New public management marketizers versus Neo-Weberian state modernizers? Institutional configurations of social impact bond utilization among 18 OECD countries

References

• Albertson, Kevin, Chris Fox, O’Leary Chris, and Gary Painter. 2018. Payment by Results and Social Impact Bonds: Outcome-Based Payment Systems in the UK and US. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albertson, Kevin, Chris Fox, O’Leary Chris, and Gary Painter. 2020. “Towards a Theoretical Framework for Social Impact Bonds.” Nonprofit Policy Forum 11 (2). 2. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Mikkel Munksgaard, Rasmus Dilling-Hansen, and Anne Vorre Hansen. 2022. “Expanding the Concept of Social Impact Bonds.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 13 (3): 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1806100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Rhys, Malcolm J. Beynon, and Aoife McDermott. 2019. “Configurations of New Public Management Reforms and the Efficiency, Effectiveness and Equity of Public Healthcare Systems: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Public Management Review 21 (8): 1236–1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1561927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anheier, Helmut K, and Lester M Salamon. 2006. “The Nonprofit Sector in Comparative Perspective.” In The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, edited by Walter W. Powell and Richard Steinberg, 89–114. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aucoin, Peter. 1996. The New Public Management: Canada in Comparative Perspective ;. Ottawa, Canada: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Bezes, Philippe. 2018. “Exploring the Legacies of New Public Management in Europe.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, edited by Edoardo Ongaro and Sandra Van Thiel, 919–966. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_48.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Eleanor. 2020. “Debate: Would a Social Impact Bond by Any Other Name Smell as Sweet? Stretching the Model and Why it Might Matter.” Public Money & Management 40 (3): 183–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1714288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, Eleanor. 2021. “More Than Marketised? Exploring the Governance and Accountability Mechanisms at Play in Social Impact Bonds.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 24 (1): 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1575736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiapello, Eve, and Lisa Knoll. 2020. “The Welfare Conventions Approach: A Comparative Perspective on Social Impact Bonds.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 22 (2): 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1695965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, Tom, and Per Lægreid. 2002. New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Tom, and Per Lægreid. 2022. “Taking Stock: New Public Management (NPM) and Post-NPN Reforms - Trends and Challenges.” In Handbook on the Politics of Public Administration, edited by Ladner Andreas and Sager Fritz, 38–49. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Tom, Per Lægreid, and P. Laegreid. 1999. “New Public Management: Design, Resistance, or Transformation? A Study of How Modern Reforms Are Received in a Civil Service System.” Public Productivity & Management Review 23 (2): 169–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380777.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, Alistair, and Glyn Jones. 2005. “Reshaping the State: Administrative Reform and New Public Management in France.” Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions 18 (4): 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00292.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, Mark, and Jenny M. Lewis. 2010. “Front-Line Work in Employment Services After Ten Years of New Public Management Reform: Governance and Activation in Australia, the Netherlands and the UK.” European Journal of Social Security 12 (4): 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271001200407.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Christine, Cameron Graham, and Darlene Himick. 2016. “Social Impact Bonds: The Securitization of the Homeless.” Accounting, Organizations & Society 55 (November): 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.10.003.
   Google Scholar
• Dan, Sorin, and Christopher Pollitt. 2015. “NPM Can Work: An Optimistic Review of the Impact of New Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1305–1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.908662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dan, Sorin, David Špaček, and Per Lægreid. 2022. “Public Management Review: The New Public Management: Dead or Still Alive and Co-Existing? State of Play at 40+.” https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/new-public-management/.
   Google Scholar
• Dayson, Chris, Alec Fraser, and Toby Lowe. 2020. “A Comparative Analysis of Social Impact Bond and Conventional Financing Approaches to Health Service Commissioning in England: The Case of Social Prescribing.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 22 (2): 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1643614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dear, Annie, Alisa Helbitz, Rashmi Khare, Ruth Lotan, Jane Newman, Gretchen Crosby Sims, and Alexandra Zaroulis. 2016. Social Impact Bonds: The Early Years. Social Finance. https://socialfinance.org/resource/social-impact-bonds-the-early-years/.
   Google Scholar
• Doberstein, Carey, and Étienne Charbonneau. 2020. “Experimenting with Public Sector Innovation: Revisiting Gow for the Digital Era.” Canadian Public Administration 63 (1): 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, Emma. 2017. “In the Wake of Austerity: Social Impact Bonds and the Financialisation of the Welfare State in Britain.” New Political Economy 22 (3): 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1232709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, Emma, and David Harvie. 2014. “Harnessing the Social: State, Crisis and (Big) Society.” Sociology 48 (5): 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038514539060.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Simon Bastow, and Jane Tinkler. 2006. “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Simon Bastow, and Jane Tinkler. 2007. Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and E-Government. Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM: Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/umanitoba/detail.action?docID=415239.
   Google Scholar
• Economy, Christina, Eleanor Carter, and Mara Airoldi. 2023. “Have We ‘Stretched’ Social Impact Bonds Too Far? An Empirical Analysis of SIB Design in Practice.” International Public Management Journal 26 (3): 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2077867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmiston, Daniel, and Alex Nicholls. 2018. “Social Impact Bonds: The Role of Private Capital in Outcome-Based Commissioning.” Journal of Social Policy 47 (1): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279417000125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E., and T. Andersson. 2023. “The ‘Service Turn’ in a New Public Management Context: A Street-Level Bureaucrat Perspective.” Public Management Review1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2241051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, Dan. 2009. “The ‘Welfare Market’ and the Flexible New Deal: Lessons from Other Countries.” Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 24 (1): 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690940802645471.
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, Peer C. 2011. “Building Better Casual Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organizational Research.” Academy of Management Journal 54 (2): 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, Norman. 2001. “Explaining the New Public Management: The Importance of Context.” In The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, edited by Kathleen McLaughlin, Ewan Ferlie, and Stephen P. Osborne, 57–76. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Chris, and Stephen Morris. 2021. “Evaluating Outcome-Based Payment Programmes: Challenges for Evidence-Based Policy.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 24 (1): 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1575217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, Alec, Lisa Knoll, and Debra Hevenstone. 2023. “Contested Social Impact Bonds: Welfare Conventions, Conflicts and Compromises in Five European Active-Labor Market Programs.” International Public Management Journal 26 (3): 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2089792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, Alec, Stefanie Tan, Kristy Kruithof, Megan Sim, Emma Disley, Chris Giacomantonio, Mylene Lagarde, and Nicholas Mays. 2018. “Evaluation of the Social Impact Bond Trailblazers in Health and Social Care: Final Report.” London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine: Policy Innovation Research Unit. https://golab.bsg.ox.ac.uk/knowledge-bank/resources/sib-trailblazers-health-and-social-care-final-report/.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Alec, Stefanie Tan, Mylene Lagarde, and Nicholas Mays. 2018. “Narratives of Promise, Narratives of Caution: A Review of the Literature on Social Impact Bonds.” Social Policy & Administration 52 (1): 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, Alec, Stefanie Tan, and Nicholas Mays. 2021. “To SIB or Not to SIB? A Comparative Analysis of the Commissioning Processes of Two Proposed Health-Focused Social Impact Bond Financed Interventions in England.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 24 (1): 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1572508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fred, Mats, and Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren. 2022. “Productive Resistance in Public Sector Innovation – Introducing Social Impact Bonds in Swedish Local Government.” Public Management Review 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2123027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag, Markus, and Raphaela Schlicht. 2009. “Educational Federalism in Germany: Foundations of Social Inequality in Education.” Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions 22 (1): 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.01421.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, Max, Jonathan Kimmitt, Rob Wilson, David Jamieson, and Toby Lowe. 2022. “Social Impact Bonds and Public Service Reform: Back to the Future of New Public Management?” International Public Management Journal 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2050859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glor, Eleanor D. 2001. “Has Canada Adopted the New Public Management?” Public Management Review 3 (1): 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616670010009414.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, Shaun, and Joe Wallis. 2010. “Two Myths of Convergence in Public Management Reform.” Public Administration 88 (4): 1099–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01848.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimwood, Rebecca, Tom Baker, Louise Humpage, and Jacob Broom. 2022. “Policy, Fast and Slow: Social Impact Bonds and the Differential Temporalities of Mobile Policy.” Global Social Policy 22 (1): 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018121997809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, Jesse. 2020. “The National Governance and Policy Context of Social Impact Bond Emergence: A Comparative Analysis of Leaders and Skeptics.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 22 (2): 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1695924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, Jesse, and John Loxley. 2021. Social Service, Private Gain: The Political Economy of Social Impact Bonds. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. https://utorontopress.com/ca/social-service-private-gain-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A., and Daniel W. Gingerich. 2009. “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 449–482. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409000672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247757.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher. 1995. “The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme.” Accounting, Organizations & Society 20 (2): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INDIGO. 2021. “Impact Bond Dataset.” Blavatnik School of Government Government Outcomes Lab. https://golab.bsg.ox.ac.uk/knowledge-bank/indigo/impact-bond-dataset-v2/.
   Google Scholar
• Jan Van Helden, G., and E. Pieter Jansen. 2003. “New Public Management in Dutch Local Government.” Local Government Studies 29 (2): 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930308559371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy, Meghan, and John Shields. 2013. “Social Impact Bonds: The Next Phase of Third Sector Marketization?” Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2013v4n2a148.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, Walter. 2007. “Public Management Reforms in Countries with a Napoleonic State Model: France, Italy and Spain.” In New Public Management in Europe: Adaptation and Alternatives, edited by Christopher Pollitt, Sandra van Thiel, and Vincent Homburg, 26–51. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625365_3.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, Walter. 2011. “Public Management Reform in Continental Europe: National Distinctiveness.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, edited by Tom Christensen and Per Lægreid, 97–112. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613321-14.
   Google Scholar
• Kish, Zenia, and Justin Leroy. 2015. “Bonded Life: Technologies of Racial Finance from Slave Insurance to Philanthrocapital.” Cultural Studies 29 (5–6): 630–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2015.1017137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, Christoph. 1999. “Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies.” Journal of Public Policy 19 (2): 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X99000203.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, Sabine. 2010. “New Public Management for the ‘Classical Continental European Administration’: Modernization at the Local Level in Germany, France and Italy.” Public Administration 88 (4): 1116–1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01869.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, Sabine, Jörg Bogumil, and Stephan Grohs. 2008. “Evaluating Administrative Modernization in German Local Governments: Success or Failure of the ‘New Steering Model’?” Public Administration Review 68 (5): 851–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00927.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lægreid, Per, and Tom Christensen. 2007. Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms. Aldershot, England: Routledge. http://uml.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=270207&site=ehost-live.
   Google Scholar
• Le Pendeven, Benjamin. 2019. “Social Impact Bonds: A New Public Management Perspective.” Finance Contrôle Stratégie (NS–5). https://doi.org/10.4000/fcs.3119.
   Google Scholar
• Liebman, Jeffrey B. 2011. Social Impact Bonds: A Promising New Financing Model to Accelerate Social Innovation and Improve Government Performance. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/general/reports/2011/02/09/9050/social-impact-bonds/.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, James, and Gary Goertz. 2006. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Political Analysis 14 (3): 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Mandarin. 2016. “Social Bond Collapse Blamed on ‘Tedious Bureaucratic Processes.” The Mandarin. Accessed July 14, 2016. https://www.themandarin.com.au/67636-new-zealand-first-social-impact-bond-collapses/.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Axel, Benoît Rihoux, and Charles Ragin. 2014. “The Origins, Development, and Application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis: The First 25 Years.” European Political Science Review 6 (1): 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millner, Reinhard, and Michael Meyer. 2022. “Collaborative Governance in Social Impact Bonds: Aligning Interests within Divergent Accountabilities?” Public Management Review 24 (5): 729–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2000253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, Donald P. 2006. “Managing for Results in State Government: Evaluating a Decade of Reform.” Public Administration Review 66 (1): 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00557.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyland, Daniel. 2018. “On the Transformation of Children At-Risk into an Investment Proposition: A Study of Social Impact Bonds as an Anti-Market Device.” The Sociological Review 66 (3): 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026117744415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, David. 1993. “Reinventing Government.” Public Productivity & Management Review 16 (4): 349–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/3381012.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, David E., and Ted A. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, Mass: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Stephen P. 2006. “The New Public Governance? 1.” Public Management Review 8 (3): 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, Stephen P. 2010. “Introduction: The (New) Public Governance: A Suitable Case for Treatment?” In The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, edited by Stephen P. Osborne, 1–16. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, Martin, and B. Guy Peters. 2010. Tradition and Public Administration. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pastore, Lavinia, and Luigi Corvo. 2022. “‘SIB’: What Does it Really Mean? A Theoretical Approach to Understanding Social Impact Bonds.” Public Money & Management 42 (2): 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1809799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, Christopher. 2001. “An Analysis of Impacts and Effects.” In New Public Management Current Trends and Future Prospects, edited by Kathleen McLaughlin, Ewan Ferlie, and Stephen P. Osborne, 274–292. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, Christopher, and Geert Bouckaert. 2017. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - into the Age of Austerity. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/umanitoba/detail.action?docID=4891273.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Emma. 2019. “Next Steps for Social Impact Bonds: Moving from an Economic Tool to a Trust-Based Collaboration.” In Collaborative Governance for Local Economic Development, edited by Denita Cepiku, So Hee Jeon, and David K. Jesuit, 51–64. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (1st ed.) Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbwk.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, Charles C., K. A. Drass, and S. Davey. 2019. “Fuzzy-Set/qualitative Comparative Analysis 3.1.”
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, Charles C., and Benoît Rihoux. 2009. “Configurational Comparative Methods Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques.” In Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 51. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, Benoît. 2003. “Bridging the Gap Between the Qualitative and Quantitative Worlds? A Retrospective and Prospective View on Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Field Methods 15 (4): 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X03257690.
   Google Scholar
• Riot, Elen. 2020. “Betting on Children at Risk: Actors’ Views on the Introduction of Social Impact Bonds in the French Field of ‘Childhood in Danger’.” Journal of Urban Affairs 42 (6): 856–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1758119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roness, Paul G. 2002. “Transforming State Employees’ Unions.” In New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice, edited by Tom Christensen and Per Lægreid, 173–208. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, Lester M, and Helmut K Anheier. 1998. “Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally.” Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally 9 (3): 213–248.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, Kuno, and Isabella Proeller. 2001. “The New Public Management: A Perspective from Mainland Europe.” In New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, edited by Kathleen McLaughlin, Ewan Ferlie, and Stephen P. Osborne, 163–180. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Carsten Q., and Claudius Wagemann. 2012. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244.
   Google Scholar
• Social Finance. 2019. “Impact Bond Global Database.” Social Finance. https://sibdatabase.socialfinance.org.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Stid, Daniel. 2013. “Pay for Success Is Not a Panacea.” Community Development Investment Review 9 (1): 13–18. https://www.frbsf.org/community-development/publications/community-development-investment-review/2013/april/pay-for-success-not-panacea/.
   Google Scholar
• Thomann, Eva, and Martino Maggetti. 2020. “Designing Research with Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools.” Sociological Methods & Research 49 (2): 356–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, Mildred. 2013. “Private Finance for Public Goods: Social Impact Bonds.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 16 (4): 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2013.835727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar