Affective logic of competition images

REFERENCES

• Ahmed, S. 2004. “Affective Economies.” Social Text 22 (2): 117–139. doi:10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2010. The Promise of Happiness . London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alan, L. , and D. McCormack . 2009. “Thinking with Images in Non-Representational Cities: Vignettes from Berlin.” Area 41: 252–262. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00868.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2009. “Affective Atmospheres.” Emotion, Space and Society 2: 77–81. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2014. Encountering Affect: Capacities, Apparatuses, Conditions . Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. , and J. Ash . 2015. “Atmospheric Methods.” In Non-Representational Theory and Methodologies: Re-Envisioning Research , edited by P. Vannini . London: Routledge, 34–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, J. 2010. “Architectures of Affect: Anticipating and Manipulating the Event in Processes of Videogame Design and Testing.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (4): 653–671. doi:10.1068/d9309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor, D. 2000. Chromophobia . London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, G. 1993. “Atmosphere as the Fundamental Concept of a New Aesthetics.” Thesis Eleven 36: 113–126. doi:10.1177/072551369303600107.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, I. 2007. “Imaging Architecture: The Uses of Photography in the Practice of Architectural History.” The Journal of Architecture 12 (1): 57–77. doi:10.1080/13602360701217989.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, C. , and L. Steiner , eds. 2004. Critical Readings: Media and Gender . Maidenhead and New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. , and D. McCormack . 2006. “Film, Geopolitics and Affective Logics of Intervention.” Political Geography 25: 228–245. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, S. 2015. Action Movies’ Worlding. Affect Theory Conference , Lancaster PA.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, O. F. 2014. “The New Language of the Digital Film.” Journal of Popular Film and Television 42 (1): 47–58. doi:10.1080/01956051.2012.759898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, R. 2013. Transforming Images: Screens, Affect, Futures . London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colomina, B. , ed. 1992. Sexuality and Space . New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colonnese, F. 2016. “Human Figure as a Cultural Mediator in Architectural Drawings.” In Cultural Influences on Architecture , edited by G. Koç , M.-T. Claes , and B. Christiansen , 90–129. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Dufrenne, M. 1973. [1953]. The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience . Translated by Edward Casey., Albert Anderson, Willis Domingo, and Leon Jacobson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, E. , and K. Bhaumik , 2009. Visual Sense: A Cultural Reader . Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Flueckiger, B. 2015. “Photorealism, Nostalgia and Style.” In Special Effects: New Histories, Theories, Contexts , edited by M. Duffy , D. North , and B. Rehak , 78–96. London: BFI Palgrave MacMillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, H. 2008. “Image Building.” In Architecture between Spectacle and Use , edited by A. Vidler , 164–179. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, B. , and F. Wilson . 2004. “Women Architects and Their Discontents.” Sociology 38 (1): 101–119. doi:10.1177/0038038504039363.
   Google Scholar
• Frascari, M. 1987. “The Body and Architecture in the Drawings of Carlo Scarpa.” RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 14 (1): 123–142.
   Google Scholar
• Frichot, H. 2008. “Olafur Eliasson and the Circulation of Affects and Percepts: in Conversation.” In Interior Atmospheres, edited by J. Preston. London: John Wiley and Sons, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Frichot, H. 2015. “Söder Pops Island: My Own Personal Gentri-Fiction.” Candide-Journal for Architectural Knowledge 9 (6): 2–24.
   Google Scholar
• Geuens, J.-P. 2014. “The Depth of the Field.” Quarterly Review of Film and Video 31 (6): 572–585. doi:10.1080/10509208.2012.686812.
   Google Scholar
• Godber, B. 1998. “The Knowing and Subverting Reader.” In Occupying Architecture: Between the Architect and the User , edited by J. Hill , 179–194. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gurevitch, L. 2010. “The Cinemas of Transactions: The Exchangeable Currency of the Digital Attraction.” Television New Media 11 (5): 367–385. doi:10.1177/1527476410361726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. , and D. L. Hays . 2008. “On the Use and Misuse of Historical Landscape Views.” In Representing Landscape Architecture, edited by M. Treib, 22–41. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. 2005. “Invoking Affect: Cultural Theory and the Ontological Turn.” Cultural Studies 19 (5): 548–567. doi:10.1080/09502380500365473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosey, L. 2001. “Hidden Lines: Gender, Race, and the Body in Graphic Standards.” Journal of Architectural Education 55 (2): 101–112. doi:10.1162/104648801753199527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, D. , ed. 1991. The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology of the Senses . Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kavka, M. 2008. Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy . Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, A. 2015. Architecture, Affect and Architectural Practice (Doctoral Dissertation). Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, B. 2006. Beyond the Multiplex: Cinema, New Technologies, and the Home . Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, N. 1999. The Anaesthetics of Architecture . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipstadt, H. 2009. “Experimenting with the Experimental Tradition, 1989–2009: On Competitions and Architecture Research.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 21 (2/3): 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, H. 2005. “Herding Memories of Humans and Animals.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (4): 497–518. doi:10.1068/d381t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimer, J. 2010. “Moving Image Methodologies for More-Than-Human Geographies.” Cultural Geographies 17 (2): 237–258. doi:10.1177/1474474010363853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2005. “Critical of What? toward a Utopian Realism.” Harvard Design Magazine 22 (2): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation . Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, D. P. 2009. “Aerostatic Spacing: On Things Becoming Lighter than Air.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34 (1): 25–41. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00329.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melissa, G. , and G. J. Seigworth . 2010. The Affect Theory Reader . Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, L. 2010. “Visual Sociology Reframed: An Analytical Synthesis and Discussion of Visual Methods in Social and Cultural Research.” In Sage Visual Methods , edited by J. Hughes , 545–581. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. 2013. “Atmospheres of Law: Senses, Affects, Lawscapes.” Emotion, Space and Society 7: 35–44. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2012.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2011. “Sensory Digital Photography: Re-Thinking ‘Moving’ and the Image.” Visual Studies 26 (1): 4–13. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2011.548484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2015. “Approaching Media through the Senses: Between Experience and Representation.” Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy: Quarterly Journal of Media Research and Resources 154: 5–14. doi:10.1177/1329878X1515400103.
   Google Scholar
• Pinney, C. 2009. “What Do Pictures Want Now? Rural Consumers of Images in India.” In Visual Sense: A Cultural Reader , edited by E. Edwards and K. Bhaumik , 417–425. Berg: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Probyn, E. 2005. Blush: Faces of Shame . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, J. 2007. “Visual Methods and the Visual Culture of Schools.” Visual Studies 22 (1): 13–30. doi:10.1080/14725860601167143.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. E. 2008. “The New ‘New’: Making a Case for Critical Affect Studies.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 94 (2): 200–212. doi:10.1080/00335630801975434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2007. Visual Methodologies . London and Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfield, K. 2015. Morphosis Unveils Plans for 381-Meter-Tall Skyscraper in Vals. http://www.archdaily.com/613189/morphosis-unveils-plans-for-reflective-skyscraper-in-vals.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, M. 2012. “The 3-D Aesthetic: Avatar and Hyperhaptic Visuality.” Screen 54 (4): 381–397. doi:10.1093/screen/hjs035.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, P. L. 2006. “The Phenomenology of Affect.” Smith College Studies in Social Work 76 (1/2): 67–70. doi:10.1300/J497v76n01_07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaviro, S. 2010. Post-Cinematic Affect . Winchester: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shouse, E. 2005. “Feeling, Emotion, Affect.” M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture 8 (6). Accessed May 15, 2015. http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0512/03-shouse.php.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 2007. “The Philosophy of Landscape.” Theory, Culture and Society 24 (7–8): 20–29. doi:10.1177/0263276407084465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smitheram, J. 2012. “Regulation and Transformation: A Content Analysis of the Representation of Women in Architecture New Zealand, 1998–2008.” Architectural Theory Review 17 (2–3): 299 –316. doi:10.1080/13264826.2012.738691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somol, R. , and S. Whiting . 2002. “. Notes around the Doppler Effect and Other Moods Ofmodernism.” Perspecta 33: 72–77. doi:10.2307/1567298.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, N. 2002. “White Cubes and Red Knots.” M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture 5 (3). Accessed February 26, 2017. http://www.media-culture.org.au/0207/whitecubes.php.
   Google Scholar
• Till, J. 2008. “Architecture and Contingency.” Field 1 (1): 120–135.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. 2008. “New Forms of Writing, New Visual Competencies.” Visual Studies 23 (2): 130–135. doi:10.1080/14725860802276263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesely, D. 2002. “The Architectonics of Embodiment.” In Body and Building: Essays on the Changing Relation of Body and Architecture , edited by G. Dodds and R. Tavernor , 28–43. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, M. 1992. “Untitled: The Housing of Gender.” In Sexuality and Space , edited by B. Colomina and J. Bloomer , 327–389. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, M. , O. Eliasson , and D. Birnhaum . 2006. “The Hegemony of TiO2: A Discussion on the Colour White; A Conversation between Mark Wigley, Mark Eliasson and Daniel Burnbaum.” In Olafur Eliasson: Your Engagement Has Consequences; on the Relativity of Your Reality , edited by S. O. Eliasson , 241–251. Baden: Lars Müller Publishers.
   Google Scholar