems Approaches to Public Sector Challenges: Working with Change. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., and L. Brown, eds. 2013. Handbook of Innovation in Public Services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, O. H., U. Hjelmar, and K. Vrangbæk. 2018. “Is Contracting Out of Public Services Still the Great Panacea? A Systematic Review of Studies on Economic and Quality Effects from 2000 to 2014.” Social Policy & Administration 52 (1): 130–157. doi:10.1111/spol.12297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2004. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raffaelli, R., and M. A. Glynn 2015. “Institutional Innovation: Novel, Useful, and Legitimate.” In Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship: Multilevel Linkages, edited by C. E. Shalley, M. A. Hitt, and J. Zhou. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regeringen. 2007. På Vej Mod En Kvalitetsreform [Towards a Quality Reform]. Copenhagen: Government of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Roehrich, J. K., M. A. Lewis, and G. George. 2014. “Are Public-private Partnerships A Healthy Option? A Systematic Literature Review.” Social Science and Medicine 113: 110–119. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. 1998. Moderne Organisasjoner. Trender I Organisasjonstenkingen [Modern Organizations. Trends in the Thinking of Organizations]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. W. 1991. “Unpacking Institutional Arguments.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by P. J. DiMaggio and W. W. Powell, 164–182. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting. 2017. Innovationslab För Samhällsutveckling [Innovation Labs and Societal Development]. Stockholm: Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2016. Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Veenswijk, M. 2006. Organizing Innovation: New Approaches to Cultural Change and Intervention in Public Sector Organizations. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, B., and N. Fain. 2018. “Regulatory Influences on Innovation in the Public Sector: The Role of Regulatory Regimes.” Public Management Review 20 (8): 1205–1227. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1350282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. 2008. “An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a Configuration Framework.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 591–615. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. 2014. “Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A Review and Extension.” Public Management Review 16 (1): 21–44. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.771698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wier, M. 1992. “Ideas and the Politics of Bounded Innovation.” In Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, edited by S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, and F. Longstreth, 188–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wooten, M., and A. J. Hoffman. 2008. “Organizational Fields: Past, Present and Future.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin, 129–149. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zornoza, C. C., M. B. Navarro, and M. S. Ciprés. 2007. “A Meta-analysis of Organizational Innovation.” In Contemporary Corporate Strategy: Global Perspectives, edited by J. Saee, 61–75. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar