References
- Anastasopoulos, L. J., and A. B. Whitford. 2019. “Machine Learning for Public Administration Research, with Application to Organizational Reputation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29 (3): 491–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy060.
- Askim, J. 2015. “The Role of Performance Management in the Steering of Executive Agencies: Layered, Imbedded, or Disjointed?” Public Performance & Management Review 38 (3): 365–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006463.
- Askim, J., K. Bjurstrøm, and J. Kjærvik. 2019. “Quasi-contractual Ministerial Steering of State Agencies: Its Intensity, Modes, and How Agency Characteristics Matter.” International Public Management Journal 22 (2): 470–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1547339.
- Bach, T. 2016. “Administrative Autonomy of Public Organizations.” In Global Encyclopaedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, edited by A. Farazamand, 1–9. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Balle Hansen, M., T. Steen, and M. de Jong. 2013. “New Public Management, Public Service Bargains and the Challenges of Interdepartmental Coordination: A Comparative Analysis of Top Civil Servants in State Administration.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 79 (1): 29–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312467550.
- Binderkrantz, A. S., and J. G. Christensen. 2009. “Delegation without Agency Loss? The Use of Performance Contracts in Danish Central Government.” Governance 22 (2): 263–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01435.x.
- Askim, J., K. Bjurstrøm, and J. Kjærvik. 2018. “Performance contracting in central government Performance contracting in central government” [Styring gjennom tildelingsbrev Performance contracting in central government] (dataset). doi:https://doi.org/10.18710/E3W52Q, DataverseNO, V2
- Bouckaert, G., B. G. Peters, and K. Verhoest. 2010. The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations: Shifting Patterns of Public Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Busuioc, E. M. 2015. “Friend or Foe? Inter-Agency Cooperation, Organizational Reputation, and Turf.” Public Administration 94 (1): 40–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12160.
- Christensen, T., M. Egeberg, P. Lægreid, and J. Trondal. 2018. Sentralforvaltningen: Stabilitet og endring gjennom 40 år. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
- Christensen, T., O. A. Danielsen, P. Lægreid, and L. H. Rykkja. 2016. “Comparing Coordination Structures for Crisis Management in Six Countries.” Public Administration 94 (2): 316–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12186.
- Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson. 1997. “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management.” Academy of Management Review 22 (1): 20–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9707180258.
- Denhardt, K. G., and M. P. Aristigueta. 2008. “Performance Management Systems: Providing Accountability and Challenging Collaboration.” In Performance Information in the Public Sector: How It Is Used, edited by W. Van Dooren and S. Van de Walle, 106–124. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Egeberg, M. 2003. “How Bureaucratic Structure Matters: An Organizational Perspective.” In The Sage Handbook of Public Administration, edited by B. G. Peters and J. Pierre, 77–87. London: Sage.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review.” The Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 57–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/258191.
- Fimreite, A. L., and P. Lægreid. 2009. “Reorganizing the Welfare State Administration.” Public Management Review 11 (3): 281–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030902798198.
- Frederickson, H. G. 2007. “When Accountability Meets Collaboration.” PA Times 30 (2): 11.
- Grimmer, J., and B. M. Stewart. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028.
- Gulick, L. 1937. “Notes on the Theory of Organization.” In Papers on the Science of Administration, edited by L. Gulick and L. Urwin, 1–46. Concord, NH: Rumford Press.
- Hall, R. H., J. P. Clark, P. C. Giordano, P. V. Johnson, and M. Van Roekel. 1977. “Patterns of Interorganizational Relationships.” Administrative Science Quarterly 22 (3): 457–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2392183.
- Halligan, J. 2015. “Coordination of Welfare through a Large Integrated Organization: The Australian Department of Human Services.” Public Management Review 17 (7): 1002–1020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1029346.
- Halligan, J., C. S. Sarrico, M. Lee Rhodes, and C. S. Sarrico. 2012. “On the Road to Performance Governance in the Public Domain?” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 61 (3): 224–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211205623.
- Heims, E. 2019. “Why Cooperation between Agencies Is (sometimes) Possible: Turf Protection as Enabler of Regulatory Cooperation in the European Union.” In The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non‐Coordination: Executive Politics and Governance, edited by T. Back and K. Wegrich, 113–131. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hollibaugh, G. E. 2018. “The Use of Text as Data Methods in Public Administration: A Review and an Application to Agency Priorities.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29 (3): 474–490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy045.
- Hood, C. 1976. The Limits of Administration. London: Wiley.
- Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
- Kettl, D. F. 1997. “The Global Revolution in Public Management: Driving Themes, Missing Links.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 16 (3): 446–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199722)16:3<446::AID-PAM5>3.0.CO;2-H.
- Kolltveit, K. 2012. “Presidentialisation in the Executive Sphere? Evidence from Norwegian Cabinets.” Scandinavian Political Studies 35 (4): 372–392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00293.x.
- Kolltveit, K. 2013. “Concentration of Decision-Making Power: Investigating the Role of the Norwegian Cabinet Subcommittee.” World Political Science Review 9 (1): 173–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/wpsr-2013-0008.
- Kolltveit, K. 2015. “Strengthening of the Executive Centre: Looking beyond NPM as the Explanation for Change.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81 (1): 18–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314541566.
- Kolltveit, K. 2019. “On the Minister’s Tight Leash? Media Appearance and Autonomy in Public Agencies.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 23 (1): 41–58.
- Koop, C. 2011. “Explaining the Accountability of Independent Agencies: The Importance of Political Salience.” Journal of Public Policy 31 (2): 209–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X11000080.
- Krippendorff, K. 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Kristiansen, M. B. 2016. “One Scandinavian Approach to Management by Objectives and Results?” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 20 (1): 45–70.
- Lægreid, P., L. H. Rykkja, K. Sarapuu, and T. Randma-Liiv, eds. 2014. Organizing for Coordination in the Public Sector: Practices and Lessons from 12 European Countries. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Lægreid, P., L. H. Rykkja, K. Sarapuu, and T. Randma-Liiv. 2015. “New Coordination Challenges in the Welfare State.” Public Management Review 17 (7): 927–939. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1029344.
- Lægreid, P., P. G. Roness, and K. Rubecksen. 2006. “Performance Management in Practice: The Norwegian Way.” Financial Accountability & Management 22 (3): 251–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00402.x.
- Lægreid, P., P. G. Roness, and V. Rolland. 2013. “Agencification and Corporatization in Norway 1947–2011.” International Journal of Public Administration 36 (9): 659–672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.791311.
- Lamothe, M., and S. Lamothe. 2012. “To Trust or Not to Trust? What Matters in Local Government-Vendor Relationships?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (4): 867–892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur063.
- Majone, G. 2001. “Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance.” European Union Politics 2 (1): 103–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116501002001005.
- March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
- Mikhaylov, S., M. Laver, and K. R. Benoit. 2012. “Coder Reliability and Misclassification in the Human Coding of Party Manifestos.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 78–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr047.
- Moynihan, D. P., S. Fernandez, S. Kim, K. M. LeRoux, S. J. Piotrowski, B. E. Wright, and K. Yang. 2011. “Performance Regimes Amidst Governance Complexity.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (suppl_1): i141–i155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq059.
- Moynihan, D. P., and S. K. Pandey. 2006. “Creating Desirable Organizational Characteristics.” Public Management Review 8 (1): 119–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030500518899.
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD). 2018. “The Norwegian State Administration Database.” http://www.nsd.uib.no/polsys/en/civilservice/
- Norwegian Government Agency for Financial Management (DFØ). 2018. DFØ Guidance Note - Annual Report for Government Agencies [DFØ Veiledningsnotat – Årsrapport for statlige virksomheter]. Veiledningsnotat.
- Osborne, S. P. 2006. “The New Public Governance?” Public Management Review 8 (3): 377–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022.
- Overman, S., M. Van Genugten, and S. Van Thiel. 2015. “Accountability After Structural Disaggregation: Comparing Agency Accountability Arrangements.” Public Administration 93 (4): 1102–1120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12185.
- Pandey, S., S. K. Pandey, and L. Miller. 2017. “Measuring Innovativeness of Public Organizations: Using Natural Language Processing Techniques in Computer-Aided Textual Analysis.” International Public Management Journal 20 (1): 78–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1143424.
- Peters, B. G. 1998. “Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination.” Public Administration 76 (2): 295–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00102.
- Peters, B. G. 2004. “Back to the Centre? Rebuilding the State.” The Political Quarterly 75 (s1): 130–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2004.628_1.x.
- Pierre, J., and B. G. Peters. 2017. “The Shirking Bureaucrat: A Theory in Search of Evidence?” Policy & Politics 45 (2): 157–172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14845830916703.
- Pollitt, C. 2006. “Performance Management in Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (1): 25–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui045.
- Roberts, C. W. 2000. “A Conceptual Framework for Quantitative Text Analysis.” Quality and Quantity 34 (3): 259–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004780007748.
- Rommel, J., and J. Christiaens. 2009. “Steering from Ministers and Departments.” Public Management Review 11 (1): 79–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802493569.
- Scharpf, F. W. 1994. “Games Real Actors Could Play: Positive and Negative Coordination in Embedded Negotiations.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (1): 27–53. doi:.
- Schillemans, T. 2013. “Moving beyond the Clash of Interests: On Stewardship Theory and the Relationships between Central Government Departments and Public Agencies.” Public Management Review 15 (4): 541–562. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.691008.
- Sundaramurthy, C., and M. Lewis. 2003. “Control and Collaboration: Paradoxes of Governance.” The Academy of Management Review 28 (3): 397–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/30040729.
- Van Slyke, D. M. 2007. “Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to Understand the Government-Nonprofit Social Service Contracting Relationship.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (2): 157–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul012.
- van Thiel, S., and K. Yesilkagit. 2011. “Good Neighbours or Distant Friends?” Public Management Review 13 (6): 783–802. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.539111.
- Verhoest, K., B. G. Peters, G. Bouckaert, and B. Verschuere. 2004. “The Study of Organisational Autonomy: A Conceptual Review.” Public Administration and Development 24 (2): 101–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.316.
- Verhoest, K., and J. Wynen. 2018. “Why Do Autonomous Public Agencies Use Performance Management Techniques? Revisiting the Role of Basic Organizational Characteristics.” International Public Management Journal 21 (4): 619–649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1199448.
- Waardenburg, M., M. Groenleer, J. de Jong, and B. Keijser. 2019. “Paradoxes of Collaborative Governance: Investigating the Real-life Dynamics of Multiagency Collaborations Using a Quasi-experimental Action-research Approach.” Public Management Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1599056.
- Waterman, R. W., and K. J. Meier. 1998. “Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (2): 173–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024377.
- Wegrich, K. 2015. “Accommodating a Foreign Object: Federalism, Coordination and Performance Management in the Reform of German Employment Administration.” Public Management Review 17 (7): 940–959. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1029345.
- Wilson, J. Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.