Social entrepreneurs as change makers: expanding public service networks for social innovation

References

• Agger, A., and D. L. Hedensted. 2017. “Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector: New Perspectives on the Role of Citizens?” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 21 (3): 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ayob, N., S. Teasdale, and K. Fagan. 2016. “How Social Innovation ‘Came to Be’: Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept.” Journal of Social Policy 45 (4): 635–653. doi:10.1017/S004727941600009X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barinaga, E. 2012. “Overcoming Inertia: The Social Question in Social Entrepreneurship.” In Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship, edited by D. Hjorth, 242–256. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., P. Hart, and J. Torfing. 2017. “Public Value Creation through Collaborative Innovation.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 655–669. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarchelier, B., F. Djellal, and F. Gallouj. 2020a. “Towards A Servitization of Innovation Networks: A Mapping.” Public Management Review 22 (9): 1368–1397. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1637012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmarchelier, B., F. Djellal, and F. Gallouj. 2020b. “Public Service Innovation Networks (Psins): An Instrument for Collaborative Innovation and Value Co-Creation in Public Service(s).” European Review of Service Economics and Management 2020-2 (10): 133–169.
   Google Scholar
• Djellal, F., and F. Gallouj. 2018. “Fifteen Challenges for Service Innovation Studies.” In A Research Agenda for Service Innovation, edited by F. Gallouj and F. Djellal, 1–25. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkovitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. “The Dynamics of Innovation from National Systems and ‘Mode 2ʹ to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations.” Research Policy 29: 109–123. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglsang, L., A. V. Hansen, and A. Scupola. 2019. “Danish Case-Studies Report: Case Study Report. Case Studies WP6: Denmark.” In Empirical Approach to Value Co-Creation in Public Services: Structural Transformations: EU-H2020 Co-VAL, Deliverable 6.1, edited by C. Merlin-Brogniart, 197–285. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gallouj, F., L. Rubalcaba, M. Toivonen, and P. Windrum. 2018. “Understanding Social Innovation in Services Industries.” Industry and Innovation 25 (6): 551–569. doi:10.1080/13662716.2017.1419124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, B. 2015. Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation over the Centuries. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. 1976. “History and Significance of the EMIC/ETIC Distinction.” Annual Review of Anthropology 5: 329–350. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.05.100176.001553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulgård, L., and L. L. Andersen. 2019. “Reconfiguring the Social and Solidarity Economy in a Danish/Nordic Welfare Context.” In Theory of Social Enterprise and Pluralism: Social Movements, Solidarity Economy, and the Global South, edited by P. Eynaud, J. Laville, L. dos Santos, S. Banerjee, F. Avelino, and L. Hulgård, 69–90. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keast, R., K. Brown, and M. Mandell. 2007. “Getting the Right Mix: Unpacking Integration Meanings and Strategies.” International Public Management Journal 10 (1): 9–33. doi:10.1080/10967490601185716.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G., G. Mulgan, and S. Muers. 2002. Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform. London: Cabinet Office Strategy Unit, United Kingdom Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. 2009. “The Alert and Creative Entrepreneur: A Clarification.” Small Business Economics 32: 145–152. doi:10.1007/s11187-008-9153-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lortie, J., and K. C. Cox. 2018. “On the Boundaries of Social Entrepreneurship: A Review of Relationships with Related Research Domains.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 14 (3): 639–648. doi:10.1007/s11365-018-0514-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2015. “Twenty Challenges for Innovation Studies.” Working paper SWPS 2015-30, SPRU Working Paper Series. University of Sussex Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. 2018. “Open Innovation in the Public Sector: Drivers and Barriers for the Adoption of Challenge.gov.” Public Management Review 20 (5): 726–745. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1320044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, A. W., P. A. Dacin, and M. T. Dacin. 2012. “Collective Social Entrepreneurship: Collaboratively Shaping Social Good.” Journal of Business Ethics 11 (3): 375–388. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1501-5.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, T. 2016. “Are Social Innovation Paradigms Incommensurable?” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 27 (4): 1979–2000. doi:10.1007/s11266-016-9688-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., and D. MacCallum. 2019. Advanced Introduction to Social Innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., S. Tucker, R. Ali, and B. Sanders. 2007. Social Innovation: What Is It, Why It Matters and How It Can Be Accelerated. London: Young Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., ed. 2010. The New Public Governance? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., S. P. Osborne, and T. Brandsen. 2006. “Patterns of Co-Production in Public Services: Some Concluding Thoughts.” Public Management Review 8 (4): 591–595. doi:10.1080/14719030601022999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancino, A., J. Rees, and I. Schindele. 2018. “Cross-Sector Collaboration for Public Value Co-Creation: A Critical Analysis.” In From Austerity to Abundance? Creative Approaches to Coordinating the Common Good, edited by M. Stout, 59–73. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1934 (1912). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot [The Theory of Economic Development]. Translated by X. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2006. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2013. “Enhancing Social Innovation by Rethinking Collaboration, Leadership and Public Governance.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of NESTA Social Frontiers. London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, S., M. J. Roy, R. Ziegler, S. Mauksch, P. Dey, and E. B. Raufflet. 2020. “Everyone a Changemaker? Exploring the Moral Underpinnings of Social Innovation Discourse through Real Utopias.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship ahead-of-print: 1–21. doi:10.1080/19420676.2020.1738532.
   Google Scholar
• TEPSIE. 2015. Doing Social Innovation: A Guide for Practitioners. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2019. “Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector: The Argument.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Production and Co-Creation: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windrum, P., and S. G. Winter. 1984. “Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5: 287–320. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(84)90004-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research, Design and Methods. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zeyen, A., and M. Beckmann. 2019. “What Is Social Entrepreneurship (Not)?” In Social Entrepreneurship and Business Ethics - Understanding the Contribution and Normative Ambivalence of Purpose-driven Venturing, edited by A. Zeyen and M. Beckmann, 15–35. NY and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar