Action camera: First person perspective or hybrid in motion?

References

• Atkinson, J. M., and J. Heritage, eds. 1984. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. M., R. Dilley, and K. Marshall. 2008. “Using a head-Mounted Video Camera to Understand Social Worlds and Experiences.” Sociological Research Online 13 (6): 31–40. doi:10.5153/sro.1818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., and B. Torbert. 2003. “Transforming Inquiry and Action: Interweaving 27 Flavors of Action Research.” Action Research 1 (2): 133–152. doi:10.1177/14767503030012002.
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, S. 2018. “Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 21 (2): 74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eugeni, R. 2012. “First Person Shot. New Forms of Subjectivity between Cinema and Intermedia Networks.” Analisi: Quaderns de ComunicaciÛ i Cultura (2–3): 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Frers, L. 2009. “Video Research in the Open: Encounters Involving the Researcher-camera.” In Video Interaction Analysis: Methods and Methodology, edited by U. Tikvah Kissmann, 155–177. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Frers, L. 2013. “The Matter of Absence.” Cultural Geographies 20 (4): 431–445. doi:10.1177/1474474013477775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genette, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1969. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. 1994. “Gibson’s Affordances.” Psychological Review 101 (2): 336–342. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, S. 2006. “A Theory of Narrative Empathy.” Narrative 14: 207236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindt, D. 2011. “Seeing through the Eyes of the Students: First Impressions of Recording in the Classroom with a GoPro Head-mounted Camcorder.” Nagoya University of Foreign Studies Journal of the School of Contemporary International Studies 7: 179–199.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsley, K. M., D. Schoonover, and J. Spitler. 2016. “GoPro as an Ethnographic Tool: A Wayfinding Study in an Academic Library.” Journal of Access Services 13 (1): 7–23. doi:10.1080/15367967.2016.1154465.
   Google Scholar
• Lahlou, S. 2011. “How Can We Capture the Subject’s Perspective? an Evidence-based Approach for the Social Scientist.” Social Science Information 50 (3–4): 607–655. doi:10.1177/0539018411411033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurier, E. 2014. “The Graphic Transcript: Poaching Comic Book Grammar for Inscribing the Visual, Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Action.” Geography Compass 8 (4): 235–248. doi:10.1111/gec3.12123.
   Google Scholar
• Liggett, H. 2007. “Urban Aesthetics and the Excess of Fact.” In Encountering Urban Places: Visual and Material Performances in the City, edited by L. Frers and L. Meier, 9–23. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lofthus, L., and K. Silseth. 2019. “Students Choosing Digital Sources: Studying Students’ Information Literacy in Group Work with Tablets.” E-Learning and Digital Media 204275301983588. doi:10.1177/2042753019835882.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, H. S. 2004. “The Impersonal Voice in First-person Narrative Fiction.” Narrative 12 (2): 133–150. doi:10.1353/nar.2004.0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 1999. “Affordance, Conventions, and Design.” interactions 6 (3): 38–43. doi:10.1145/301153.301168.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2015. “Going Forward through the World: Thinking Theoretically about First Person Perspective Digital Ethnography.” Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science 49 (2): 239–252. doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9292-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., J. Kitzinger, and C. Kitzinger. 2015. “Anonymising Interview Data: Challenges and Compromise in Practice.” Qualitative Research 15 (5): 616–632. doi:10.1177/1468794114550439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens Griffin, N. 2019. “Comics and Visual Biography: Sequential Art in Social Research.” Visual Studies 1–17. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2019.1691940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannini, P., and L. M. Stewart. 2017. “The GoPro Gaze.” Cultural Geographies 24 (1): 149–155. doi:10.1177/1474474016647369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, P., S. Waite, and I. Frampton. 2014. “Play Frames, or Framed Play? the Use of Film Cameras in Visual Ethnographic Research with Children.” Journal of Playwork Practice 1 (1): 23–38. doi:10.1332/205316214X13944541282274.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, W. J., A. M. Dickinson, A. Meah, and F. Short. 2016. “Reflections on the Use of Visual Methods in a Qualitative Study of Domestic Kitchen Practices.” Sociology 50 (3): 470–485. doi:10.1177/0038038515587651.
   Google Scholar