Sharing and redefining power with Vice President Harris: the visual framing by the Biden White House

References

• Appelbaum, Y. 2016. "I Alone Can Fix It." July 21. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/07/trump-rnc-speech-alone-fix-it/492557/.
   Google Scholar
• Assmann, J. 2011. “Communicative and Cultural Memory.” In Cultural Memories, edited by Peter Meusburger, Michael Heffernan, and Edgar Wunder. 15–27. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Assmann, J., and J. Czaplicka. 1995. “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity.” New German Critique 65, 125-133. doi:10.2307/488538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, N. S. 2011. “Newsreels as Domestic Propaganda: Visual Rhetoric at the Dawn of the Cold War.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 14 (1): 69–100. doi:10.2307/41940524
   Google Scholar
• Biden, J. R. Jr. 2020. “Why America Must Lead Again.” Foreign Affairs. March/April. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-01-23/why-america-must-lead-again.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. . Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, M. 2017. "Political scientist: First 100 days a pretty meaningless benchmark." April 28. http://news.northeastern.edu/2017/04/political-scientist-first-100-days-a-pretty-meaningless-benchmark/.
   Google Scholar
• Canel, M. J., and M. García Gurrionero. 2016. “Framing Analysis, Dramatism and Terrorism Coverage: Politician and Press Responses to the Madrid Airport Bombing.” Communication & Society 29 (4): 133–149. doi:10.15581/003.29.4.133-149
   Google Scholar
• Chun, R. S. 2018. “Visual Rhetoric of the Presidency: An Analysis of the Trump and Obama White House Messaging in Their First 100 Days in Flickr Images.” Journal of Visual Literacy 37 (1): 18–39. doi:10.1080/1051144X.2018.1450129
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. 1997. Art and Propaganda in the Twentieth Century: The Political Image in the Age of Mass Culture. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Debord, G. 2012. Society of the Spectacle. London: Bread and Circuses Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez, C. B. K. 2005. “Is It a Honeymoon? An Empirical Investigation of the President's First Hundred Days.” Congress & the Presidency: A Journal of Capital Studies 32 (1): 63–78. doi:10.1080/07343460509507697
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. J. 1985. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. L. 2012. “Visual Literacy and Visual Politics: Photojournalism and the 2004 Presidential Debates.” Communication Quarterly 60 (5): 681–697. doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.725000
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbring, L., E. N. Goldenberg, and A. H. Miller. 1980. “Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: A New Look at Agenda-Setting by the Media.” American Journal of Political Science 24 (1): 16–49. doi:10.2307/2110923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, J. 2022. "Kamala Harris Is Stuck." New York Times, July 25. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/25/opinion/kamala-harris-joe-biden.html.
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D. 2010. “ReCal: Intercoder Reliability Calculation as a Web Service.” International Journal of Internet Science 5 (1): 20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Frendreis, J., R. Tatalovich, and J. Schaff. 2001. “Predicting Legislative Output in the First one-Hundred Days, 1897-1995.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (4): 853–870. doi:10.1177/106591290105400409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frosh, P. 2001. “The Public Eye and the Citizen-Voyeur: Photography as a Performance of Power.” Social Semiotics 11 (1): 43–59. doi:10.1080/10350330123316
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., and A. Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1086/229213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geise, S., and C. Baden. 2015. “Putting the Image Back Into the Frame: Modeling the Linkage Between Visual Communication and Frame-Processing Theory.” Communication Theory 25 (1): 46–69. doi:10.1111/comt.12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassman, C., and K. Kenney. 1994. “Mythe & Presidential Campaign Photographs.” Visual Communication Quarterly 1 (4): 4–7. doi:10.1080/15551393.1994.10387508
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, T. R., and S. S. Hansen. 2017. “Image Control: The Visual Rhetoric of President Obama.” Howard Journal of Communications 28 (1): 55–71. doi:10.1080/10646175.2016.1235518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. K. 1988. “Opinion | Van Buren’s ‘Jinx’.” The New York Times, May 28. https://www.nytimes.com/1988/05/28/opinion/van-burens-jinx.html.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnow, T. 2013. “Facing off: A Comparative Analysis of Obama and Romney Facebook Timeline Photographs.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (11): 1584–1595. doi:10.1177/0002764213489013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, M. E., and E. P. Bucy. 2009. Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, M. E., and E. P. Bucy. 2010. “Image Bite Analysis of Political Visuals.” In Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques, edited by E. Bucy and R. L. Holbert. New York: Routledge. 209.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. 2004. “Picturing America's ‘War on Terrorism’ in Afghanistan and Iraq: Photographic Motifs as News Frames.” Journalism 5 (4): 381–402. doi:10.1177/1464884904044201
   Google Scholar
• Hermida, A. 2010. “Twittering the News: The Emergence of Ambient Journalism.” Journalism Practice 4 (3): 297–308. doi:10.1080/17512781003640703
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., and A. H. Gunnthorsdottir. 2000. “The Persuasive Effects of Emotive Visual Imagery: Superficial Manipulation or the Product of Passionate Reason?” Political Psychology 21 (4): 745–778. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, T. S. 2021. “The Effects of Donald Trump.” Policy Studies 42 (5-6): 755–769. doi:10.1080/01442872.2021.1980114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., and P. Waldman. 2003. The Press Effect: Politicians, Journalists, and the Stories That Shape the Political World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., and R. Oyama. 2001. Visual Meaning: A Social Semiotic. The Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: SAGE Publications, 134–157.
   Google Scholar
• Kneupper, C. W. 1979. “Dramatistic Invention: The Pentad as a Heuristic Procedure.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 9 (3): 130–136. doi:10.1080/02773947909390535
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., J. Snyder-Duch, and C. C. Bracken. 2002. “Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability.” Human Communication Research 28 (4): 587–604. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
   Google Scholar
• Lott, J. 2008. The Warm Bucket Brigade: The Story of the American Vice Presidency. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M., J. P. Llamas, E. Lopez-Escobar, and F. Rey. 1997. “Candidate Images in Spanish Elections: Second-Level Agenda-Setting Effects.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 74 (4): 703–717. doi:10.1177/107769909707400404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., and D. L. Shaw. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 176–187. doi:10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messaris, P. 1997. Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A., and V. LaPoe. 2016. “Visual Agenda-Setting.” Emotion, and the BP Oil Disaster. Visual Communication Quarterly 23 (1): 53–63. doi:10.1080/15551393.2015.1128335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molyneux, L., & McGregor, S. C. 2022. “Legitimating a Platform: Evidence of Journalists’ Role in Transferring Authority to Twitter.” Information, Communication & Society 25 (11): 1577–1595. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. 1988. A Heartbeat Away: Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on the Vice Presidency. New York, NY: Priority Press Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Neustadt, R. E. 2001. “The Contemporary Presidency: The Presidential “Hundred Days”: An Overview.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 31 (1): 121–125. doi:10.1111/j.0360-4918.2001.00159.x
   Google Scholar
• Nimmo, D. D., and R. L. Savage. 1976. Candidates and Their Images: Concepts, Methods, and Findings. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Osei Fordjour, N. K. 2022. “Fantasy Themes, Symbolic Power, and Twitter: A Multimodal Analysis of Vice President Kamala Harris’s First 90 Days.” Howard Journal of Communications 33 (3): 314–334. doi:10.1080/10646175.2021.1986754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., and G. M. Kosicki. 1993. “Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse.” Political Communication 10 (1): 55–75. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
   Google Scholar
• Pye, D., and M. A. Taylor. 2021. “Backward and in Converse: Artful Political Communication; How the Biden/Harris Presidential Ticket Reverses the 2-for-1 Campaign.” American Behavioral Scientist 1–24. doi:10.1177/000276422110003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riefenstahl, L., Director. 1936. Triumph Of The Will [Motion picture]. Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, K., and Z. Kanno-Youngs. 2021. “Heir Apparent or Afterthought? The Frustrations of Kamala Harris.” New York Times, December 23. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/23/us/politics/kamala-harris-biden-administration.html.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. 1999. “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 49 (1): 103–122. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., and D. Tewksbury. 2007. “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 9–20. doi:10.1111/J.0021-9916.2007.00326.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schill, D. 2012. “The Visual Image and the Political Image: A Review of Visual Communication Research in the Field of Political Communication.” Review of Communication 12 (2): 118–142. doi:10.1080/15358593.2011.653504
   Google Scholar
• Self, C. 2020. “Fake News, Collective Memory, and Political Discourse.” In Fake News: Real Issues in Modern Communication, edited by R. Chun, and S. J. Drucker, 1st ed., 17–35. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, R. T., and D. Schill. 2019. “The Visual Presidency of Donald Trump’s First Hundred Days: Political Image-Making and Digital Media.” In Visual Political Communication, edited by A. Veneti, D. Jackson, and D. G. Lilleker, 167–186. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. 2012. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, B. 2007. “The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back in.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 60–78. doi:10.1111/J.0021-9916.2007.00329.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanta, W. 1988. “The Effects of Dominant Photographs: An Agenda-Setting Experiment.” Journalism Quarterly 65 (1): 107–111. doi:10.1177/107769908806500114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White House. 2021. The First 100 Days. https://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/albums/72157719052527991.
   Google Scholar
• White House. [@whitehouse]. n.d. Tweets [Twitter profile].
   Google Scholar
• Zald, M. N. 1966. “Politics and Symbols: A Review Article.” The Sociological Quarterly 7 (1): 85–91. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1966.tb02268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelizer, B. 2010. About to Die: How News Images Move the Public. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zulli, D. 2021. “Constructing Gender, Race, Marital Status, and Sexual Orientation as “Presidential”.” In The Internet and the 2020 Campaign, edited by T. Towner and J. Baumgartner, 119. Washington, DC: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar