The many shapes and sizes of meta-governance. An empirical study of strategies applied by a well-advanced meta-governor: the case of Dutch central government in education

References

• Bell, S., and A. Park. 2006. “The Problematic Meta-Governance of Networks: Water Reform in New South Wales.” Journal of Public Policy 26 (1): 63–83. doi:10.1017/S0143814X06000432.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid, eds. 2007. Transcending New Public Management the Transformation of Public Sector Reforms. Alsderhot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Damgaard, B., and J. Torfing. 2010. “Network Governance of Active Employment Policy: The Danish Experience.” Journal of European Social Policy 20 (3): 248–262. doi:10.1177/0958928710364435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, J. H. 2019. “Contrasting Governance Learning Processes of Climate-leading and-lagging Cities: Portland, Oregon, and Phoenix, Arizona, USA.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 (1): 16–29. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2018.1487280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjaltema, J., R. Biesbroek, and K. Termeer. 2019. “From Government to Go Governance … To Meta-Governance: A Systematic Literature Review.” Public Management Review. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1648697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, J., E. Speed, P. Allen, I. McDermott, A. Coleman, and K. Checkland. 2019. “Autonomy, Accountability, and Ambiguity in Arm’s-Length Meta-Governance: The Case of NHS England.” Public Management Review 21 (8): 1148–1169. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1544660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanf, K., and F. W. Scharpf, eds. 1978. Inter-organisational Policy Making. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hooge, E. H. 2013. Over de mythe van bestuurbare onderwijsorganisaties. Tilburg: TIAS, Tilburg University
   Google Scholar
• Hooge, E. H. 2017. “Freedom of Education as an Interplay of Forces”. In The Dutch Way in Education. Teach, learn & lead the Dutch Way, edited by J. Heijmans and J. Christans, 31–43. Helmond: De Brink Foundation, Onderwijs Maak je Samen
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1998. “The Rise of Governance and the Risk of Failure: The Case of Economic Development.” International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 29–46. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00107.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M., E. H. Klijn, and J. F. M. Koppenjan, eds. 1997. Managing Complex Networks. London: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H. 2008. “Governance and Governance Networks in Europe: An Assessment of Ten Years of Research on the Theme.” Public Management Review 10 (4): 505–525. doi:10.1080/14719030802263954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., and J. F. M. Koppenjan. 2000. “Public Management and Policy Networks: Foundations of a Network Approach to Governance.” Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory 2 (2): 135–158. doi:10.1080/14719030000000007.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., and J. F. M. Koppenjan. 2006. “Institutional Design. Changing Institutional Features of Networks.” Public Management Review 8 (1): 141–160. doi:10.1080/14719030500518915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., and J. F. M. Koppenjan. 2016. Governance Networks in the Public Sector. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J., ed. 1993. Modern Governance: New Government-society Interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. 2003. Governing as Governance. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lecy, J. D., I. A. Mergel, and H. P. Schmitz. 2014. “Networks in Public Administration: Current Scholarship in Review.” Public Management Review 16 (5): 643–665. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.743577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoux, G., E. Eck, I. M. C. C. Heemskerk, A. M. Veen, and H. W. Sligte. 2014. Impact van de Commissie Dijsselbloem op onderwijsbeleid. Amsterdam: Kohnstamm Instituut.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, B., and R. Mayntz. 1991. Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag; Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and R. A. W. Rhodes. 1992. Policy Networks in British Government. New York: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, D. A., and P. A. Sabatier. 1979. “The Conditions of Effective Implementation: A Guide to Accomplishing Policy Objectives.” Policy Analysis 5 (4): 481–504.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meadows, L. M., and J. M. Morse. 2001. “Constructing Evidence within the Qualitative Project.” In The Nature of Qualitative Evidence, edited by J. M. Morse, J. Swanson, and A. J. Kuzel, 187–200. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Meuleman, L. 2008. Public Management and the Meta-Governance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets. The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. 2000. “Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 263–288. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Figure D6.1. and Table D6.1. doi:10.1787/eag-2018-36-en.
   Google Scholar
• Ottens, M., and J. Edelenbos. 2019. “Political Leadership as Meta-Governance in Sustainability Transitions: A Case Study Analysis of Meta-Governance in the Case of Dutch National Agreement on Climate.” Sustainability 11 (110): 2–23. doi:10.3390/su11010110.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. 2019. “The Role of Governance Modes and Meta-Governance in the Transformation Towards Sustainable Water Governance.” Environmental Science & Policy 91: 6–16. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and B. G. Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Qvist, M. 2017. “Meta-Governance and Network Formation in Collaborative Spaces of Uncertainty: The Case of Swedish Refugee Integration Policy.” Public Administration 95 (2): 498–511. doi:10.1111/padm.12310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1997. Understanding Governance. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 2007. “Understanding Governance: Ten Years On.” Organization Studies 28 (8): 1243–1264. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing, eds. 2007. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2009. “Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic through Meta-Governance.” Public Administration 87 (2): 234–258. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temmerman, C., F. De Rynck, and J. Voets. 2015. “Opening the Black Box of Meta-Governance: The Roles of Central Government in Local Multilevel Networks – The Case of the Local Job Centers in Flanders.” International Review of Public Administration 20 (3): 227–242. doi:10.1080/12294659.2015.1039777.
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. 1998. “Policy Instruments: Tyopologies and Theories.” In Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. 1 vols. edited by M. L. Bemelmans-Videc, R. C. Rist, and E. O. Vedung, 21–58. London: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. E., T. H. Morrison, and J.-A. Everingham. 2017. “Steering Social Outcomes in America’s Heartland: State and Private Mega-Governance in the Marcellus Shale, Pennsylvania.” American Review of Public Administration 47 (8): 929–944. doi:10.1177/02750740/6654012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. E., T. H. Morrison, and J.-A. Everingham. 2018. “Multi-Scale Meta-Governance Strategies for Addressing Social Inequality in Resource Dependent Regions.” Sociologia Ruralis 58 (3): 500–552. doi:10.1111/soru.12189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar