Exploring user co-regulation of public services: insights from the Grenoble water user committee

References

• Ackerman, John. 2004. “Co-Governance for Accountability: Beyond ‘Exit’ and ‘Voice’.” World Development 32 (3): 447–463. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, Frank G. A. de, F. Den Hond, B. King, and K. Weber. 2013. “Social Movements, Civil Society and Corporations: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead.” Organization Studies 34 (5–6): 573–593. doi:10.1177/0170840613479222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Sören, Thomas Blanchet, and Conrad Kunze. 2016. “Social Movements and Urban Energy Policy: Assessing Contexts, Agency and Outcomes of Remunicipalisation Processes in Hamburg and Berlin.” Utilities Policy 41: 228–236. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendell, Jem. 2000. “Civil Regulation: A New Form of Democratic Governance for the Global Economy?” In Terms for Endearment: Business, NGOs and Sustainable Development, edited by Jem Bendell, 239–254. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
   Google Scholar
• Best, Bernadette, Sandra Moffett, and R. McAdam. 2019. “Stakeholder Salience in Public Sector Value Co-creation.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1707–1732. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchet, Thomas. 2016. “A Partial Privatization under Pressure: The Berlin Water Company.” In Water Regimes: Beyond the Public and Private Sector Debate, edited by Dominique Lorrain, and Frank Poupeau, 93–106. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchet, Thomas, and Carsten Herzberg. 2017. “Étude sur la gouvernance et l’organisation des services d’eau potable retournés en gestion publique en France (2000-2016)”. LATTS Working Paper, 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, Tony. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, Tony, and Elke Loeffler. 2012. “From Engagement to Co-Production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value.” Voluntas 23 (4): 1119–1138. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, Tony, and Elke Loeffler. 2013. “We’re All in This Together: Harnessing User and Community Co-production of Public Outcomes.” Institute of Local Government Studies: University of Birmingham: 15.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, Tony, Gerry Stoker, Tricia Jones, Elke Loeffler, and Monica Pinilla Roncancio. 2016. “Activating Collective Co-Production of Public Services: Influencing Citizens to Participate in Complex Governance Mechanisms in the UK.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 47–68. doi:10.1177/0020852314566009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridget, Hutter. 2006. “The Role of Non State Actors in Regulation.” CARR Discussion Paper 37. Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science, London. Available from URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CARR/pdf/Disspaper37.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Byatt, Ian. 2013. “The Regulation of Water Services in the UK.” Utilities Policy 24: 3–10. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2012.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrò, Andrea. 2012. “Co-Production: An Alternative to the Partial Privatization Processes in Italy and Norway.” In New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, edited by Victor A. Pestoff, Taco Brandsen, and Bram Verschuere, 317–336. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Downe, James, and Steve Martin. 2007. “Regulation inside Government: Processes and Impacts of Inspection of Local Public Services.” Policy and Politics 35 (2): 215–232. doi:10.1332/030557307780712997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudau, Adina, Russ Glennon, and Bram Verschuere. 2019. “Following the Yellow Brick road?(Dis) Enchantment with Co-design, Co-production and Value Co-creation in Public Services.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1577–1594. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1653604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Eau Secours, Information Letter, September” 1996, retrieved from http://eausecours.free.fr/lettrees/1996-09-LettreEauSecours.pdf
   Google Scholar
• “Eau Secours, Information Letter, October” 1997, retrieved from http://eausecours.free.fr/lettrees/1997-10-LettreEauSecours.pdf
   Google Scholar
• “Eau Secours, Information Letter, April” 1998, retrieved from http://eausecours.free.fr/lettrees/1998-04-LettreEauSecours.pdf
   Google Scholar
• “Eau Secours, Information Letter, September” 1999, retrieved from http://eausecours.free.fr/lettrees/1999-09-LettreEauSecours.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550. doi:10.2307/258557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Erik M. 2019. “Representative Co-production: Broadening the Scope of the Public Service Logic.” Public Management Review 21 (2): 291–314. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1487575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch, Kimberly. 2007. “Water Privatisation in France and Germany: The Importance of Local Interest Groups.” Local Government Studies 33 (4): 589–605. doi:10.1080/03003930701417627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, Archon, and Erik Olin Wright. 2005. “Le Contre-Pouvoir Dans La Démocratie Participative et Déliberative.” In Gestion de Proximité et Démocratie Participative: Une Perspective Comparative, edited by Marie-Hélène Bacqué, Henri Rey, and Yves Sintomer, 49–80. Paris: Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Herzberg, Carsten. 2015. Legitimation durch Beteiligung: Stadt- und Wasserwerke in Deutschland und Frankreich. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Seung-Hun, and Jong-sung You. 2018. “Limits of Regulatory Responsiveness: Democratic Credentials of Responsive Regulation.” Regulation & Governance 12 (3): 413–427. doi:10.1111/rego.12193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher, Henry Rothstein, and Robert Baldwin. 2001. The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford: OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher, James r Oliver, Scott Colin, Jones George, and Travers Tony. 1999. Regulation inside Government: Waste Watchers, Quality Police, and Sleaze-busters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher, Oliver James, and Colin Scott. 2000. “Regulation in Government: Has It Increased, Is It Increasing, and Should It Be Diminished?” Public Administration 78 (2): 284–304. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, Kerstin. 2004. “Soft Regulation and the Subtle Transformation of States: The Case of EU Employment Policy.” Journal of European Social Policy 14 (4): 355–370. doi:10.1177/0958928704046878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, Anuradha, and Mick Moore. 2004. “Institutionalised Co-Production: Unorthodox Public Service Delivery in Challenging Environments.” Journal of Development Studies 40 (4): 31–49. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Sinah, and Gregg G. Van Ryzin. 2019. “Coproduction and Trust in Government: Evidence from Survey Experiments.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1646–1664. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, Ann. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management review 24 (4): 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lino, Feliciano André, Busanelli de Aquino André Carlos, Rocha de Azevedo Ricardo, and Brumatti Lívia Martinez. 2019. “From Rules to Collaborative Practice: When Regulatory Mechanisms Drive Collective Co-production.” Public Money & Management 39 (4): 280–289. doi:10.1080/09540962.2019.1592909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobina, Emanuele, and David Hall. 2007. “Experience with Private Sector Participation in Grenoble, France, and Lessons on Strengthening Public Water Operations.” Utilities Policy 15 (2): 93–109. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2007.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Loeffler, Elke, and Tony Bovaird. 2016. “User and Community Co-Production of Public Services: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?” International Journal of Public Administration 39 (13): 1006–1019. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1250559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorrain, Dominique. 2016. “Water in Paris: Polity and Politics.” In Water Regimes: Beyond the Public and Private Sector Debate, edited by Dominique Lorrain and Franck Poupeau, 73–92. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, Micaela, Simon, Teasdale, Francesca Calò, and Michael J. Roy. 2020. “Co-production and the Third Sector: Conceptualising Different Approaches to Service User Involvement.” Public Management Review 22 (9): 1265–1283. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1630135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, Jeremy, and David Vogel. 2008. “Corporate Social Responsibility, Government and Civil Society.” In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, edited by Andrew Crane, Abagail McWilliams, Dirk Matten, Jeremy Moon, and Donald Siegel, 303–323. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, Peter. 2008. “Civil Society, Corporate Accountability and the Politics of Climate Change.” Global Environmental Politics 8 (3): 122–153. doi:10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, Stephen P. 2018. “From Public Service-dominant Logic to Public Service Logic: Are Public Service Organizations Capable of Co-production and Value Co-creation?“ Public Management Review 20(2): 225–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, Stephen P, Zoe Radnor, and Kirsty Strokosch. 2016. “Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment?” Public Management Review 18 (5): 639–653. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflieger, Géraldine. 2001. “Les Associations D’usagers de L’eau.” Annales de La Recherche Urbaine 89 (1): 150–153. doi:10.3406/aru.2001.2393.
   Google Scholar
• Pflieger, Géraldine. 2002. “Domination Du Consommateur et Résistance Du Citoyen.” Flux 48-49 (2): 20–34. doi:10.3917/flux.048.0020.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, Paul. 2011. “The Citizen in Regulation.” Final Report Cambridge Centre for Housing and Planning Research: Cambridge. Available from URL: https://www.cchpr.landecon.cam.ac.uk/Projects/Start-Year/2011/The-Citizen-in-Regulation/Final-Report
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Colin. 2009. “Standard-Setting in Regulatory Regimes.” University College Dublin Law Research Paper No. 07/2009. Dublin. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1393647
   Google Scholar
• Senden, Linda. 2005. “Soft Law, Self-Regulation and Co-Regulation in European Law: Where Do They Meet?” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 9 (1): 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sicilia, Maria francesca, Enrico Guarini, Alessandro Sancino, Martino Andreani, and Renato Ruffini. 2016. “Public Services Management and Co-production in Multi-level Governance Settings.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 8–27. doi:10.1177/0020852314566008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steurer, Reinhard. 2013. “Disentangling Governance: A Synoptic View of Regulation by Government, Business and Civil Society.” Policy Sciences 46 (4): 387–410. doi:10.1007/s11077-013-9177-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straussman, Jeffrey D. 2020. “Co-production at the Front Line: A User Reflection on Theory and Practice.” Public Management Review 1–7. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1784635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavory, Iddo, & Timmermans, Stefan. 2014. Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trischler, Jakob, Timo Dietrich, and Sharyn Rundle-Thiele. 2019. “Co-design: From Expert-to User-driven Ideas in Public Service Design.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1595–1619. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, X. 2016. Conditions for the co-production of new immigrant services in Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Administration 39(13): 1067–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vianney, Da Costa, Etienne Jobard, Jacques Marquay, Marie Ollagnon, Béatrice Plat, and Stéphane Radureau. 2015. “Les Services Publics D’eau et D’assainissement En France. Données Économiques, Sociales et Environnementales.” Paris: FP2E/BIPE.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. 2008. Private global business regulation. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci 11: 261–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, David. 2005. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, David. 2010. “The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct: Achievements and Limitations.” Business & Society 49 (1): 68–87. doi:10.1177/0007650309343407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, Williams, Viktor Bekkers, and Lars Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-creation and Co-production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Steve, Brian Abbott, and E. Edmund Heery. 2011a. “Civil Regulation and HRM: The Impact of Civil Society Organisations on the Policies and Practices of Employers.” Human Resource Management 21 (1): 45–59. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00134.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Steve, Brian Abbott, and Edmund Heery. 2017. “Civil Governance in Work and Employment Relations: How Civil Society Organizations Contribute to Systems of Labour Governance.” Journal of Business Ethics 144 (1): 103–119. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2812-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Steve, Edmund Heery, and Brian Abbott. 2011b. “The Emerging Regime of Civil Regulation in Work and Employment Relations.” Human Relations 64 (7): 951–970. doi:10.1177/0018726710391687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert. 2013. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th Edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Zadek, Simon. 2007. The Civil Corporation (2nd Edition). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar