Learning how to do AI: managing organizational boundaries in an intergovernmental learning forum

References

• Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 1998. “Multinetwork Management: Collaboration and the Hollow State in Local Economic Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (1): 67–91. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024374.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, Sanne F., and Arthur Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, Chris. 1991. “The Use of Knowledge as a Test for Theory: The Case of Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 1 (3): 337–354.
   Google Scholar
• Berends, Hans, Kees Boersma, and Mathieu Weggeman. 2003. “The Structuration of Organizational Learning.” Human Relations 56 (9): 1035–1056. doi:10.1177/0018726703569001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren, Christian, Jörg Sydow, and Fredrik Tell. 2017. “Relating Knowledge Integration and Absorptive Capacity.” In Managing Knowledge Integration across Boundaries, edited by Fredrik Tell, Christian Berggren, Stefano Brusoni, and Andrew H Van de Ven, 57–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berryhill, Jamie, Kévin Kok Heang, Rob Clogher, and Keegan McBride. 2019. “Hello, World: Artificial Intelligence and Its Use in the Public Sector.” OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation (OPSI).
   Google Scholar
• Broomfield, Heather, and Lisa Reutter. 2021. “Towards a Data-Driven Public Administration: An Empirical Analysis of Nascent Phase Implementation.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 25 (2): 73–97.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. 2015. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://books.google.no/books?hl=en&lr=&id=N2zQCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Social+Research+Methods&ots=doMrDYMbrj&sig=Nxdm9epd0MfJcaSqt_Kuu6fDW_s&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.
   Google Scholar
• Cath, Corinne. 2018. “Governing Artificial Intelligence: Ethical, Legal and Technical Opportunities and Challenges.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 376 (2133): 20180080. doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalheiro, Gabriel Marcuzzo do Canto, and Luiz Antonio Joia. 2014. “Towards a Heuristic Frame for Transferring E-Government Technology.” Government Information Quarterly 31 (1): 195–207. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Benjamin Y., and Jeffrey L. Brudney. 2021. “Too Much of a Good Thing? Frequent Flyers and the Implications for the Coproduction of Public Service Delivery.” Research Handbook on E-Government. edited by Eric W. Welch, 101–113. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781786437259.00013
   Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, Daniela, Benedetta Trivellato, and Stefano Verzillo. 2019. “Network Management as A Contingent Activity. A Configurational Analysis of Managerial Behaviors in Different Network Settings.” Public Management Review 21 (12): 1775–1800. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1577905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, Sharon S. 2008. “Measures and Conditions of Success in Public Sector Knowledge Networks.” 03–2008. CTG Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, Sharon S., Anthony M. Cresswell, and Theresa A. Pardo. 2009. “From ‘Need to Know’ to ‘Need to Share’: Tangled Problems, Information Boundaries, and the Building of Public Sector Knowledge Networks.” Public Administration Review 69 (3): 392–402. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01987_2.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, Sharon S., and Mohammed A. Gharawi. 2018. “Transnational Public Sector Knowledge Networks: A Comparative Study of Contextual Distances.” Government Information Quarterly 35 (2): 184–194. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, Joseph M., and Mark W. Mcelroy. 2004. “Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: The Relationship.” The Learning Organization 11 (2): 177–184. doi:10.1108/09696470410521628.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Nick J. 2011. “Boundary Objects, Social Meanings and the Success of New Technologies.” Sociology 45 (1): 70–85. doi:10.1177/0038038510387196.
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Study and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghiyoung, Im, and Arun Rai. 2008. “Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganizational Relationships.” Management Science 54 (7): 1281–1296. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon, Ahmet Guler, A. Pardo Theresa, and G. Brian Burke. 2019. “Characterizing the Importance of Clarity of Roles and Responsibilities in Government Inter-Organizational Collaboration and Information Sharing Initiatives.” Government Information Quarterly 36 (4): 101393. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenduez, Ali A., Tobias Mettler, and Kuno Schedler. 2020. “Technological Frames in Public Administration: What Do Public Managers Think of Big Data?” Government Information Quarterly 37 (1): 101406. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt-Taylor, Jaquelina. 2002. “Inside Knowledge: Issues in Insider Research.” Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987) 16 (46): 33–35. doi:10.7748/ns.16.46.33.s5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Justin, Bullock, Matthew M. Young, and Yi Fan Wang. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence, Bureaucratic Form, and Discretion in Public Service.” Information Polity 25 (4): 491–506. doi:10.3233/IP-200223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kate Van, Heugten. 2004. “Managing Insider Research: Learning from Experience.” Qualitative Social Work 3 (2): 203–219. doi:10.1177/1473325004043386.
   Google Scholar
• Kenneally, Adele. 2013. “The Lived Experience of Insider Action Research in a Local Government Setting.” 3rd National Local Government Research Forum. doi:10.5130/aac.f.
   Google Scholar
• Kinder, Tony, Frédérique Six, Jari Stenvall, and Ally Memon. 2020. “Governance-as-Legitimacy: Are Ecosystems Replacing Networks?” Public Management Review. 1–26. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1786149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kislov, Roman. 2014. “Boundary Discontinuity in a Constellation of Interconnected Practices.” Public Administration 92 (2): 307–323. doi:10.1111/padm.12065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuziemski, Maciej, and Gianluca Misuraca. 2020. “AI Governance in the Public Sector: Three Tales from the Frontiers of Automated Decision-Making in Democratic Settings.” Telecommunications Policy 44 (6): 101976. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, Natalia, and Emmanuelle Vaast. 2005. “The Emergence of Boundary Spanning in Practice : Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 29 (2): 335–363. doi:10.2307/25148682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Shi Ying, Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, and Holly J. Lanham. 2015. “Barriers to Interorganizational Knowledge Transfer in Post-Hospital Care Transitions: Review and Directions for Information Systems Research.” Journal of Management Information Systems 32 (3): 48–74. doi:10.1080/07421222.2015.1095013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindkvist, Lars. 2005. “Knowledge Communities and Knowledge Collectivities: A Typology of Knowledge Work in Groups.” Journal of Management Studies 42 (6): 1189–1210. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00538.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marc, Marheineke, Vivek K. Velamuri, and Kathrin M. Möslein. 2016. “On the Importance of Boundary Objects for Virtual Collaboration: A Review of the Literature.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 28 (9): 1108–1122. doi:10.1080/09537325.2016.1181744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marijn, Janssen, Paul Brous, Elsa Estevez, Luis S. Barbosa, and Tomasz Janowski. 2020. “Data Governance: Organizing Data for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence.” Government Information Quarterly 37 (3): 101493. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuser, Michael, and Ulrike Nagel. 2009. “The Expert Interview and Changes in Knowledge Production.” In Interviewing Experts, edited by Alexander Bogner, Beate Littig, and Wolfgang Menz, 17–42. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mischen, Pamela A. 2015. “Collaborative Network Capacity.” Public Management Review 17 (3): 380–403. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.822527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misuraca, Gianluca, and Colin Van Noordt. 2020. “AI Watch: Artificial Intelligence in Public Services - Overview of the Use and Impact of AI in Public Services in the EU.” In EUR, Vol. 30255. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2760/039619.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, Donald P., and Noel Landuyt. 2009. “How Do Public Organizations Learn? Bridging Cultural and Structural Perspectives.” Public Administration Review 69 (6): 1097–1105. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02067.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonpakdee, Wasinee, Thitiporn Khunkornsiri, Acharaphun Phothichai, and Arpawadee Nuntree. 2020. “CIO Competency in Digital Era : A Comparative Study between Government Organizations and Private Enterprises.” In 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications CIO, Bangkok, Thailand, 48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Okwechime, Ekene, Peter Duncan, and David Edgar. 2018. “Big Data and Smart Cities: A Public Sector Organizational Learning Perspective.” Information Systems and E-Business Management 16 (3): 601–625. doi:10.1007/s10257-017-0344-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophelia, Eglene, Sharon S. Dawes, and Carrie A. Schneider. 2007. “Authority and Leadership Patterns in Public Sector Knowledge Networks.” American Review of Public Administration 37 (1): 91–113. doi:10.1177/0275074006290799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittaway, Jeffrey J., and Ali Reza Montazemi. 2020. “Know-How to Lead Digital Transformation: The Case of Local Governments.” Government Information Quarterly 37 (April): 101474. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101474.
   Google Scholar
• Poocharoen, Ora orn, and Bernard Ting. 2015. “Collaboration, Co-Production, Networks: Convergence of Theories.” Public Management Review 17 (4): 587–614. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.866479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebekah, Dibble, and Cristina B. Gibson. 2018. “Crossing Team Boundaries: A Theoretical Model of Team Boundary Permeability and A Discussion of Why It Matters.” Human Relations 71 (7): 925–950. doi:10.1177/0018726717735372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Stephen Cory. 2020. “Trust, Transparency, and Openness: How Inclusion of Cultural Values Shapes Nordic National Public Policy Strategies for Artificial Intelligence (AI).” Technology in Society 63: 101421. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101421. preprint: 101421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajtos, Laszlo, Michael Kleinaltenkamp, and Julie Harrison. 2018. “Boundary Objects for Institutional Work across Service Ecosystems.” Journal of Service Management 29 (4): 615–640. doi:10.1108/JOSM-01-2017-0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. 2013. Coding Manual for Qualitativ Researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scarbrough, Harry, Jacky Swan, Stéphane Laurent, Mike Bresnen, Linda Edelman, and Sue Newell. 2004. “Project-Based Learning and the Role of Learning Boundaries.” Organization Studies 25 (9): 1579–1600. doi:10.1177/0170840604048001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, Andreas P.J., Ram Mudambi, Yves L. Doz, and Ajai Gaur. 2017. “Boundary Spanning in Global Organizations.” Journal of Management Studies 54 (4): 403–421. doi:10.1111/joms.12256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano, Michael D. 2017. “Ignoring the Experts: Networks and Organizational Learning in the Public Sector.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27 (1): 104–119. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh. 2010. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science Technology and Human Values 35 (5): 601–617. doi:10.1177/0162243910377624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Greisemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steensma, H. K. 1996. Acquiring technological competencies through inter-organizational collaboration: an organizational learning perspective. J Eng Tech Manag 12(4):267–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Tara Qian, and Rony Medaglia. 2019. “Mapping the Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: Evidence from Public Healthcare.” Government Information Quarterly 36 (2): 368–383. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydow, Jörg, Lars Lindkvist, and Robert Defillippi. 2004. “Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial.” Organization Studies 25 (9): 1475–1489. doi:10.1177/0170840604048162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.a.a B Van, Dijk. 2007. “The Discourse-Knowledge Interface.” In Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, edited by Gilbert Weiss and Ruth Wodak, 85–109. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230288423.
   Google Scholar
• Trompette, Pascale, and Dominique Vinck. 2009. “Revisiting the Notion of Boundary Object.” Revue d’Anthropologie Des Connaissances 3 (1): 3–27. doi:10.3917/rac.006.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Tupasela, Aaro, Karoliina Snell, and Heta Tarkkala. 2020. “The Nordic Data Imaginary.” Big Data and Society 7 (1): 1. doi:10.1177/2053951720907107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppström, Elin, and Carl Mikael Lönn. 2017. “Explaining Value Co-Creation and Co-Destruction in e-Government Using Boundary Object Theory.” Government Information Quarterly 34 (3): 406–420. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weslei Gomes de, Sousa, Elis Regina Pereira de Melo, Paulo Henrique De Souza Bermejo, Rafael Araújo Sousa Farias, and Adalmir Oliveira Gomes. 2019. “How and Where Is Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector Going? A Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Government Information Quarterly 36 (4): 101392. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Christopher 2019. “Setting the Stage for Transformation: Frontline Reflections on Technology in American Government.” Washington D.C. https://beeckcenter.georgetown.edu/report/setting-the-stage-for-transformation-frontline-reflections-on-technology-in-american-government/.
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, Bernd W., Jan C. Weyerer, and Carolin Geyer. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges.” International Journal of Public Administration 42 (7): 596–615. doi:10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. Edited by Sage 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zuiderwijk, Anneke, Yu Che Chen, and Fadi Salem. 2021. “Implications of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Governance: A Systematic Literature Review and A Research Agenda.” Government Information Quarterly 38 (3): 3. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar