The effects of organizational and demographic context for innovation implementation in public organizations

References

• Acs, Z. J., D. B. Audretsch, E. E. Lehmann, and G. Licht. 2017. “National Systems of Innovation.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 42 (5): 997–1008. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S. B. 2018. “Is All Turnover Intent the Same? Exploring Future Job Preference and Environmental Considerations.” Public Management Review 20 (12): 1768–1789. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1417464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsos, G. A., T. H. Clausen, and E. J. Isaksen. 2016. “Innovation among Public-Sector Organisations: Push and Pull Factors.” In Entrepreneurial and Innovative Practices in Public Institutions: A Quality of Life Approach, edited by J. Leitão and H. Alves, 81–98. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., K. Potočnik, and J. Zhou. 2014. “Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework.” Journal of Management 40 (5): 1297–1333. doi:10.1177/0149206314527128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., C. Bloch, and B. Ferguson. 2019. “Advancing Innovation in the Public Sector: Aligning Innovation Measurement with Policy Goals.” Research Policy 48 (3): 789–798. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., and D. Huber. 2013. “From Too Little to Too Much Innovation? Issues in Measuring Innovation in the Public Sector.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 27: 146–159. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., L. Casali, and H. Hollanders. 2015. “How European Public Sector Agencies Innovate: The Use of Bottom-up, Policy-dependent and Knowledge-scanning Innovation Methods.” Research Policy 44 (7): 1271–1282. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and E. Lehmann. 2016. The Seven Secrets of Germany: Economic Resilience in an Era of Global Turbulence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aufrecht, S. E., and L. S. Bun. 1995. “Reform with Chinese Characteristics: The Context of Chinese Civil Service Reform.” Public Administration Review 55 (2): 175–182. doi:10.2307/977183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2009. Powering Ideas: An Innovation Agenda for the 21st Century. Canberra, ACT: Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2010. Ahead of the Game: Blueprint for Reform of Australian Government Administration. edited by Australian Government Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Barton, ACT, Australia: Advisory Group on Reform of Australian Government Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government, Public Sector Innovation. 2019. “Department of industry, innovation and science.” Accessed February 4 2019. https://innovation.govspace.gov.au/
   Google Scholar
• Australian Management Advisory Committee. 2010. Empowering Change: Fostering Innovation in the Australian Public Service. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Australian National Audit Office. 2009. Innovation in the Public Sector: Enabling Better Performance, Driving New Directions. Barton, ACT, Australia: Australian National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• APSC (Australian Public Service Commission). 2011. State of the Service Report 2010–2011: Australian Public Service Employee Survey Results. Canberra, ACT: Australian Public Service Commission.
   Google Scholar
• APSC (Australian Public Service Commission). 2012a. State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2011–2012. Canberra, ACT: Australian Public Service Commission.
   Google Scholar
• APSC (Australian Public Service Commission). 2012b. Appendix 3 - Survey Methodologies. http://www.apsc.gov.au/about-the-apsc/parliamentary/state-of-the-service/2011-12-sosr/appendix-3-survey-methodologies
   Google Scholar
• APSC (Australian Public Service Commission). 2017. State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2016–2017. Canberra, ACT: Australian Public Service Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R. 1994. “Comparative Public Management: Coming in from the Cold.” In Comparative Public Management: Putting US Public Policy and Implementation in Context, edited by R. Baker, 1–8. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberger, P. 2008. “From the Editors beyond Contextualization: Using Context Theories to Narrow the Micro-macro Gap in Management Research.” Academy of Management Journal 51 (5): 839–846. doi:10.5465/amj.2008.34789630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankins, S., B. Denness, A. Kriz, and C. Molloy. 2017. “Innovation Agents in the Public Sector: Applying Champion and Promotor Theory to Explore Innovation in the Australian Public Service.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 76 (1): 122–137. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrutia, J. M., and C. Echebarria. 2019. “Drivers of Exploitative and Explorative Innovation in a Collaborative Public-sector Context.” Public Management Review 21 (3): 446–472. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1500630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E. M., and C-G. Kim. 2010. “Creativity Management in Public Organizations: Jump-starting Innovation.” Public Performance & Management Review 33 (4): 619–652. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576330405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezes, P., and G. Jeannot. 2018. “Autonomy and Managerial Reforms in Europe: Let or Make Public Managers Manage?” Public Administration 96 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1111/padm.12361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borins, S. 2001. The Challenge of Innovating in Government. Arlington, VA: PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Borins, S. 2018. “Public Sector Innovation in a Context of Radical Populism.” Public Management Review 20 (12): 1858–1871.
   Google Scholar
• Borins, S. F., ed. 2009. Innovations in Government: Research, Recognition, and Replication. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borins, S. F. 2014. The Persistence Of Innovation in Government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press with Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Breul, J. D., and J. M. Kamensky. 2008. “Federal Government Reform: Lessons from Clinton’s “reinventing Government” and Bush’s “management Agenda” Initiatives.” Public Administration Review 68 (6): 1009–1026. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00950.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugge, M. M., and C. W. Bloch. 2016. “Between Bricolage and Breakthroughs—Framing the Many Faces of Public Sector Innovation.” Public Money & Management 36 (4): 281–288. doi:10.1080/09540962.2016.1162599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bysted, R., and J. R. Hansen. 2015. “Comparing Public and Private Sector Employees’ Innovative Behaviour: Understanding the Role of Job and Organizational Characteristics, Job Types, and Subsectors.” Public Management Review 17 (5): 698–717. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinar, E., P. Trott, and C. Simms. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Barriers to Public Sector Innovation Process.” Public Management Review 21 (2): 264–290. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120. doi:10.1086/228943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collm, A., and K. Schedler. 2014. “Strategies for Introducing Organizational Innovation to Public Service Organizations.” Public Management Review 16 (1): 140–161. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.822528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. 1991. “Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators.” Academy of Management Journal 34 (3): 555–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., and M. Schneider. 2009. “Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (3): 495–522. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., R. M. Walker, and C. N. Avellaneda. 2009. “Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations.” Journal of Management Studies 46 (4): 650–675. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lancer Julnes, P., and E. Gibson. 2016. Innovation in the Public and Nonprofit Sectors: A Public Solutions Handbook. 5 Vols. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, H., L. G. Tummers, and V. J. J. M. Bekkers. 2018. “A Stakeholder Perspective on Public Sector Innovation: Why Position Matters.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 84 (2): 269–287. doi:10.1177/2F0020852317715513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, H., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2016. “Innovations in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” Public Administration 94 (1): 146–166. doi:10.1111/padm.12209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, M. A. 2018. “The Effects of Empowerment Practices on Perceived Barriers to Innovation: Evidence from Public Organizations.” International Journal of Public Administration 41 (15): 1302–1313. doi:10.1080/01900692.2017.1387143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, M. A., and D. B. Audretsch. 2017. “Conditions for Innovation in Public Sector Organizations.” Research Policy 46 (9): 1681–1691. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, M. A., and D. B. Audretsch. 2019. “Public Sector Innovation: The Effect of Universities.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 44 (2): 596–614. doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9636-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drechsler, W., and T. Randma-Liiv. 2016. “In Some Central and Eastern European Countries, Some NPM Tools May Sometimes Work: A Reply to Dan and Pollitt’s ‘NPM Can Work’.” Public Management Review 18 (10): 1559–1565. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1114137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P. 2014. Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Approaches in Political Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, S., R. E. Reynoso, A. Garanasvili, K. Saxena, B. Lanvin, S. Wunsch-Vincent, L. R. León, and F. Guadagno. 2018. “Chapter 1: The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation.” In The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation, 11th ed., edited by S. Dutta, B. Lanvin, and S. Wunsch-Vincent, 3-54. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. 2007. “How Bureaucratic Structure Matters: An Organizational Perspective.” In The Handbook of Public Administration, edited by B. Guy Peters and J. Pierre, 77–87. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, (EC). 2011. “Innobarometer 2010: Analytical Report: Innovation in Public Organization.” [Flash Eurobarometer Series #305]. Brussels: Directorate General Communication, the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., and L. R. Wise. 2010. “An Exploration of Why Public Organizations ‘Ingest’ Innovations.” Public Administration 88 (4): 979–998. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01857.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gault, F. 2018. “Defining and Measuring Innovation in All Sectors of the Economy.” Research Policy 47 (3): 617–622. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., G. Robert, F. Macfarlane, P. Bate, and O. Kyriakidou. 2004. “Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations.” Milbank Quarterly 82 (4): 581–629. doi:10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulrajani, N., and K. Moloney. 2012. “Globalizing Public Administration: Today’s Research and Tomorrow’s Agenda.” Public Administration Review 72 (1): 78–86. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02489.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 2007. “Advocacy and Innovation in Interagency Management: The Case of Centrelink.” Governance 20 (3): 445–467. doi:10.1111/gove.2007.20.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, T., J. Hauknes, I. Miles, and R. Røste. 2005. Innovation in the Public Sector: On the Differences between Public and Private Sector Innovation. [Publin Report No. D9]. Oslo: PUBLIN.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., and J. Freeman. 1984. “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review 49: 149–164. doi:10.2307/2095567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. A., and S. Pihl-Thingvad. 2018. “Managing Employee Innovative Behaviour through Transformational and Transactional Leadership Styles.” Public Management Review 21 (6):918–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, M. S. 1996. “The Contextless Nature of Public Administration in Third World Countries.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 62 (3): 315–329. doi:10.1177/002085239606200303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. 2014. “New Development: Eight and a Half Propositions to Stimulate Frugal Innovation.” Public Money & Management 34 (3): 227–232. doi:10.1080/09540962.2014.908034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., A. Cepilovs, W. Drechsler, T. Kalvet, V. Lember, and T. Piret. 2013. Can We Measure Public Sector Innovation? A Literature Review. Tallinn, Estonia: LIPSE.
   Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., W. Wolfgang Drechsler, and E. Karo. 2019. Innovation Bureaucracies: Let's Make The State Entrepreneurial. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. 2005. The Global Public Management Revolution. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., P. G. Roness, and K. Verhoest. 2011. “Explaining The Innovative Culture and Activities Of State Agencies.” Organization Studies 32 (10): 1321-1347. doi: 10.1177/0170840611416744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapuente, V., and K. Suzuki. 2017. The Prudent Entrepreneurs. Women and Public Sector Innovation. [Working paper]. Sweden: QOG Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Link, A. N., and D. S. Siegel. 2007. Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Technological Change. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lœgreid, P., P. G. Roness, and K. Verhoest. 2011. “Explaining the Innovative Culture and Activities of State Agencies.” Organization Studies 32 (10): 1321–1347. doi:10.1177/0170840611416744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund Vinding, A. 2006. “Absorptive Capacity and Innovative Performance: A Human Capital Approach.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4–5): 507–517. doi:10.1080/10438590500513057.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., A. Rutherford, and C. N. Avellaneda. 2017. Comparative Public Management: Why National, Environmental, and Organizational Context Matters. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. 2014. “From Hero-Innovators to Distributed Heroism: An In-depth Analysis of the Role of Individuals in Public Sector Innovation.” Public Management Review 16 (2): 199–216. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.806575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, B., L. Jensen, A. Roberts, M. I. Dussauge‐Laguna, V. Junjan, R. Torenvlied, A. Boin, H. K. Colebatch, D. Kettl, and R. Durant. 2016. “Is Public Management Neglecting the State?” Governance 29 (3): 311–334. doi:10.1111/gove.12201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldogaziev, T. T., and W. G. Resh. 2016. “A Systems Theory Approach to Innovation Implementation: Why Organizational Location Matters.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26: 677–692. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafukho, F. M., N. Hairston, and K. Brooks. 2004. “Human Capital Theory: Implications for Human Resource Development.” Human Resource Development International 7 (4): 545–551. doi:10.1080/1367886042000299843.
   Google Scholar
• Nasi, G., F. Frosini, and D. Cristofoli. 2011. “Online Service Provision: Are Municipalities Really Innovative? the Case of Larger Municipalities in Italy.” Public Administration 89 (3): 821–839. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01865.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neter, J., M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4 Vols. Chicago: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., and K. J. Meier. 2015. “Public Management, Context, and Performance: In Quest of a More General Theory.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (1): 237–256. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. The Innovation Imperative in the Public Sector: Setting an Agenda for Action. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Fostering Innovation in the Public Sector. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/Eurostat. 2018. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting, and Using Data on Innovation. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., and K. Brown. 2005. Managing Change and Innovation in Public Sector Organisations. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., and L. Brown. 2011. “Innovation, Public Policy and Public Services Delivery in the UK. The Word that Would Be King.” Public Administration 89 (4): 1335–1350. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Toole, L.J., and K. J. Meier. 1999. “Modeling The Impact of Public Management: Implications of Structural Context.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9 (4): 505–526. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024421.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., and K. L. Kraemer. 1986. “Research Methodology in The” Public Administration Review,” 1975–1984.” Public Administration Review 46 (3): 215–226. doi:10.2307/3110436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. 1992. Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., and A. L. Delbecq. 1977. “Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation.” Academy of Management Review 2 (1): 27–37. doi:10.5465/amr.1977.4409154.
   Google Scholar
• Pieterse, A. N., D. Van Knippenberg, M. Schippers, and D. Stam. 2010. “Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Role of Psychological Empowerment.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 31 (4): 609–623. doi:10.1002/job.650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2012. “Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It.” Annual Review of Psychology 63: 539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2013. Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link? Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2017. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-into the Age of Austerity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, J., and T. Kastelle. 2010. “Public Sector Innovation Research: What’s Next?” Innovation 12 (2): 122–137. doi:10.5172/impp.12.2.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, F. W. 1980. “The Ecology and Context of Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective.” Public Administration Review 40 (2): 107–115. doi:10.2307/975620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinne, T., G. Daniel Steel, and J. Fairweather. 2012. “Hofstede and Shane Revisited: The Role of Power Distance and Individualism in National-level Innovation Success.” Cross-cultural Research 46 (2): 91–108. doi:10.1177/1069397111423898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., and G. F. Davis. 2015. Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. 2018. “Keynote Address at the Launch of the IPAA Series ‘Doing Policy Differently’.” Canberra, March 22. https://vs286790.blob.core.windows.net/docs/Doing-Policy-Differently-Heather-Smith.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. 2005. “Economic Infrastructures and Innovation Systems.” In Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations, edited by C. Edquist, 86–106. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K. 2017. “Government Expenditure Cuts and Voluntary Activities of Citizens: The Experience of Japanese Municipalities.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 39 (4): 258–275. doi:10.1080/23276665.2017.1403179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K. 2018. “Government Retrenchment and Citizen Participation in Volunteering: A Cross-national Analysis of OECD Countries.” Public Policy and Administration. doi:10.1177/0952076718796097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K., and C. N. Avellaneda. 2018. “Women and Risk-taking Behaviour in Local Public Finance.” Public Management Review 20 (12): 1741–1767. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1412118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K., and H. Hur. 2019. “Bureaucratic Structures and Organizational Commitment: Findings from a Comparative Study of 20 European Countries.” Public Management Review. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K., and M. A. Demircioglu. 2019. “The Association between Administrative Characteristics and National Level Innovative Activity: Findings from a Cross-National Study.” Public Performance & Management Review 42 (4): 755–782. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1519449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terjesen, S., N. Bosma, and E. Stam. 2016. “Advancing Public Policy for High‐growth, Female, and Social Entrepreneurs.” Public Administration Review 76 (2): 230–239. doi:10.1111/puar.12472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tõnurist, P., R. Kattel, and V. Lember. 2017. “Innovation Labs in the Public Sector: What They are and What They Do?” Public Management Review 19 (10): 1455–1479. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., and P. Triantafillou. 2016. Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torugsa, N., and A. Arundel. 2016a. “Complexity of Innovation in the Public Sector: A Workgroup-level Analysis of Related Factors and Outcomes.” Public Management Review 18 (3): 392–416. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.984626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torugsa, N. A., and A. Arundel. 2016b. “The Nature and Incidence of Workgroup Innovation in the Australian Public Sector: Evidence from the Australian 2011 State of the Service Survey.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (2): 202–221. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S. 2018. “Explaining Citizen Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Public Services.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, edited by E. Ongaro and S. Van Thiel, 227–241. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., B. Verschuere, and G. Bouckaert. 2007. “Pressure, Legitimacy, and Innovative Behavior by Public Organizations.” Governance 20 (3): 469–497. doi:10.1111/gove.2007.20.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. 2008. “An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a Configuration Framework.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 591–615. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. 2014. “Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A Review and Extension.” Public Management Review 16 (1): 21–44. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.771698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegrich, K. 2019. “The Blind Spots of Collaborative Innovation.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 12–20. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1433311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills, J., and J. Halligan. 2008. The Centrelink Experiment: Innovation in Service Delivery. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. 2000. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Windrum, P., and P. M. Koch. 2008. Innovation in Public Sector Services: Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wipulanusat, W., K. Panuwatwanich, and R. A. Stewart. 2018. “Pathways to Workplace Innovation and Career Satisfaction in the Public Service: The Role of Leadership and Culture.” International Journal of Organizational Analysis 26 (5): 890–914. doi:10.1108/IJOA-03-2018-1376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, L. R. 1999. “The Use of Innovative Practices in the Public and Private Sectors.” Public Productivity & Management Review 23 (2): 150–168. doi:10.2307/3380776.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, L. R., and S. Szucs. 1996. “The Public/Private Cleavage in a Welfare State: Attitudes toward Public Management Reform.” Governance 9 (1): 43–70. doi:10.1111/gove.1996.9.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynen, J., K. Verhoest, E. Ongaro, and S. Van Thiel, and in cooperation with the COBRA network. 2014. “Innovation-Oriented Culture in the Public Sector: Do Managerial Autonomy and Result Control Lead to Innovation?” Public Management Review 16 (1): 45–66.doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.790273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar