NPM reconsidered: towards the study of enduring forms of NPM

References

• Alkaabi, A., J. Hazzam, S. Wilkins, and S. Dan. 2024. “The Influences of Ambidexterity, New Public Management and Innovation on the Public Service Quality of Government Organizations.” Public Performance & Management Review 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2367130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P. 2017. “New Public Management and New Public Governance: Finding the Balance.” In Professionalism and Public Service, Essays in Honour of Kenneth Kernaghan, edited by D. Siegel and K. Rasmussen, 16–33. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and M. Casula. 2024. “Re-Organizing the Service-Delivery Machine in a “Post-NPM” Era: A Shopping-Basket Approach?” Public Management Review 26 (9): 2561–2585. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2315569.
   Google Scholar
• Bezes, P. 2018. “Exploring the Legacies of New Public Management in Europe.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, edited by E. Ongaro and S. Van Thiel, 919–966. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., B. Chen, and G. E. Mitchell. 2023. “The Rise and Fall of an NPM-Style Reform in China: A Longitudinal Case Study of Sanitation Service Delivery in Guangzhou.” Public Management Review 26 (9): 2586–2610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2260819.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2002. “New Public Management - Puzzles of Democracy and the Influence of Citizens.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (3): 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2007. “The Whole-Of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform.” Public Administration Review 67 (6): 1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid, eds. 2016. The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2022. “Taking Stock: New Public Management (NPM) and Post-NPM Reforms – Trends and Challenges.” In Handbook on the Politics of Public Administration. Public Management – a New Paradigm, edited by A. Ladner, F. Sager, and A. Bastiansen, 38–49. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, and K. A. Røvik. 2020. Organization Theory and the Public Sector, Instrument, Culture and Myth. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, Oxon.
   Google Scholar
• Dan, S. 2015. “The New Public Management Is Not That Bad After All: Evidence from Estonia, Hungary and Romania.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 44E (44E): 57–73. https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000349733000004?SID=EUW1ED0CAABSnXwmBF0XkZCyCVwVg.
   Google Scholar
• Dan, S. 2017. The Coordination of European Public Hospital Systems: Interests, Cultures and Resistance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dan, S. 2024. “Theoretical Approaches to Measuring Governance: Public Administration, Chapter 5.” In Handbook on Measuring Governance, edited by J. M. Lewis and P. Triantafillou, 80–95. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dan, S., and R. Andrews. 2016. “Market-Type Mechanisms and Public Service Equity: A Review of Experiences in European Public Services.” Public Organization Review 16 (3): 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0310-6.
   Google Scholar
• Dan, S., and C. Pollitt. 2015. “NPM Can Work: An Optimistic Review of the Impact of New Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1305–1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.908662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler. 2006. “New Public Management Is Dead - Long Live Digital-Era Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elston, T. 2024. Understanding and Improving Public Management Reforms. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eppel, E. A., and M. L. Rhodes. 2017. “Complexity Theory and Public Management: A ‘Becoming’ Field.” Public Management Review 20 (7): 949–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1364414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funck, E. K., and T. S. Karlsson. 2020. “Twenty-Five Years of Studying New Public Management in Public Administration: Accomplishments and Limitations.” Financial Accountability & Management 36 (4): 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funck, E. K., and T. S. Karlsson. 2023. “Governance Innovation as Social Imaginaries: Challenges of Post-NPM.” Public Management Review 26 (9): 2680–2699. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2281981.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, R., and P. Cairney. 2015. Handbook on Complexity and Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., and J. Halligan. 2024. “Reform, Hybridization, and Revival: The Status of New Public Management in Australia and New Zealand.” Public Management Review 26 (9): 2542–2560. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2329770.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, J., and B. Chen 2024. “New Public Management Marketizers versus Neo-Weberian State Modernizers? Institutional Configurations of Social Impact Bond Utilization Among 18 OECD Countries.” Public Management Review, Online First 26 (9): 2653–2679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2369789.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2005. “The Idea of Joined-Up Government: A Historical Perspective.” In Joined-Up Government, British Academy Occasional Papers, edited by V. Bogdanor online ed., 19–42. London: British Academy Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., and R. Dixon. 2015. A Government That Worked Better and Cost Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., and B. G. Peters. 2004. “The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (3): 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivana, D., S. Dan, and O. C. Popovici. 2019. “Customer Focus in European Higher Education Systems.” In Applied Ethics for Entrepreneurial Success: Recommendations for the Developing World, edited by S. Văduva, I. Fotea, L.P. Văduva, and R. Wilt, 111–127. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, T. S. 2024. “NPM (2.0) - a Blast from the Past.” In The Resilience of New Public Management, edited by I. Lapsley and P. Miller, 345–369. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., and P. Miller, eds. 2024. The Resilience of New Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapuente, V., and S. Van de Walle. 2020. “The Effects of New Public Management on the Quality of Public Services.” Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions 33 (3): 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., and D. Gill. 2011. “Towards a New Era of Administrative Reform? The Myth of Post-NPM in New Zealand.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 24 (1): 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01508.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemec, J., D. Špaček, P. Suwaj, and A. Modrzejewski. 2012. “Public Management as a University Discipline in New European Union Member States.” Public Management Review 14 (8): 1087–1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.657834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, J. 2007. “From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 66 (3): 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00545.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., ed. 2010. The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., G. Nasi, and M. Powell. 2021. “Beyond Co-Production: Value Creation and Public Services.” Public Administration 99 (4): 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., M. Powell, T. Cui, and K. Strokosch. 2022. “Value Creation in the Public Service Ecosystem: An Integrative Framework.” Public Administration Review 82 (4): 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patashnik, E. M. 2009. Reforms at Risk: What Happens After Major Policy Changes Are Enacted?Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pevcin, P., D. Špaček, and D. Klimovský. 2019. “Public Administration Education in the CEE Countries: How it Has Developed During the Recent Decades?” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 12 (2): 217–232. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaček, M., J. Nemec, R. Jahoda, and I. Malý. 2023. “Performance Funding of Universities and Its Impacts on Accountability: The Case of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Public Management Review 26 (9): 2630–2652. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2253463.
   Google Scholar
• Plaček, M., J. Nemec, F. Ochrana, M. Půček, M. Křápek, and D. Špaček. 2020. “Do Performance Management Schemes Deliver Results in the Public Sector? Observations from the Czech Republic.” Public Money & Management 41 (8): 636–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1732053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 1990. Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2003. The Essential Public Manager. Buckingham: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2016. “Managerialism Redux?” Financial Accountability & Management 32 (4): 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2017. Public Management Reform, a Comparative Analysis – into the Age of Austerity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and S. Dan. 2013. “Searching for Impacts in Performance-Oriented Management Reform: A Review of the European Literature.” Public Performance & Management Review 37 (1): 7–32. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576370101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter, R., and T. Klenk. 2019. “The Manifold Meanings of ‘Post-New Public Management’ – a Systematic Literature Review.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 85 (1): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318759736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Špaček, D. 2015. “Quality Management in the Czech Public Administration.” In Implementation of New Public Management Tools: Experiences from Transition and Emerging Countries, edited by J. Nemec and M. de Vries, 285–304. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• Špaček, D. 2018. “Public Administration Reform in Czechia After 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results?” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 11 (1): 155–182. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0007.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 2006. “Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance.” The American Review of Public Administration 36 (1): 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2023. Rethinking Public Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., L. B. Andersen, C. Greve, and K. K. Klausen. 2020. Public Governance Paradigms, Competing and Co-Existing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, A., and G. Bouckaert 2024. “Creation of State Organizations: Experiments with Ideal-Type Reform Models in a Non-Western Country.” Public Management Review 26 (9): 2611–2629. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2339947.
   Google Scholar