Employing complexity: complexification management for locked issues

References

• Aagaard, P. 2012. “The Challenge of Adaptive Capability in Public Organizations.” Public Management Review 14 (6): 731–746. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.642626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbot, A. 1992. “What Do Cases Do? Some Notes on Activity in Sociological Analysis.” In What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, edited by C. C. Ragin and H. S. Becker, 53–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire. 2004. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, P. M., M. Strathern, and L. Varga. 2010. “Complexity: The Evolution of Identity and Diversity.” In Complexity, Difference and Identity, edited by P. Cilliers and R. Preiser, 41–60. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, W. R. 1991. “Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems.” In Facets of Systems Science, edited by G. J. Klir, 405–417. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 2010. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. 1992. “Cases, Causes, Conjunctures, Stories, and Imagery.” In What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, edited by C. C. Ragin and S. B. Howard, 205–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bezes, P., A. L. Fimreite, P. L. Lidec, and P. Laegreid. 2013. “Understanding Organizational Reforms in the Modern State: Specialization and Integration in Norway and France.” Governance 26 (1): 147–175. doi:10.1111/gove.2013.26.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton, J. G., P. M. Allen, and C. Bowman. 2015. Embracing Complexity: Strategic Perspectives for an Age of Turbulence. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637.
   Google Scholar
• Busscher, T., T. Tillema, and J. Arts. 2015. “Improving Project Delivery; Programmes as the Silver Bullet?” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 15 (2): 163–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelnovo, W., and M. Sorrentino. 2018. “Engaging with Complexity in a Public Programme Implementation.” Public Management Review 20 (7): 1013–1031. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1364406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2007. “The Whole‐of‐government Approach to Public Sector Reform.” Public Administration Review 67 (6): 1059–1066. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P., and R. Preiser. 2010. In Complexity, Difference and Identity: An Ethical Perspective, edited by P. Cilliers and R. Preiser. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, J. 2001. Wicked Problems and Social Complexity. Napa: CogNexus Institute.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” The American Economic Review 75 (2): 332–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daviter, F. 2017. “Coping, Taming or Solving: Alternative Approaches to the Governance of Wicked Problems.” Policy Studies 38 (6): 571–588. doi:10.1080/01442872.2017.1384543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzau, A. T., and D. C. North. 1994. “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions.” Kyklos 47 (1): 3–31. doi:10.1111/kykl.1994.47.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djelic, M., and S. Quack. 2007. “Overcoming Path Dependency: Path Generation in Open Systems.” Theory and Society 36 (2): 161–186. doi:10.1007/s11186-007-9026-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2006. “Design Problems and Design Paradoxes.” Design Issues 22 (3): 4–17. doi:10.1162/desi.2006.22.3.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, B. 2005. “Can Path Dependence Explain Institutional Change? Two Approaches Applied to Welfare State Reform.” Paper presented at the.
   Google Scholar
• Eppel, E. 2012. “What Does It Take to Make Surprises Less Surprising? the Contribution of Complexity Theory to Anticipation in Public Management.” Public Management Review 14 (7): 881–902. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.650055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppel, E. A., and M. L. Rhodes. 2018. “Complexity Theory and Public Management: A ‘becoming’field.” Public Management Review 20 (7–8): 949–959. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1364414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. 2009. “Building Administrative Capacity for the Age of Rapid Globalization: A Modest Prescription for the Twenty‐first Century.” Public Administration Review 69 (6): 1007–1020. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimreite, A. L., and P. Lægreid. 2005. Specialization and Coordination: Implications for Integration and Autonomy in a Multi-level System. Bergen: Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Science Matters and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., N. Bruzelius, and W. Rothengatter. 2003. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., A. Kumaraswamy, and P. Karnøe. 2010. “Path Dependence or Path Creation?” Journal of Management Studies 47 (4): 760–774. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and P. Karnoe. 2001. Path Dependence and Creation. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In The Interpretation of Cultures. Selected Essays by Clifford Geertz, edited by C. Geertz, 3–32. New York: Basic Books Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L. 2012. Punching Clouds: An Introduction to the Complexity of Public Decision-making. Litchfield Park: Emergent Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L., and P. Marks. 2008. “Complex Bounded Rationality in Dyke Construction: Path-dependency, Lock-in in the Emergence of the Geometry of the Zeeland Delta.” Land Use Policy 25 (3): 330–337. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L., and P. Marks. 2017. Understanding Collective Decision Making: A Fitness Landscape Model Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gershenson, C., and T. Lenaerts. 2008. “Evolution of Complexity.” Artificial Life 14 (3): 241–243. doi:10.1162/artl.2008.14.3.14300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giezen, M. 2013. “Adaptive and Strategic Capacity: Navigating Megaprojects through Uncertainty and Complexity.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 40 (4): 723–741. doi:10.1068/b38184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giezen, M., L. Bertolini, and W. Salet. 2015. “Adaptive Capacity within A Mega Project: A Case Study on Planning and Decision-making in the Face of Complexity.” European Planning Studies 23 (5): 999–1018. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.916254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase, M., M. Roedenbeck, and A. Söllner. 2009. “A Sketch of A Mechanism-based Explanation of Cognitive Path Processes, Lock-in of Individual Mental Models and Institutional Rigidity.” In Methoden in Der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, edited by A. G. Scherer, I. M. Kaufmann, and M. Patzer, 21–46. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, P. 2015. Managing Complexity in the Public Services. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B., and J. Alford 2008. “Wicked Problems: The Implications for Public Management.” Paper presented at the Presentation to Panel on Public Management in Practice, International Research Society for Public Management 12th Annual Conference, Brisbane, March 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hertogh, M., and E. Westerveld. 2010. Playing with Complexity. Management and Organisation of Large Infrastructure Projects. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Heylighen, F. 1999. “The Growth of Structural and Functional Complexity during Evolution.” In The Evolution of Complexity, edited by  F. Heylighen, J. Bollen, and A. Riegler, 17–44. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hildreth, W. B., G. J. Miller, and J. Rabin. 2006. Handbook of Public Administration. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1111/padm.1991.69.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and M. Ramesh. 2014. “The Two Orders of Governance Failure: Design Mismatches and Policy Capacity Issues in Modern Governance.” Policy and Society 33 (4): 317–327. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huczynski, A. 2012. Management Gurus. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., and F. R. Baumgartner. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joosse-Bil, H., and G. Teisman. 2017. Zit je vast? maak het complexer! hoe complexificeren als management strategie stationsplein oost nieuw leven gaf [Are You Stuck? Make It More Complex! How Complexification as Management Strategy Gave New Life to Eastern Square.]. Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Kamoche, K., and J. V. Cunha. 2003. “Towards a Theory of Organizational Improvisation: Looking beyond the Jazz Metaphor.” Journal of Management Studies 40 (8): 2023–2051. doi:10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00410.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karré, P. M., M. van der Steen, and M. van Twist. 2011. “Steering Societal Resilience: An Empirical Exploration of Trends and Challenges in Government–Citizen Collaboration.” In New Steering Concepts in Public Management, edited by S. Groeneveld and S. Van de Walle, 57–70. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W., and J. A. Thurber. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. 2008. “Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What’s New? Key Concepts in Complexity Theory Compared to Their Counterparts in Public Administration Research.” Public Management Review 10 (3): 299–317. doi:10.1080/14719030802002675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E., and J. Koppenjan. 2012. “Governance Network Theory: Past, Present and Future.” Policy & Politics 40 (4): 587–606. doi:10.1332/030557312X655431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, B. M. 1997. “Grace, Magic and Miracles: A “Chaotic Logic” of Organizational Transformation.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 10 (5): 393–411. doi:10.1108/09534819710177495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548. doi:10.1023/A:1007113830879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review 1 (6): 894–904. doi:10.2307/2084615.
   Google Scholar
• Mitleton-Kelly, E. 2003. “Ten Principles of Complexity and Enabling Infrastructures.” In Complex Systems and Evolutionary Perspectives on Organisations: The Application of Complexity Theory to Organisations, edited by E. Mitleton-Kelly, 23–50. London: Pergamon London.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. 1986. Images of Organization. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., M. L. Rhodes, J. W. Meek, and D. Denyer. 2017. “Managing the Entanglement: Complexity Leadership in Public Sector Systems.” Public Administration Review 77 (5): 692–704. doi:10.1111/puar.2017.77.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E., and S. Van Thiel. 2018. The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector from Schoolhouse to Statehouse, from City Hall to Pentagon. New York: Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., and J. Pierre. 2003. Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267. doi:10.2307/2586011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2004. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., and A. Wildavsky. 1984. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. C. 1999. “A Coherent Framework for the Study of Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9 (2): 281–304. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024411.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., and H. S. Becker. 1992. What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Philadephia: Open university press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. 2000. “Wicked Problems and Network Approaches to Resolution.” International Public Management Review 1 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Scharmer, C. O. 2009. Theory U: Learning from the Future as It Emerges. The Social Technology of Presencing. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P., C. Scharmer, J. Jaworski, and B. Flowers. 2005. Presence: Exploring Profound Change in People, Organisations and Society. London: Nicholas Brealy Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Snowden, D. J., and M. E. Boone. 2007. “A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making.” Harvard Business Review 85 (11): 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, K. O., and R. Miikkulainen. 2004. “Competitive Coevolution through Evolutionary Complexification.” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 21: 63–100. doi:10.1613/jair.1338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., A. Windeler, G. Müller-Seitz, and K. Lange. 2012. “Path Constitution Analysis: A Methodology for Understanding Path Dependence and Path Creation.” Business Research 5 (2): 155–176. doi:10.1007/BF03342736.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N., and M. Blyth. 2011. “The Black Swan of Cairo: How Suppressing Volatility Makes the World Less Predictable and More Dangerous.” Foreign Affairs 90 (3): 33–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. 2000. “Models for Research into Decision‐making processes: On Phases, Streams and Decision‐making Rounds.” Public Administration 78 (4): 937–956. doi:10.1111/padm.2000.78.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. 2005. Publiek management op de grens van chaos en orde: Over leidinggeven en organiseren in complexiteit. The Hague: Academic Service.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. 2008. “Complexity and Management of Improvement Programmes: An Evolutionary Approach.” Public Management Review 10 (3): 341–359. doi:10.1080/14719030802002584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisman, G., A. van Buuren, and L. M. Gerrits. 2009. Managing Complex Governance Systems. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G., and E. Klijn. 2008a. “Complexity Theory and Public Management: An Introduction.” Public Management Review 10 (3): 287–297. doi:10.1080/14719030802002451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisman, G., and E. Klijn. 2008b. “Complexity Theory and Public Management: An Introduction.” Public Management Review 10 (3): 287–297. doi:10.1080/14719030802002451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C. J., A. Dewulf, G. Breeman, and S. J. Stiller. 2015. “Governance Capabilities for Dealing Wisely with Wicked Problems.” Administration & Society 47 (6): 680–710. doi:10.1177/0095399712469195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2009. “Rethinking Path Dependence in Public Policy Research.” Critical Policy Studies 3 (1): 70–83. doi:10.1080/19460170903158149.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. 2016. Gower Handbook of Project Management. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M., R. Marion, and B. McKelvey. 2007. “Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting Leadership from the Industrial Age to the Knowledge Era.” The Leadership Quarterly 18 (4): 298–318. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uprichard, E., and D. Byrne. 2006. “Representing Complex Places: A Narrative Approach.” Environment and Planning A 38 (4): 665–676. doi:10.1068/a37333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergne, J., and R. Durand. 2010. “The Missing Link between the Theory and Empirics of Path Dependence: Conceptual Clarification, Testability Issue, and Methodological Implications.” Journal of Management Studies 47 (4): 736–759. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00913.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2007. “Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation: How Citizens and Public Officials Harness the Complexities of Neighborhood Decline.” The American Review of Public Administration 37 (1): 17–50. doi:10.1177/0275074006296208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 2007. “The Generative Properties of Richness.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 14–19. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wysocki, R. 2011. Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme. Indianapolis: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Zittoun, P. 2016. “The Domestication of a “Wild” Problem: Taming Policy Agenda Setting.” In Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting, edited by N. Zahariadis, 254–272. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar