Embracing new paths in visual research facilitation: opportunities, tensions & ethical considerations

References

• Bratchford, G., G. Giotaki, and L. Wewiora. 2018. “Socially Engaged Photography and Wellbeing: Reflections on a Case Study in the Northwest of England.” London Journal of Primary Care 10 (4): 82–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2018.1477439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkholder, C., and M. Rogers. 2020a. “Moving Beyond Celebration Toward Action: Screening Cellphilms and Participatory Videos for Different Audiences.” In Art as an Agent for Social Change, edited by M. Carter, C. Mitchell and H. Mreiwed, 10–20. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill/Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Burkholder, C., and M. Rogers. 2020b. “Screening Participatory Visual Research in Live-Audience and Online Spaces: Tensions, Contradictions, and Opportunities.” Visual Methodologies 8 (1): 1–15. https://journals.sfu.ca/vm/index.php/vm/article/view/129/111
   Google Scholar
• Burkholder, C., and A. Thorpe. 2019. “Cellphilm Production as Posthumanist Research Method to Explore Injustice with Queer Youth in New Brunswick, Canada.” Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology 10 (2–3): 292–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.3680.
   Google Scholar
• Cajete, G. 1993. “An Enchanted Land: Spiritual Ecology and a Theology of Place.” Winds of Change 8 (2): 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Culshaw, S. 2019. “The Unspoken Power of Collage? Using an Innovative Arts-based Research Method to Explore the Experience of Struggling as a Teacher.” London Review of Education 17 (3): 268–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D.J., and M. Levin. 2006. Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, A., K. Harper, and M. Otañez. 2016. Participatory Visual and Digital Research in Action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A, and C. Sinclair. 2014. Critical Plays: Embodied Research for Social Change. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hauber-Özer, M., and M. Call-Cummings. 2020. “Empowerment or Exposure? Ethical Dilemmas of Visual Methods with Vulnerable Migrants.” Qualitative Research Journal 20 (3): 329–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-10-2019-0075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttrell, W. 2019. “Reflexive Qualitative Research.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.553.
   Google Scholar
• MacEntee, K., C. Burkholder and J. Schwab-Cartas. 2019. “Cellphilms.” In The Oxford Handbook of Methods for Public Scholarship, 419–442. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacEntee, Katie, C. Burkholder, and J. Schwab-Cartas. 2016. What’s a Cellphilm?: Integrating Mobile Phone Technology into Participatory Visual Research and Activism. The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, E.J., C. Mitchell, and N. De Lange. 2012. Handbook of Participatory Video. Rowman & Lanham, MD: Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., N. de Lange, and R. Moletsane. 2017. Participatory Visual Methodologies: Social Change, Community and Policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nygreen, K. 2009. “Critical Dilemmas in PAR: Toward a New Theory of Engaged Research for Social Change.” Social Justice 36 (4): 14–35.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, L. 2010. “Visual Sociology Reframed: An Analytical Synthesis and Discussion of Visual Methods in Social and Cultural Research.” Sociological Methods & Research 38 (4): 545–581. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124110366233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan, S.K., and E.A. Kinsella. 2013. “Picture This … Safety, Dignity, and Voice— Ethical Research with Children: Practical Considerations for the Reflexive Researcher.” Qualitative Inquiry 19 (2): 81–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412462987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Råheim, M., L.H. Magnussen, R. J. Tveit Sekse, Å. Lunde, T. Jacobsen, and A. Blystad. 2016. “Researcher–Researched Relationship in Qualitative Research: Shifts in Positions and Researcher Vulnerability.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 11 (1): 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30996.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. 2002. “Poetic Representation of Interviews.” In Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method, edited by J.F. Gubrium and J.A. Holstein, 877–891. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, L.B. 2016. “Indigenous Resurgence and Co-resistance.” Critical Ethnic Studies 2 (2): 19–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.5749/jcritethnstud.2.2.0019.
   Google Scholar
• Sklar, M., and M.K. Donahue. 2018. “Process over Product: The 1990s United States Hardcore and Emo Subcultures and DIY Consumerism.” Punk & Post Punk 7 (2): 155–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1386/punk.7.2.155_1.
   Google Scholar
• Switzer, S. 2018. “What’s in an Image?: Towards a Critical and Interdisciplinary Reading of Participatory Visual Methods.” In Creating Social Change Through Creativity, edited by M. Capous-Desyllas and K. Morgaine, 189–207. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Switzer, S. 2020. ““People Give and Take a Lot in order to Participate in Things:” Youth Talk Back–Making a Case for Non-participation.” Curriculum Inquiry 50 (2): 168–193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2020.1766341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C A. 2013. “Mobile Sections and Flowing Matter in Participant-generated Video: Exploring a Deleuzian Approach to Visual Sociology.” In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by R. Coleman and J. Ringrose, 42–60. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaselli, K. G., and J. Dockney. 2018. “Cellphilms, Visual Culture and New Narratives.” English Studies 132 (1): 142–161.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E. 2009. “Suspending Damage: A Letter to Communities.” Harvard Educational Review 79 (3): 409–428. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., and K. W. Yang. 2014. “R-words: Refusing Research.” In Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities, 223–48. London: SAGE Publications. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544329611.
   Google Scholar
• Urrieta, Jr, L. 2015. “Learning by Observing and Pitching in and the Connections to Native and Indigenous Knowledge Systems.” In Advances in Child Development and Behavior 49 (1): 357–379.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner, J. 2014. “Visual Sociology.” Visual Studies 29 (3): 311–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2014.941583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C.C. 1999. “Photovoice: A Participatory Action Research Strategy Applied to Women’s Health.” Journal of Women’s Health 8 (2): 185–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.1999.8.185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wemigwase, S., and E. Tuck. 2019. “Research before and after the Academy.” In Applying Indigenous Research Methods: Storying with Peoples and Communities, edited by S. Windchief and T. San Pedro, 76–96. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, J., T. Shahrokh, and N. Derakhshani. 2020. “Transformative Storywork: Creative Pathways for Social Change.” In Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change, edited by J. Servaes, 733–753. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zuev, D., and G. Bratchford. 2020. Visual Sociology: Practices and Politics in Contested Spaces. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar