Radical and disruptive answers to downstream problems in collaborative governance?

References

• Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire. 2001. “After the Network Is Formed: Process, Power and Performance.” In Getting Results through Collaboration Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management, edited by M. Mandell, 11–29. London: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. 2006. “Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers.” Public Administration Review 66 (s1): 56–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J., and B. W. Head. 2017. “Wicked and Less Wicked Problems: A Typology and A Contingency Framework.” Policy & Society 36 (3): 397–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., E. Sørensen, and J. Torfing. 2017. “Improving Policy Implementation through Collaborative Policymaking.” Policy & Politics 45 (3): 467–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14972799760260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and J. Torfing, eds. 2014. Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bannerjee, B. 2010. “Designer as Agent of Change: A Vision for Catalyzing Rapid Change.” http://www.allemandi.com/cp/ctc/list.php
   Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M. 2019. Public Management as a Design-Oriented Professional Discipline. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C. 2010. Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-Creating for a Better Society. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C., ed. 2014a. Design for Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C. 2014b. “Design Attitude as Innovation Catalyst.” In Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design, edited by C. Ansell and J. Torfing, 209–228. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, M. E. 2014. “Design in Policy: Challenges and Sources of Hope for Policymakers.” In Design for Policy, edited by C. Bason, 11–22. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A., and I. Papadopoulos, eds. 2006. Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B. 2010. “The Next Generation of Administrative Law: Building the Legal Infrastructure for Collaborative Governance.” Wisconsin Law Review 2010 (2): 297–356.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, R. J., and F. Collopy. 2004. “Design Matters for Management.” In Management as Design, edited by R. J. Boland and F. Collopy, 3–18. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bommert, B. 2010. “Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector.” International Public Management Review 11 (1): 15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. 2005. “Public Accountability.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, edited by E. Ferlie, L. Lynne, and C. Pollitt, 182–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. 2007. “New Forms of Accountability and EU-Governance.” Comparative European Politics 5 (1): 104–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110101.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, eds. 2014. The Oxford Handbook Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. 2008. Regulatory Capitalism: How It Works, Ideas for Making It Work Better. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and M. M. Stone. 2006. “The Design and Implementation of Cross‐Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature.” Public Administration Review 66 (s1): 44–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, T., and P. J. Robertson. 2013. “Deliberation and Decision in Collaborative Governance: A Simulation of Approaches to Mitigate Power Imbalance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (2): 495–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, M. 2002. “The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships, and Joined‐up Services.” Governance 15 (1): 21–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damgaard, B., and J. M. Lewis. 2014. “Accountability and Citizen Participation.” In The Oxford Handbook Public Accountability, edited by M. Bovens, R. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, 258–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Fine Licht, J., and D. Naurin. 2016. “Transparency.” In Handbook on Theories of Governance, edited by C. Ansell and J. Torfing, 217–229. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., and T. Nabatchi. 2015. Collaborative Governance Regimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (1): 1–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, S., and J. Body. 2014. “Synthesizing Policy and Practice: The Case of Co-Designing Better Outcomes for Vulnerable Families.” In Design for Policy, edited by C. Bason, 113–122. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. A. 2015. “Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?” World Development 72: 346–361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., and E. O. Wright. 2003. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. 2000. “Assessing Inter-Organizational Collaboration: Multiple Conceptions and Multiple Methods.” In Cooperative Strategy: Economic, Business, and Organizational Issues, edited by D. Faulkner and M. De Rond, 243–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B., and J. Purdy. 2014. “Conflict in Cross-Sector Partnerships.” In Social Partnerships and Responsible Business: A Research Handbook, edited by M. M. Seitanidi and A. Crane, 205–225. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., E. Sørensen, and J. Torfing. 2013. “Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship.” Public Administration Review 73 (6): 821–830. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., ed. 1996. Creating Collaborative Advantage. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., and S. Vangen. 2013. Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. 2011. “Monitory Democracy.” In The Future of Representative Democracy, edited by S. Alonso, J. Keane, and W. Merkel, 212–235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kersbergen, K. V., and F. V. Waarden. 2004. “Politics and the Transformation of Governance: Issues of Legitimacy, Accountability, and Governance in Political Science.” European Journal of Political Research 43 (2): 143–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00149.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J., E. H. Klijn, and J. F. M. Koppenjan, eds. 1997. Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., and J. F. M. Koppenjan. 2014. “Accountable Networks.” In The Oxford Handbook Public Accountability, edited by M. Bovens, R. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, 242–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., and J. F. M. Koppenjan. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., and J. F. M. Koppenjan. 2015. Governance Networks in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., C. M. Weible, S. R. Vince, S. N. Siddiki, and J. C. Calanni. 2013. “Fostering Learning through Collaboration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (3): 591–622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M., and P. Triantafillou. 2012. “From Performance Measurement to Learning: A New Source of Government Overload?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 78 (4): 597–614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312455993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Malena, C. 2004. “Social Accountability: An Introduction to the Concept and Emerging Practice.” Social Development Papers, Participation and Civic Engagement, no. 76, The World Bank, December.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. L. 2009. The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking Is the Next Competitive Advantage. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R. 2016. “Steering.” In Handbook on Theories of Governance, edited by C. Ansell and J. Torfing, 259–266. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A., and T. Schillemans. 2009. “Fictional Citizens and Real Effects: Accountability to Citizens in Competitive and Monopolistic Markets.” Public Administration & Management 14 (2): 254–288.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M., and J. M. Cady. 2016. “Developmental Evaluation in the McKnight Foundation’s Collaborative Crop Research Program: A Journey of Discovery.” In Developmental Evaluation Exemplars: Principles in Practice, edited by M. Q. Pattern, K. McKegg, and N. Wehipeihana, 143–162. New York: Gilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. 2003. Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. 2004. “Constructing Accountability: Network Governance and Managerial Agency.” Public Policy and Administration 19 (4): 17–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670401900402.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. 2003. “Horizontal Accountability: The Legal Institutionalization of Mistrust.” In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, edited by S. Mainwaring and C. Welna, 34–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. A. 1998. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 9 (3): 112–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1998.0051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., and L. B. Bingham, eds. 2009. The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., Jr. 1997. “Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 57 (1): 45–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/976691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1971. Logic of Collective Action. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, T. A., J. R. Gil-Garcia, and L. F. Luna-Reyes. 2011. “Collaborative Governance and Cross-Boundary Information Sharing: Envisioning a Networked and IT-Enabled Public Administration.” In: The Future of Public Administration around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective, edited by R. O'Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, and S. Kim, 129–139. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2010. Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q., K. McKegg, and N. Wehipeihana. 2016. Developmental Evaluation Exemplars: Principles in Practice. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q., K. McKegg, and N. Wehipeihana. eds. 2015. Developmental Evaluation Examples. New York : Guilford Publ
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, A. R., K. Sehested, and E. Sørensen. 2011. “Emerging Theoretical Understanding of Pluricentric Coordination in Public Governance.” The American Review of Public Administration 41 (4): 375–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010378159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzotti, E., and C. Smulovitz, eds. 2006. Enforcing the Rule of Law: Social Accountability in the New Latin American Democracies. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2017. “What Is so Wicked about Wicked Problems? A Conceptual Analysis and A Research Program.” Policy & Society 36 (3): 385–396. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2003. Public Management Reform: Reliable Knowledge and International Experience. Paris: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., and A. Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and H. B. Milward. 2001. “Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public‐Sector Organizational Networks.” Public Administration Review 61 (4): 414–423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and P. Kenis. 2008. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2): 229–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. C. 2000. “Wicked Problems and Network Approaches to Resolution.” International Public Management Review 1 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. 2002. The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” Co-Design 4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 1994. “Games Real Actors Could Play.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (1): 27–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692894006001002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T. 2008. “Accountability in the Shadow of Hierarchy: The Horizontal Accountability of Agencies.” Public Organization Review 8 (2): 175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0053-8.
   Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T., M. Van Twist, and I. Vanhommerig. 2013. “Innovations in Accountability: Learning through Interactive, Dynamic, and Citizen-Initiated Forms of Accountability.” Public Performance and Management Review 36 (3): 407–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrat, O. 2010. Knowledge Solutions: Tools, Methods, and Approaches to Drive Development Forward and Enhance Its Effects. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sirianni, C. 2010. Investing in Democracy: Engaging Citizens in Collaborative Governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skilton, P. F., and K. J. Dooley. 2010. “The Effects of Repeat Collaboration on Creative Abrasion.” Academy of Management Review 35 (1): 118–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2016. “Political Leadership in the Age of Interactive Governance: Reflections on the Political Aspects of Metagovernance.” In Critical Reflections on Interactive Governance, edited by J. Edelenbos and I. van Meerkerk, 444–466. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing, eds. 2007. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2009. “Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic through Metagovernance.” Public Administration 87 (2): 234–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 2006. “Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance?” The American Review of Public Administration 36 (1): 41–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. 2003. “New Forms of Local Accountability: Coming to Terms with ‘Many Hands’?” Policy and Politics 31 (3): 353–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557303322034992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2005. “Assessment–Summative and Formative: Some Theoretical Reflections.” British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4): 466–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2016. Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, and E. Sørensen. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., E. Sørensen, and T. Fotel. 2009. “Democratic Anchorage of Infrastructural Governance Networks: The Case of the Femern Belt Forum.” Planning Theory 8 (3): 282–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209104827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. S. 1996. “Formative and Summative Evaluation: Related Issues in Performance Measurement.” Evaluation Practice 17 (2): 145–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90019-7.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, T., and W. Van Dooren. 2011. “Lost in Diffusion? How Collaborative Arrangements Lead to an Accountability Paradox.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 77 (3): 505–530. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311408648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2003. World Development Report 2004. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2016. World Development Report 2017. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar