1,138
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Does performance-based accountability impact how non-profit directors perceive organizational performance? Insights from rational planning

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Allen, P., D. Hughes, P. Vincent-Jones, C. Petsoulas, S. Doheny, and J. A. Roberts. 2016. “Public contracts as accountability mechanisms: assuring quality in public health care in England and Wales.” Public Management Review 18 (1): 20–39. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.957341.
  • Andersen, L. B., A. Boesen, and L. H. Pedersen. 2016. “Performance in public organizations: clarifying the conceptual space.” Public Administration Review 76 (6): 852–862. doi:10.1111/puar.12578.
  • Arvidson, M., and F. Lyon. 2014. “Social impact measurement and non-profit organisations: Compliance, resistance, and promotion.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 25 (4): 869–886. doi:10.1007/s11266-013-9373-6.
  • Baines, and D. Baines. 2010. “Neoliberal restructuring, activism/ participation, and social unionism in the nonprofit social services.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39 (1): 10–28. doi:10.1177/0899764008326681.
  • Baines, Charlesworth, Turner, O’neill, D. Baines, S. Charlesworth, D. Turner, and L. O’neill. 2014a. “Lean social care and worker identity: The role of outcomes, supervision and mission.” Critical Social Policy 34 (4): 433–453. doi:10.1177/0261018314538799.
  • Baines, Charlesworth, Turner, O’Neill, D. Baines, S. Charlesworth, D. Turner, and L. O’neill. 2014b. “Lean social care and worker identity: the role of outcomes, supervision and mission.” Critical Social Policy 34 (4): 433–453. doi:10.1177/0261018314538799.
  • Baines, Cunningham, Fraser, D. Baines, I. Cunningham, and H. Fraser. 2011. “Constrained by managerialism: caring as participation in the voluntary social services.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 32 (2): 329–352. doi:10.1177/0143831X10377808.
  • Bernerth, J. B., and H. Aguinis. 2016. “A critical review and best‐practice recommendations for control variable usage.” Personnel Psychology 69 (1): 229–283. doi:10.1111/peps.12103.
  • Bitektine, A., and P. Haack. 2015. “The “Macro” and the “Micro” of legitimacy: toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process.” Academy of Management Review 40 (1): 49–75. doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0318.
  • Bode, I. 2006. “Disorganized welfare mixes: voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 16 (4): 346–359. doi:10.1177/0958928706068273.
  • Bode, I. 2011. “Creeping marketization and post-corporatist governance: the transformation of state–nonprofi T relations in continental Europe.” In Governance and Regulation in the Third Sector, 123–149. Routledge.
  • Bode, I., and T. Brandsen. 2014. State-third sector partnerships: a short overview of key issues in the debate. Taylor & Francis.
  • Boxenbaum, E., and S. Jonsson. 2017. “Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: concept evolution and theoretical challenges.” The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism 2: 79–104.
  • Boyne, and G. Boyne. 2001. “Planning, performance and public services.” Public Administration 79 (1): 73–88. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00246.
  • Boyne, Chen, G. A. Boyne, and A. A. Chen. 2006. “Performance targets and public service improvement.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (3): 455–477. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul007.
  • Brandl, J., and W. H. Güttel. 2007. “Organizational antecedents of pay-for-performance systems in nonprofit organizations.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 18 (2): 176–199. doi:10.1007/s11266-007-9036-6.
  • Brandsen, T., and V. Pestoff. 2006. “Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: an introduction.” Public Management Review 8 (4): 493–501. doi:10.1080/14719030601022874.
  • Bromley, P., H. Hwang, and W. W. Powell. 2012. “Decoupling revisited: common pressures, divergent strategies in the U. S. nonprofit sector. [decoupling revisited: common pressures, divergent strategies in the U. S. nonprofit sector].” M@n@gement 15 (5): 469–501. doi:10.3917/mana.155.0469.
  • Brooks, A. C. 2002. “Can nonprofit management help answer public management’s “big questions”?” Public Administration Review 62 (3): 259–266. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00177.
  • Bryson, J. M., and B. George. 2020. “Strategic management in public administration.” In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Public Administration, edited by B. G. Peters and I. Thynn. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Buckmaster, N. 1999. “Benchmarking as a learning tool in voluntary non-profit organizations: an exploratory study.” Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory 1 (4): 603–616. doi:10.1080/14719039900000030.
  • Carnochan, S., M. Samples, M. Myers, and M. J. Austin. 2014. “Performance measurement challenges in nonprofit human service organizations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43 (6): 1014–1032. doi:10.1177/0899764013508009.
  • Cohen, J. 1988. “The effect size index: D.” Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2: 284–288.
  • Cooney, K. 2006. “The institutional and technical structuring of nonprofit ventures: case study of a U.S. hybrid organization caught between two fields.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 17 (2): 137–155. doi:10.1007/s11266-006-9010-8.
  • Dart, R. 2004. “Being “Business-like” in a nonprofit organization: a grounded and inductive typology.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33 (2): 290–310. doi:10.1177/0899764004263522.
  • Desmidt, S., and K. Meyfroodt. 2020. “What motivates politicians to use strategic plans as a decision-making tool? Insights from the theory of planned behaviour.” Public Management Review 1–28.
  • Desmidt, S., K. Meyfroodt, and B. George. 2018. “Shared strategic cognition in Flemish city councils.” Public Management Review: An International Journal of Research and Theory.
  • Dey, P., and S. Teasdale. 2016. “The tactical mimicry of social enterprise strategies: acting ‘as if’in the everyday life of third sector organizations.” Organization 23 (4): 485–504. doi:10.1177/1350508415570689.
  • Diefenbach, T. 2009. “New public management in public sector organizations: the dark sides of managerialistic ‘enlightenment’.” Public Administration 87 (4): 892–909. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01766.x.
  • Eikenberry, Kluver, A. M. Eikenberry, and J. D. Kluver. 2004. “The marketization of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk?” Public Administration Review 64 (2): 132–140. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x.
  • Enticott, G., G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker. 2009. “The use of multiple informants in public administration research: data aggregation using organizational echelons.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (2): 229–253. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun017.
  • Froelich, K. A. 2012. “Hospice of the red river valley: a nonprofit’s response to for-profit competition.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 23 (2): 237–257. doi:10.1002/nml.21044.
  • Gallet, W., M. Hansen, and Lindholst. 2016. “Marketized employment services the impact on Christian-based service providers and their clients.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (5): 426–440. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-02-2016-0033.
  • George, B., S. Desmidt, P. A. Nielsen, and M. Baekgaard. 2017. “Rational planning and politicians’ preferences for spending and reform: replication and extension of a survey experiment.” Public Management Review 19 (9): 1251–1271. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1210905.
  • George, B., A. Drumaux, P. Joyce, and F. Longo. 2020. “Editorial.” Public Money & Management 40 (4): 255–259. doi:10.1080/09540962.2020.1728055.
  • George, B., and S. K. Pandey. 2017. “We know the yin—but where is the yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 37 (2): 245–270. doi:10.1177/0734371X17698189.
  • George, B., S. Van de Walle, and G. Hammerschmid. 2019. “Institutions or contingencies? A cross‐country analysis of management tool use by public sector executives.” Public Administration Review 79 (3): 330–342. doi:10.1111/puar.13018.
  • George, B., R. M. Walker, and J. Monster. 2019. “Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta‐analysis.” Public Administration Review 79 (6): 810–819. doi:10.1111/puar.13104.
  • Gerrish, E. 2016. “The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: a meta‐analysis.” Public Administration Review 76 (1): 48–66. doi:10.1111/puar.12433.
  • Greiling, D., and S. Stötzer. 2015. “Performance accountability as a driver for changes in nonprofit–government relationships: an empirical insight from Austria.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26 (5): 1690–1717. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9609-8.
  • Hair, Black, Babin, and Anderson. 2010. Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. inter alia 7. global ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
  • Hayes, A. F. 2017. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
  • Herman, R. D., and D. O. Renz. 1999. “Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28 (2): 107–126. doi:10.1177/0899764099282001.
  • Hood, C. 1991. “A public management for all seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
  • Hustinx, L., and E. De Waele. 2015. “Managing hybridity in a changing welfare mix: everyday practices in an entrepreneurial nonprofit in Belgium.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26 (5): 1666–1689. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9625-8.
  • Hvenmark, and J. Hvenmark. 2013. “Business as usual? On managerialization and the adoption of the balanced scorecard in a democratically governed civil society organization.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 35 (2): 223–247. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806350203.
  • Hvenmark, and J. Hvenmark. 2016. “Ideology, practice, and process? A review of the concept of managerialism in civil society studies.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 27 (6): 2833–2859. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9605-z.
  • Julnes, P. D. L., and M. Holzer. 2001. “Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: an empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation.” Public Administration Review 61 (6): 693–708. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00140.
  • Kim, M., C. Charles, and S. L. Pettijohn. 2019. “Challenges in the use of performance data in management: results of a national survey of human service nonprofit organizations.” Public Performance & Management Review 42 (5): 1085–1111. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1523107.
  • Kong, E. 2008. “The development of strategic management in the non‐profit context: intellectual capital in social service non‐profit organizations.” International Journal of Management Reviews 10 (3): 281–299.
  • Kreutzer, K., and U. Jäger. 2011. “Volunteering versus managerialism: conflict over organizational identity in voluntary associations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40 (4): 634–661. doi:10.1177/0899764010369386.
  • Kushner, R. J., and P. P. Poole. 1996. “Exploring structure‐effectiveness relationships in nonprofit arts organizations.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 7 (2): 119–136. doi:10.1002/nml.4130070203.
  • Lægreid, P., P. G. Roness, and K. Rubecksen. 2007. “Modern management tools in state agencies: the case of Norway.” International Public Management Journal 10 (4): 387–413. doi:10.1080/10967490701683586.
  • Lall, and S. Lall. 2017. “Measuring to improve versus measuring to prove: understanding the adoption of social performance measurement practices in nascent social enterprises.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28 (6): 2633–2657. doi:10.1007/s11266-017-9898-1.
  • Lall, and S. A. Lall. 2019. “From Legitimacy to Learning: How Impact Measurement Perceptions and Practices Evolve in Social Enterprise–Social Finance Organization Relationships.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 30 (3): 562–577. doi:10.1007/s11266-018-00081-5.
  • Lee, Benoit-Bryan, Johnson, G. Lee, J. Benoit‐Bryan, and T. P. Johnson. 2012. “Survey research in public administration: assessing mainstream journals with a total survey error framework.” Public Administration Review 72 (1): 87–97. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02482.x.
  • Lee, and C. Lee. 2020. “Understanding the diverse purposes of performance information use in nonprofits: an empirical study of factors influencing the use of performance measures.” Public Performance & Management Review 43 (1): 81–108. doi:10.1080/15309576.2019.1596136.
  • LeRoux, K., and N. S. Wright. 2010. “Does performance measurement improve strategic decision making? Findings from a national survey of nonprofit social service agencies.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39 (4): 571–587. doi:10.1177/0899764009359942.
  • Liu, G., S. Takeda, and -W.-W. Ko. 2014. “Strategic orientation and social enterprise performance.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43 (3): 480–501. doi:10.1177/0899764012468629.
  • Maier, Schober, Simsa, Millner, F. Maier, C. Schober, R. Simsa, and R. Millner. 2015. “SROI as a method for evaluation research: understanding merits and limitations.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26 (5): 1805–1830. doi:10.1007/s11266-014-9490-x.
  • Martin, L. L. 2005. “Performance-based contracting for human services: does it work?” Administration in Social Work 29 (1): 63–77. doi:10.1300/J147v29n01_05.
  • Meyfroodt, K., and S. Desmidt. 2020. “Can rational planning stimulate cooperative behaviour? How perceived self-efficacy mediates the relationship between strategic plan use, performance information use and strategic voice by local councillors.” Public Management Review 1–25. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1699949.
  • Mitchell, G. E., and H. P. Schmitz. 2019. “The nexus of public and nonprofit management.” Public Performance & Management Review 42 (1): 11–33. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1489293.
  • Moody, M., L. Littlepage, and N. Paydar. 2015. “Measuring social return on investment: lessons from organizational implementation of SROI in the Netherlands and the United States.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 26 (1): 19–37. doi:10.1002/nml.21145.
  • Mook, L., J. Maiorano, S. Ryan, A. Armstrong, and J. Quarter. 2015. “Turning social return on investment on its head: the stakeholder impact statement.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 26 (2): 229–246. doi:10.1002/nml.21184.
  • Moore, M. H. 2000. “Managing for value: organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organizations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 29 (1_suppl): 183–204. doi:10.1177/0899764000291S009.
  • Moynihan, D. P. 2005. “Goal‐based learning and the future of performance management.” Public Administration Review 65 (2): 203–216. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00445.x.
  • Moynihan, D. P., S. K. Pandey, and B. E. Wright. 2012. “Prosocial values and performance management theory: linking perceived social impact and performance information use.” Governance 25 (3): 463–483. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01583.x.
  • Nicholls, A. 2009. “‘We do good things, don’t we?’:‘blended value accounting’in social entrepreneurship.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (6–7): 755–769. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.008.
  • Osborne, S. P. 2006. “The new public governance?” 1.
  • Pandey, S. K., and J. M. Johnson. 2019. “Nonprofit management, public administration, and public policy: separate, subset, or intersectional domains of inquiry?” Public Performance & Management Review 42 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1557382.
  • Pauly, R., B. Suykens, B. Verschuere, and F. De Rynck 2020a. “Tussen regels en praktijken in de sociale economie.” Overheid en middenveld in interactie.
  • Pauly, R., B. Verschuere, F. De Rynck, and J. Voets. 2020b. “Changing neo-corporatist institutions? Examining the relationship between government and civil society organizations in Belgium.” Public Management Review 1–22. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1722209.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2012. “Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.” Annual Review of Psychology 63 (1): 539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
  • Poister, T. H. 2010. “The future of strategic planning in the public sector: linking strategic management and performance.” Public Administration Review 70: s246–s254. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02284.x.
  • Poister, T. H., O. Q. Pasha, and L. H. Edwards. 2013. “Does performance management lead to better outcomes? Evidence from the US public transit industry.” Public Administration Review 73 (4): 625–636. doi:10.1111/puar.12076.
  • Pornprasertmanit, S., P. Miller, A. Schoemann, and Y. Rosseel. 2013. “semTools: useful tools for structural equation modeling.” R Package Available on CRAN.
  • Rosenbloom, D. H. 2007. “Reinventing administrative prescriptions: the case for democratic-constitutional impact statements and scorecards.” Public Administration Review 67 (1): 28–39. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00694.x.
  • Rosseel, Y. 2011. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more (Version 0. 4-10 BETA).
  • Salamon. 1993. “The marketization of welfare: changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state.” The Social Service Review 67 (1): 16–39. doi:10.1086/603963.
  • Salamon, Anheier, L. M. Salamon, and H. K. Anheier. 1998. “Social origins of civil society: explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 9 (3): 213–248. doi:10.1023/A:1022058200985.
  • Salamon, & Sokolowski. 2016. Beyond nonprofits: Re-conceptualizing the third sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27 (4), 1515–1545.
  • Singh, S., T. K. Darwish, and K. Potočnik. 2016. “Measuring organizational performance: a case for subjective measures.” British Journal of Management 27 (1): 214–224. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12126.
  • Sowa, J. E., S. C. Selden, and J. R. Sandfort. 2004. “No longer unmeasurable? A multidimensional integrated model of nonprofit organizational effectiveness.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33 (4): 711–728. doi:10.1177/0899764004269146.
  • Suykens, B., F. De Rynck, and B. Verschuere. 2019. “Nonprofit organizations in between the nonprofit and market spheres: shifting goals, Governance and management?” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 29 (4): 623–636. doi:10.1002/nml.21347.
  • Suykens, B., F. De Rynck, and B. Verschuere. 2020. Examining the Extent and Coherence of Nonprofit Hybridization Toward the Market in a Post-corporatist Welfare State. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 0(0), 0899764020908344. doi:10.1177/0899764020908344.
  • Suykens, B., B. George, F. De Rynck, and B. Verschuere. 2020. “Determinants of non-profit commercialism. Resource deficits, institutional pressures or organizational contingencies?” Public Management Review 1–23. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1764083.
  • Tenbensel, T., J. Dwyer, and J. Lavoie. 2014. “How not to kill the golden goose: reconceptualizing accountability environments of third-sector organizations.” Public Management Review 16 (7): 925–944. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.770054.
  • Tummers, L., V. Bekkers, and B. Steijn. 2009. “Policy alienation of public professionals.” Public Management Review: An International Journal of Research and Theory 11 (5): 1–20. doi:10.1080/14719030902798230.
  • Verschuere, B., and B. Suykens. 2020. “Effectiveness and efficiency of nonprofit organizations.” In International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. Springer.
  • Walker, R. M., and R. Andrews. 2013. “Local government management and performance: a review of evidence.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (1): 101–133. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut038.
  • Walker, R. M., and G. Enticott. 2004. “Using multiple informants in public administration: revisiting the managerial values and actions debate.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (3): 417–434. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh022.
  • Wichowsky, A., and D. P. Moynihan. 2008. “Measuring how administration shapes citizenship: a policy feedback perspective on performance management.” Public Administration Review 68 (5): 908–920. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00931.x.
  • Willems, J., S. Boenigk, and M. Jegers. 2014. “Seven Trade-offs in measuring nonprofit performance and effectiveness.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 25 (6): 1648–1670. doi:10.1007/s11266-014-9446-1.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.