Neighbourhood governance during the COVID-19 lockdown in Hangzhou: coproduction based on digital technologies

References

• Alford, J. 2002. “Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social-Exchange Perspective.” Public Administration Review 62 (3): 337–346. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J., and S. Yates. 2016. “Co-Production of Public Services in Australia: The Roles of Government Organisations and Co-Producers.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (2): 159–175. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, J. M., R. Andrews, J. Clifton, and D. Diaz-Fuentes. 2019. “Factors Influencing Citizens’ Co-Production of Environmental Outcomes: A Multi-Level Analysis.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1620–1645. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., E. Sørensen, and J. Torfing. 2021. “The COVID-19 Pandemic as a Game Changer for Public Administration and Leadership? The Need for Robust Governance Responses to Turbulent Problems.” Public Management Review 23 (7): 949–960. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, P., R. Weber, and M. Zook. 2017. “The Cloud, the Crowd, and the City: How New Data Practices Reconfigure Urban Governance?” Big Data & Society, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Bernholz, L. 2018. Philanthropy and Digital Civil Society: Blueprint 2019. Stanford: Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society (PACS).
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L., and R. E. England. 1983. “Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept.” Public Administration Review 43 (1): 59–65. doi:10.2307/975300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen, H. B., J. Toubøl, and B. Brincker. 2021. “On Solidarity and Volunteering during the COVID-19 Crisis in Denmark: The Impact of Social Networks and Social Media Groups on the Distribution of Support.” European Societies, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chaebo, G., and J. J. Medeiros. 2017. “Conditions for Policy Implementation via Co-Production: The Control of Dengue Fever in Brazil.” Public Management Review 19 (10): 1381–1398. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1209231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y (Daniel), J. Yu, Y. Shen, and B. Huang. 2020. “Coproducing Responses to COVID-19 with Community-Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China.” Public Administration Review 80 (5): 866–873. doi:10.1111/puar.13244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. Y., J. L. Brudney, and S. Jang. 2013. “Coproduction of Government Services and the New Information Technology: Investigating the Distributional Biases.” Public Administration Review 73 (5): 687–701. doi:10.1111/puar.12092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q., and N. Lin. 2014. “The Weaknesses of Civic Territorial Organizations: Civic Engagement and Homeowners Associations in Urban China.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (6): 2309–2327. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B, and J. Yu. 2019. “Leading Digital Technologies for Coproduction: The Case of ‘Visit Once’ Administrative Service Reform in Zhejiang Province, China.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 24 (3): 513–532. doi:10.1007/s11366-019-09627-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, S., and T. Nabatchi. 2018. “Co-Production, Co-Creation, and Citizen Empowerment.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Service, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 2018. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, P. S. 2020. “South Korea’s Fast Response to Coronavirus Disease: Implications on Public Policy and Public Management Theory.” Public Management Review 1–12. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1766266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lember, V. 2018. “The Increasing Role of Digital Technologies in Co-Production and Co-Creation.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Service, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 2018. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lember, V., T. Brandsen, and P. Tõnurist. 2019. “The Potential Impacts of Digital Technologies on Co-Production and Co-Creation.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1665–1686. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, C. H., and G. Fisher. 1984. “Citizenship and Service Delivery: The Promise of Coproduction.” Public Administration Review 44: 178–189. doi:10.2307/975559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. 2020. “Communication for Coproduction: Increasing Information Credibility to Fight the Coronavirus.” The American Review of Public Administration 50 (6–7): 692–697. doi:10.1177/0275074020942104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. 2011. “Networked Coproduction of Public Services in Virtual Communities: From a Government-Centric to a Community Approach to Public Service Support.” Public Administration Review 71 (4): 598–607. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02391.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. 2016. “Coproduction as a Structural Transformation of the Public Sector.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (6): 596–611. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-01-2016-0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., A. Sancino, and M. Sicilia. 2017. “Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction.” Public Administration Review 77 (5): 766–776. doi:10.1111/puar.12765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, J. 2021. “Confronting the Big Challenges of Our Time: Making a Difference during and after COVID-19.” Public Management Review 23 (7): 961–980. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2020.1820273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., and S. V. Scott. 2016. “Digital Work: A Research Agenda.” In A Research Agenda for Management and Organization Studies, edited by B. Czarniawska, 88–96. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Z. Radnor, and K. Strokosch. 2016. “Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment?” Public Management Review 18 (5): 639–653. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., and E. Ostrom. 1977. Public Goods and Public Choices. In Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance. Edited by Emanuel S. Savas. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poocharoen, O. O., and B. Ting. 2015. “Collaboration, Co-Production, Networks: Convergence of Theories.” Public Management Review 17 (4): 587–614. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.866479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., and A. Hanser. 2021. “How Did Wuhan Residents Cope with a 76-Day Lockdown?” Chinese Sociological Review 53 (1): 55–86. doi: 10.1080/21620555.2020.1820319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. B. 1980. “Toward a New Understanding of Urban Services and Citizen Participation: The Coproduction Concept.” Midwest Review of Public Administration 14 (2): 105–118. doi:10.1177/027507408001400203.
   Google Scholar
• Vanleene, D., and B. Verschuere. 2018. “Definition of Co-Production and Co-Creation.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Service, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 2018. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W, V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Coproduction: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, X. 2016. “Governmentalities in Everyday Practices: The Dynamic of Urban Neighbourhood Governance in China.” Urban Studies 53 (11): 2330–2346. doi:10.1177/0042098015589884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh, W., and G. Streib. 2006. “Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management.” Public Administration Review 66: 131–140. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00673.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. N., S. C. Kang, and J. Johnson. 2016. “(Co)-Contamination as the Dark Side of Co-Production: Public Value Failures in Co-Production Processes.” Public Management Review 18 (5): 692–717. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K. 2020. “Unprecedented Challenges, Familiar Paradoxes: COVID-19 and Governance in a New Normal State of Risks.” Public Administration Review 80 (4): 657–664. doi:10.1111/puar.13248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, T., and Z. Wu. 2020. “Citizen-State Collaboration in Combating COVID-19 in China: Experiences and Lessons from the Perspective of Co-Production.” The American Review of Public Administration 50 (6–7): 777–783. doi:10.1177/0275074020942455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W. and Y. Zou. 2021. “Smart Urban Governance in Epidemic Control: Practices and Implications of Hangzhou.” Chinese Public Administration Review (Online First) 1–10. doi:10.22140/cpar.v0i0.238
   Google Scholar