2,883
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

From recovery resilience to transformative resilience: How digital platforms reshape public service provision during and post COVID-19

, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2018. “Collaborative Platforms as a Governance Strategy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (1): 16–32. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux030.
  • Ansell, C., and J. Torfing. 2015. “How Does Collaborative Governance Scale?” Policy & Politics 43 (3): 315–329. doi:10.1332/030557315X14353344872935.
  • Ansell, C., and S. Miura. 2020. “Can the Power of Platforms Be Harnessed for Governance?” Public Administration 98 (1): 261–276. doi:10.1111/padm.12636.
  • Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2021. “The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems.” Public Management Review 23 (7): 949–960.
  • Asgarkhani, M. 2005. “Digital Government and Its Effectiveness in Public Management Reform: A Local Government Perspective.” Public Management Review 7 (3): 465–487. doi:10.1080/14719030500181227.
  • Berkes, F., and H. Ross. 2012. “Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach.” Society & Natural Resources 26 (1): 5–20. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.736605.
  • Boin, A., and M. Eeten. 2013. “The Resilient Organization.” Public Management Review 15 (3): 429–445. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.769856.
  • Boin, A., and M. Lodge. 2016. “Designing Resilient Institutions for Transboundary Crisis Management: A Time for Public Administration.” Public Administration 94 (2): 289–298. doi:10.1111/padm.12264.
  • Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
  • Brown, A., J. Fishenden, M. Thompson, and W. Venters. 2017. “Appraising the Impact and Role of Platform Models and Government as a Platform (Gaap) in UK Government Public Service Reform: Towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF).” Government Information Quarterly 34 (2): 167–182. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.003.
  • Cai, C., W. Jiang, and N. Tang. 2021. “Campaign-style Crisis Regime: How China Responded to the Shock of COVID-19.” Policy Studies 1–21. doi:10.1080/01442872.2021.1883576.
  • Chelleri, L., and A. Baravikova. 2021. “Understandings of Urban Resilience Meanings and Principles across Europe.” Cities 108: 102985. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102985.
  • Chen, J., J. Pan, and Y Xu. 2016. “Sources of Authoritarian Responsiveness: A Field Experiment in China.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (2): 383–400.
  • Cheng, Y., J. Yu, Y. Shen, and B. Huang. 2020. “Coproducing Responses to COVID‐19 with Community‐Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China.” Public Administration Review 80 (5): 866–873. doi:10.1111/puar.13244.
  • Cheng, Y. 2019. “Exploring the Role of Nonprofits in Public Service Provision: Moving from Coproduction to Cogovernance.” Public Administration Review 79 (2): 203–214. doi:10.1111/puar.12970.
  • Cheng, Y. 2020. “Bridging the Great Divide: Toward a Comparative Understanding of Coproduction.” Journal of Chinese Governance 5 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1080/23812346.2019.1709325.
  • Clark, B.Y., J.L. Brudney, and S. Jang. 2013. “Coproduction of Government Services and the New Information Technology: Investigating the Distributional Biases.” Public Administration Review 73 (5): 687–701. doi:10.1111/puar.12092.
  • Cobbe, J., and E. Bietti. 2020. “Rethinking Digital Platforms for the Post-COVID-19 Era.” Accessed 10 January 2021. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/rethinking-digital-platforms-post-covid-19-era
  • De Almeida, D. R. 2021. “Civil Society Representation and Digital Accountability in Brazilian Participatory Institutions.” Journal of Chinese Governance 6 (1): 81–109. doi:10.1080/23812346.2020.1721956.
  • Dijck, J., M. van de Waal, and T. Poell. 2018. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Distelhorst, G., and Y Hou. 2017. “Constituency Service under Nondemocratic Rule: Evidence from China.” The Journal of Politics 79 (3): 1024–1040. doi:10.1086/690948.
  • Duit, A. 2016. “Resilience Thinking: Lessons for Public Administration.” Public Administration 94 (2): 364–380. doi:10.1111/padm.12182.
  • Edelmann, N., and I. Mergel. 2021. “Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations.” Administrative Sciences 11 (1): 22. doi:10.3390/admsci11010022.
  • Folke, C., S. R. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Chapin, and J. Rockström. 2010. “Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability.” Ecology and Society 15 (4): 20. doi:10.5751/ES-03610-150420.
  • Gao, X., and J. Tan. 2020. “From Web to Weber: Understanding the Case of “One-go at Most” as ICT-driven Government Reform in Contemporary China.” China Review 20 (3): 71–98.
  • Gao, X., and J. Yu. 2020. “Public Governance Mechanism in the Prevention and Control of the COVID-19: Information, Decision-making and Execution.” Journal of Chinese Governance 5 (2): 178–197. doi:10.1080/23812346.2020.1744922.
  • Gazley, B., C. LaFontant, and Y. Cheng. 2020. “Does Coproduction of Public Services Support Government’s Social Equity Goals? the Case of US State Parks.” Public Administration Review 80 (3): 349–359. doi:10.1111/puar.13161.
  • He, A., Y. Shi, and H. Liu. 2020. “Crisis Governance, Chinese Style: Distinctive Features of China’s Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Policy Design and Practice 3 (3): 242–258. doi:10.1080/25741292.2020.1799911.
  • Holling, C. S. 1973. “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.
  • Huang, B., and J. Yu. 2019. “Leading Digital Technologies for Coproduction: The Case of ‘Visit Once’ Administrative Service Reform in Zhejiang Province, China.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 24 (3): 513–532. doi:10.1007/s11366-019-09627-w.
  • Jiang, J., T. Meng, and Q. Zhang. 2019. “From Internet to Social Safety Net: The Policy Consequences of Online Participation in China.” Governance 32 (3): 531–546. doi:10.1111/gove.12391.
  • Kim, S., K.N. Andersen, and J. Lee. 2021. “Platform Government in the Era of Smart Technology.” Public Administration Review. doi:10.1111/puar.13422.
  • Klein, P. G. 2008. “Opportunity Discovery, Entrepreneurial Action, and Economic Organization.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2 (3): 175–190. doi:10.1002/sej.50.
  • Li, H. 2020. “Communication for Coproduction: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Chinese Governance 5 (1): 110–135. doi:10.1080/23812346.2019.1695711.
  • Linders, D. 2012. “From E-government to We-government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Coproduction in the Age of Social Media.” Government Information Quarterly 29 (4): 446–454. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003.
  • MacKinnon, D., and K. D. Derickson. 2013. “From resilience to resourcefulness: A critique of resilience policy and activism.” Progress in human geography 37 (2): 253–270.
  • Mansell, R. 2017. “Bits of Power: Struggling for Control of Information and Communication Networks.” Journal of the Political Economy of Communication 5 (1): 2–29.
  • Meerow, S., J. P. Newell, and M. Stults. 2016. “Defining Urban Resilience: A Review.” Landscape and Urban Planning 147 (2016): 38–49. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011.
  • Mei, C. 2020. “Policy Style, Consistency and the Effectiveness of the Policy Mix in China’s Fight against COVID-19.” Policy and Society 39 (3): 309–325. doi:10.1080/14494035.2020.1787627.
  • Migdal, J. S. 2021. “The Question of Authority.” Journal of Chinese Governance 6 (3): 333–350. doi:10.1080/23812346.2020.1796163.
  • Minard, P. 2015. “Does ICT Diffusion Increase Government Responsiveness in Autocracies? an Empirical Assessment of the Political Implications of China’s Internet.” Journal of Contemporary China 24 (96): 1048–1069. doi:10.1080/10670564.2015.1030953.
  • O’Reilly, T. 2011. “Government as a Platform.” Innovations: Technology, Governance.” Globalization 6 (1): 13–40.
  • Osborne, S.P., Z. Radnor, and K. Strokosch. 2016. “Co-production and the Co-creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment?” Public Management Review 18 (5): 639–653. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927.
  • Ostrom, E., and M. A. Janssen. 2004. “Multi-level Governance and Resilience of Social-ecological Systems.” In Spoor, M. (eds). Globalisation, Poverty and Conflict, 239–259. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-2858-X_13.
  • Poocharoen, O.O., and B. Ting. 2015. “Collaboration, Co-production, Networks: Convergence of Theories.” Public Management Review 17 (4): 587–614. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.866479.
  • Quick, K.S., and M. S. Feldman. 2014. “Boundaries as Junctures: Collaborative Boundary Work for Building Efficient Resilience.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (3): 673–695. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut085.
  • Shaw, D.R., K. Achuthan, A. Sharma, and A. Grainger. 2019. “Resilience Orchestration and Resilience Facilitation: How Government Can Orchestrate the Whole UK Ports Market with Limited Resources–the Case of UK Ports Resilience.” Government Information Quarterly 36 (2): 252–263. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.12.003.
  • Shaw, R., Y. Kim, and J. Hua. 2020. “Governance, Technology and Citizen Behavior in Pandemic: Lessons from COVID-19 in East Asia.” Progress in Disaster Science 6: 100090. doi:10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100090.
  • Steen, T., and T. Brandsen. 2020. “Coproduction during and after the COVID‐19 Pandemic: Will It Last?” Public Administration Review 80 (5): 851–855. doi:10.1111/puar.13258.
  • Su, Z., and T. Meng. 2016. “Selective Responsiveness: Online Public Demands and Government Responsiveness in Authoritarian China.” Social Science Research 59: 52–67. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.017.
  • Thornton, P. 2009. “Crisis and Governance: SARS and the Resilience of the Chinese Body Politic.” The China Journal 61: 23–48. doi:10.1086/tcj.61.20648044.
  • Toonen, T. 2010. “Resilience in Public Administration: The Work of Elinor and Vincent Ostrom from a Public Administration Perspective.” Public Administration Review 70 (2): 193–202. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02147.x.
  • Voorberg, W., S. Jilke, L. Tummers, and V. Bekkers. 2018. “Financial Rewards Do Not Stimulate Coproduction: Evidence from Two Experiments.” Public Administration Review 78 (6): 864–873. doi:10.1111/puar.12896.
  • Wang, X., and Y. Cheng. 2021. “Cross the River by Feeling the Stones: How Did Nonlocal Grassroots Nonprofits Overcome Administrative Barriers to Provide Quick Responses to COVID-19?” Public Administration and Development 41 (2): 91–98. doi:10.1002/pad.1908.
  • Xu, C. K., and T. Tang. 2020. “Closing the Gap or Widening the Divide: The Impacts of Technology‐Enabled Coproduction on Equity in Public Service Delivery.” Public Administration Review 80 (6): 962–975. doi:10.1111/puar.13222.
  • Zou, Y., and W. Zhao. 2021. “Neighbourhood governance during the COVID-19 lockdown in Hangzhou: coproduction based on digital technologies.” Public Management Review, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1945666

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.